• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Need Direction in upgrading my theater

In reality, this was true for old Dolby systems pre-mastered in their channels. Atmos is object-based and does not benefit from wide dispersion. On the contrary, it has better results with directional speakers, because the sensation of three-dimensionality and the ability to virtualize an object comes from the precise distribution of the sound that the decoder sets for your Atmos configuration. The fewer reflections there are, the more precise the spatial positioning is, which is why classic dipole speakers are no longer used in modern Atmos configurations.
This makes perfect sense to me.
 
In reality, this was true for old Dolby systems pre-mastered in their channels. Atmos is object-based and does not benefit from wide dispersion. On the contrary, it has better results with directional speakers, because the sensation of three-dimensionality and the ability to virtualize an object comes from the precise distribution of the sound that the decoder sets for your Atmos configuration. The fewer reflections there are, the more precise the spatial positioning is, which is why classic dipole speakers are no longer used in modern Atmos configurations.
bs dolby labs atmos isn't ain't a 3d spatial other than 15 years of lies of snake oil mixers on dub stages to encoding this fade flawed fake 3d into being decoded with even more lies of marketing hype by sleazy actors/directors in hollywood , it ain't a 3d sound format otherwise where is the multi channel below surround or in-floor speakers for below surround then , huh ? huh ? huh ? even you haven't a clue ? about it ?

dolby cp850 950 decoders are junk , dub stages are junk , trinnov , stormaudio jbl , anthem , marataz , denon , yamaha , onkyo the whole lot are junk
 
Il Dolby Labs Atmos non è un suono spaziale 3D, a parte 15 anni di bugie di imbroglioni nei teatri di doppiaggio per codificare questo finto 3D difettoso che viene decodificato con ancora più bugie di marketing da parte di attori/registi squallidi di Hollywood, non è un formato audio 3D altrimenti dove sono i diffusori multicanale sotto il surround o a pavimento per il sotto il surround allora, eh? eh? eh? nemmeno tu ne hai la minima idea? a riguardo?

I decoder Dolby CP850 e 950 sono spazzatura, i Dub Stage sono spazzatura, Trinnov, StormAudio, JBL, Anthem, Marataz, Denon, Yamaha, Onkyo, tutta la roba è spazzatura.

Wow, do you need some chamomile tea?
 
bs dolby labs atmos isn't ain't a 3d spatial other than 15 years of lies of snake oil mixers on dub stages to encoding this fade flawed fake 3d into being decoded with even more lies of marketing hype by sleazy actors/directors in hollywood , it ain't a 3d sound format otherwise where is the multi channel below surround or in-floor speakers for below surround then , huh ? huh ? huh ? even you haven't a clue ? about it ?

dolby cp850 950 decoders are junk , dub stages are junk , trinnov , stormaudio jbl , anthem , marataz , denon , yamaha , onkyo the whole lot are junk

If you’re going to reply could you make an effort to be coherent please?
 
it ain't a 3d sound format otherwise where is the multi channel below surround or in-floor speakers for below surround then , huh ?
While the object representation of Atmos is in 3D space, it really is only hemispherical, and the ground plane is somewhere at ear level.
Humans localize mostly in the horizontal plane. In nature sounds rarely come from below, so we're not good at detecting it anyway
It's just too much hassle for a format that should work in so many environments. Overhead support is already enough of an issue.
even you haven't a clue ? about it ?
Seems we do, actually...
 
Back
Top Bottom