Thanks, I'll try the software as all of the backplate controls (output and gain) are both at the lowest settings alreadyVia the backplate controls or in the MA 1 software (System Level setting).
Thanks, I'll try the software as all of the backplate controls (output and gain) are both at the lowest settings alreadyVia the backplate controls or in the MA 1 software (System Level setting).
Is it still too loud? But yes, MA 1 allows setting the output level all the way down to 0 dBSPLThanks, I'll try the software as all of the backplate controls (output and gain) are both at the lowest settings already
Yeah still very loud - looking around now to see if there is an MA 1 available to rent from any mutuals.Is it still too loud? But yes, MA 1 allows setting the output level all the way down to 0 dBSPL
Why rent? I'm not talking about the mic, just the software. It's available for download from Neumann website (need to register).Yeah still very loud - looking around now to see if there is an MA 1 available to rent from any mutuals.
Oh cool, I thought I had to have the mic for the software. Not much information available about this product around haha.Why rent? I'm not talking about the mic, just the software. It's available for download from Neumann website (need to register).
Of course.My question is whether this also adjust the volume in case of digital input via S/PDIF?
I still wouldn't regard it as volume control (think of it more like a sensitivity setting). Each change in the system level setting is far from instantaneous because it manipulates the speaker's DSP configuration registers, not the incoming signal.I haven't tried the digital input from, say my CD player, afraid of out of control volume level.
In a way I agree, when the system level is changed, it took a second and the UI refreshes. It does appear clumsy. Having said that, is this going to cause any sonic change other than volume? For example does it cause the need to redo the room correction? In my mind, the ideal volume change is near or a part of the DSP processing, when the incoming digital signal is upsampled to the internal bit width and rate ("32 Bit Audio, Processing 64 Bit double precision") and a "DSP operation" does the effect of volume control. I assume most DAC with digital volume does that way in the DAC chip.Of course.
I still wouldn't regard it as volume control (think of it more like a sensitivity setting). Each change in the system level setting is far from instantaneous because it manipulates the speaker's DSP configuration registers, not the incoming signal.
I think volume is volume, connected by spdif it will change digitally (not audible because of 24 bit depth), or on the DAC reducing the voltage: a single DA and AD is not audible.In a way I agree, when the system level is changed, it took a second and the UI refreshes. It does appear clumsy. Having said that, is this going to cause any sonic change other than volume? For example does it cause the need to redo the room correction? In my mind, the ideal volume change is near or a part of the DSP processing, when the incoming digital signal is upsampled to the internal bit width and rate ("32 Bit Audio, Processing 64 Bit double precision") and a "DSP operation" does the effect of volume control. I assume most DAC with digital volume does that way in the DAC chip.
If this is not the right place to modify volume, where in the signal path is? Currently my setup is Apple Music playing through Topping E50 and then analog to Neumann. Any recommendation so that I can take advantage of S/PDIF for pure digital path? I am not sure the sonic difference is audible by bypassing an A/D but is curious. Thanks!
Of course not.For example does it cause the need to redo the room correction?
Yes, that's why I control volume digitally with the RME ADI-2 Pro.In my mind, the ideal volume change is near or a part of the DSP processing, when the incoming digital signal is upsampled to the internal bit width and rate ("32 Bit Audio, Processing 64 Bit double precision") and a "DSP operation" does the effect of volume control.
Most probably it's less sophisticated fixed-point calculation with filtering/anti-aliasing,I assume most DAC with digital volume does that way in the DAC chip.
At the source.If this is not the right place to modify volume, where in the signal path is?
?there are bits dedicated to that to preserve fidelity
They do.Does Neumann speakers expose their API for others to program?
There are already a few projects on GitHub:If I could make a little/sleek UI talking into the API, it might make adjusting System Level more smoothly.
Thanks! This is amazing!They do.
There are already a few projects on GitHub:
GitHub - jj-wohlgemuth/pyssc: Sennheiser Sound Control Protocol Client Implementation for Python
Sennheiser Sound Control Protocol Client Implementation for Python - jj-wohlgemuth/pysscgithub.comGitHub - schwinn/khtool: Tool to query or change settings of Neumann KH DSP speakers
Tool to query or change settings of Neumann KH DSP speakers - schwinn/khtoolgithub.com
It does not say that. It says that in order for the S/PDIF frame select switches on the speakers to work, the speakers must be set to local control, obviously.In the manual, it says the S/PDIF only works when the Control is set to Local.
Thanks! You are absolutely correct. After my initial MA1 setup, I forgot I have chosen the input methods: automatic, analog, and spdif. It would be nice in the current setup view, it shows the input method chosen. Currently it only shows the speaker serial no.(left/right), firmware version, logo brightness and auto-standby. Now I use the setup name to include the input method to remind myself.It does not say that. It says that in order for the S/PDIF frame select switches on the speakers to work, the speakers must be set to local control, obviously.
In the MA 1, when you define a new setup, you select which speaker should reproduce the left channel and which − the right channel, and also select the input (digital, analog, default).
Refer to the MA 1 manual.