• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

NAD M28 Seven Channel Power Amplifier Review

Dj7675

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
2,142
Likes
2,816
Can a speaker make the frequency response of the amp not flat in a well designed amp? It does make it hard if you don’t have measuring equipment. If you did, you could simply measure the frequency response of two amps to see if anything looks differently. It is really hard (at least for me) to hear those kinds of things.
 

Attachments

  • 544B8666-E368-4844-82F5-DCCF6B65F358.png
    544B8666-E368-4844-82F5-DCCF6B65F358.png
    18.1 KB · Views: 120

JimB

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 19, 2019
Messages
731
Likes
493
Location
California
Can a speaker make the frequency response of the amp not flat in a well designed amp? It does make it hard if you don’t have measuring equipment. If you did, you could simply measure the frequency response of two amps to see if anything looks differently. It is really hard (at least for me) to hear those kinds of things.
I think the key realization is that certain combinations of amp and speaker can result in different response than other combinations. There is some debate here as to the limits of a "well designed amp". Is it one that is optimized for common real-world conditions? Or is it one that will cope with virtually anything, no matter how extreme and rare.
 

Dj7675

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
2,142
Likes
2,816
I think the key realization is that certain combinations of amp and speaker can result in different response than other combinations. There is some debate here as to the limits of a "well designed amp". Is it one that is optimized for common real-world conditions? Or is it one that will cope with virtually anything, no matter how extreme and rare.
In this particular case though, would we expect this amp to deviate from a flat frequency response with his speaker (B&W CM10S2)?
Note this is not some kind of debate thing. I really don’t know :) I would have thought it could handle about any speaker and not have any difficulty.
 

Kal Rubinson

Master Contributor
Industry Insider
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
5,303
Likes
9,865
Location
NYC
I tested the M28 with the M17V2 processor and my B&W CM10S2s and found the 2k region over emphasised. Hi hats were too in your face and the treble has a chirpyness too it, like the sound was smeared (sorry about the terms, best I can think of).
I could not find any measurements for the CM10S2 but found this for its predecessor which suggests the hi-hats in your face and the chirpyness may be innate.
114bwsp.meas.jpg
 

Dj7675

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
2,142
Likes
2,816
@AndyBeckett it may make more sense to experiment with a little EQ to tame any bright/fatiguing issues with your speakers rather than swapping your amp. It doesn’t seem likely (could be wrong) that changing an amp will get rid of that.
 

AndyBeckett

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
19
Likes
13
My existing amp is a Rotel RB-1080, I wonder if that has a corresponding drop in response that compensates for the exuberance of the CM10s. They are designed to work well together since B&W and Rotel have a close connection.
 

Kal Rubinson

Master Contributor
Industry Insider
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
5,303
Likes
9,865
Location
NYC

Descartes

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
Messages
2,142
Likes
1,103
Agreed. All the NAD specs are for the dimensions of the M28 chassis but the weight is specified as "Shipping Weight." I can say that when I replaced my old 65lb. Bryston 9B with the M28, it seemed about half the weight. Of course, that's merely a subjective assessment. :)

Is that what power your Revel Studio 2?
 

SnakeOil

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2021
Messages
18
Likes
0
Anyone here have any experience with the Emotiva XPA 7 Gen 3? I was wondering if replacing it with NAD M28 would make a significant
Difference. They both have 7 channels and 200 watts per channel. The NAD retails for about $ 2900 more
 

Kal Rubinson

Master Contributor
Industry Insider
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
5,303
Likes
9,865
Location
NYC
Anyone here have any experience with the Emotiva XPA 7 Gen 3? I was wondering if replacing it with NAD M28 would make a significant
Difference. They both have 7 channels and 200 watts per channel. The NAD retails for about $ 2900 more
Not an audible one, I suspect.
 

Vovgan

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
189
Likes
347
Location
Moscow, Russia
Okay so this is for the benefit of those of you who like me are pondering whether to buy a good external amp like NAD M28 to use instead of built-in amps in your Denon AVR (which are objectively good buy not as good as NAD’s).

I bought this NAD and had it for ~ 10 days or something. Initial impression has not changed: no perceptible difference in sound quality except at my peak listening levels in movies ( volume ~ 74 on Denon x6500) when NAD somehow is not harsh at all but Denon just a bit is. Why it is the case I don’t know, obviously Denon’s amps are not clipping at this volume. I had the same experience - zero perceived change in sound quality - upgrading to x6500 from x4500, while the upgrade from x3400 to x4500 brought a very substantial reduction in audible noise (x3400 must have been pretty lame).
 

Attachments

  • B16FBD3A-639E-4C75-BEDC-B5FC73776D39.jpeg
    B16FBD3A-639E-4C75-BEDC-B5FC73776D39.jpeg
    196.7 KB · Views: 165
  • 5B7CA4EE-1ADD-45CA-89B4-3E3BBA41BF05.jpeg
    5B7CA4EE-1ADD-45CA-89B4-3E3BBA41BF05.jpeg
    290.8 KB · Views: 182
Last edited:
Top Bottom