digitalfrost
Major Contributor
Yes it does because you can use the NAE sliders in stereo as well to choose the amount of front and ambience you hear, the rear channels are not needed. NAE internally separates the input into principal and ambient stereo components, adjusts their relative levels, recombines them into the same two output channels, and then applies the front-dipole XTC. So it's not simply front = only front, rear = only ambience.
The extracted ambience is reproduced by the front speakers, where XTC helps it sound less localized. This is also the single-dipole configuration described in https://github.com/raul-fernandez-o...ion-of-nae-to-single--or-dual-dipole-natambio
Two instances of the current plug-in would not reproduce the intended four-channel arrangement. One, you cannot fully mute front or ambience at the moment, but more importantly, both instances would use the frontal/alpha NAE mode. The intended rear feed uses the separate beta mode, outputs only its ambient component, and applies XTC configured for the rear dipole. A genuine rear implementation would therefore need an explicit rear path either a 2-in 4-out version or a dedicated plugin just for rear-output variant.
So the short answer is: front-only NAE is intentional; the rear dipole remains a possible future extension.
The extracted ambience is reproduced by the front speakers, where XTC helps it sound less localized. This is also the single-dipole configuration described in https://github.com/raul-fernandez-o...ion-of-nae-to-single--or-dual-dipole-natambio
Two instances of the current plug-in would not reproduce the intended four-channel arrangement. One, you cannot fully mute front or ambience at the moment, but more importantly, both instances would use the frontal/alpha NAE mode. The intended rear feed uses the separate beta mode, outputs only its ambient component, and applies XTC configured for the rear dipole. A genuine rear implementation would therefore need an explicit rear path either a 2-in 4-out version or a dedicated plugin just for rear-output variant.
So the short answer is: front-only NAE is intentional; the rear dipole remains a possible future extension.