• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

MZX Audio PHO-NR1 Phono Stage Review

Rate this phono stage:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 9 7.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 44 34.4%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 62 48.4%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 13 10.2%

  • Total voters
    128

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
49,226
Likes
291,207
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the MZX Audio PHO-NR1 stereo balanced phono preamplifier. It was sent to me by the company and costs 339.000 Hungarian Forint or about USD $1,017.
MZX Audio PHO-NR1 True Balanced MC MM Phono Preamplifier Stereo Review.jpg

I have taken the top off for reasons mentioned below. The front and back panels are plexiglass while top and bottom are fairly thick machined aluminum, giving the unit a rather solid feel. The sole LED communicates something about the settings which I did not bother to learn. What I did have to learn was how to change the gain setting which required getting inside the unit. Documentation is provided on the dip switches but not how to open the unit. I guessed that the four upper screws might let the upper shell and fortunately, I was right:
MZX Audio PHO-NR1 True Balanced MC MM Phono Preamplifier Stereo inside dip switches Review.jpg

I really wished the switches were mounted underneath the PCB with a cut out in the case so that you could change them without opening the unit. While the high voltage wires have good sleeves over them, there is still some chance of electrical shock should the owner not unplug the unit.

I had to change the dip switches because the default gain is whopping 72 dB! The input loading is also a very low 1 K Ohm. Even though the unit is advertised as supporting Moving Coil cartridge support, the lowest gain is 52 dB which in my opinion is too high. Since there was nothing lower, that is how I tested the unit.

A nice Meanwell switching power supply is on the left. Unit can be powered with a linear power supply which based on my testing, is completely unnecessary and may make things worse.

My favorite feature is highlighted in the back:
MZX Audio PHO-NR1 True Balanced MC MM Phono Preamplifier Stereo back panel Review.jpg


Yes, we have balanced input and outputs which is rare in this category. I like it due to higher immunity it provides for hum and buzz. My testing showed total absence of such which is usually a major chore in testing phono stages.

MZX Audio PHO-NR1 Phono Stage Measurements
Using my standard 5 mv input level showed an output that was 2 volts. This is double of what I typically see and would create an unfair comparison. I lowered that to 2.5 millivolt to compensate for the higher gain:
MZX Audio PHO-NR1 True Balanced MC MM Phono Preamplifier Stereo Measurement.png


Output spectrum is very clean, devoid of any distortion products. Channel matching/gain is superb as well. Ranking is way up the chart:
best balanced stereo phono stage review 2025.png


Frequency response showed a response with fair amount of peaking in bass:
MZX Audio PHO-NR1 True Balanced MC MM Phono Preamplifier Stereo Frequency Response RIAA Equali...png

I like the high pass filtering but the rise from 30 to 100 Hz could interact with room modes and could cause fair amount of bloat. Or may make a bright speaker more balanced. Somewhat a crapshoot so wished it was not there or so pronounced.

Headroom measurement comparison is difficult since the 52 dB gain is in between what we see in MM (45 dB or so) and MC (60+ dB):
MZX Audio PHO-NR1 True Balanced MC MM Phono Preamplifier Stereo input level distortion vs freq...png

Mentally interpreting, it seems fine to me.

What is way beyond fine and falling in state of the art performance is the extremely low distortion:
MZX Audio PHO-NR1 True Balanced MC MM Phono Preamplifier Stereo THD vs Frequency Measurement.png


While this would be falling on deaf ears of the LP format itself, it is nevertheless nice to see as a show of engineering prowess.

Conclusions
The PRO-NR1 takes the proper approach in producing a balanced input to output phono stage. Very few companies recognize the importance of this architecture and for that, I commend the company. Overall performance ranks from good to excellent with the exception of low frequency response. As noted, having a high pass filter to reduce rumble is good but that peaking should be better controlled.

I can't recommend the MZX Audio PRO-NR1 because of that filter error. Otherwise, the rest of the design is commendable.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Appreciate any donations using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Last edited:
Hello,

I also reviewed this phono preamp, and to be honest, I didn’t notice this bass extension by ear during my review. Moreover, I recorded samples for A/B testing using both this MZX phono and a Pro-Ject phono. You can find the Audacity project files below if you’re interested. Could it be that this “overshoot” is impedance-dependent? (Not that it would be all right even then.) or maybe it's a measurement error?

Audacity Test tracks:
Project Phono Box vs. MZX PHO-NR1

Link to my video (English subtitels available):
MZX PHO-NR1: Blasphemy or salvation? #MZXAUDIO (w/Eng_Sub)
 
It looks like a very well designed device, except for one detail.

Since we endorse EQ adjustments for headphones, which can turn a “not recommended” headphone into a “recommended” one after EQ, why don’t we apply the same logic here?
 
Could it be that this “overshoot” is impedance-dependent? (Not that it would be all right even then.) or maybe it's a measurement error?
High frequency can be dependent on impedance but what is there is low frequency and typical signature of some high pass filters. The designer is on the forum and I am hoping can address this more.
 
Since we endorse EQ adjustments for headphones, which can turn a “not recommended” headphone into a “recommended” one after EQ, why don’t we apply the same logic here?
People into LPs tend to have pure analog paths and absence of EQ. So can't apply the same logic here.
 
This is a review and detailed measurements of the MZX Audio PHO-NR1 stereo balanced phono preamplifier. It was sent to me by the company and costs 339.000 Hungarian Forint or about USD $1,017.
View attachment 486040
I have taken the top off for reasons mentioned below. The front and back panels are plexiglass while top and bottom are fairly thick machined aluminum, giving the unit a rather solid feel. The sole LED communicates something about the settings which I did not bother to learn. What I did have to learn was how to change the gain setting which required getting inside the unit. Documentation is provided on the dip switches but not how to open the unit. I guessed that the four upper screws might let the upper shell and fortunately, I was right:
View attachment 486058
I really wished the switches were mounted underneath the PCB with a cut out in the case so that you could change them without opening the unit. While the high voltage wires have good sleeves over them, there is still some chance of electrical shock should the owner not unplug the unit.

I had to change the dip switches because the default gain is whopping 72 dB! The input loading is also a very low 1 kHz. Even though the unit is advertised as supporting Moving Coil cartridge support, the lowest gain is 52 dB which in my opinion is too high. Since there was nothing lower, that is how I tested the unit.

A nice Meanwell switching power supply is on the left. Unit can be powered with a linear power supply which based on my testing, is completely unnecessary and may make things worse.

My favorite feature is highlighted in the back:
View attachment 486059

Yes, we have balanced input and outputs which is rare in this category. I like it due to higher immunity it provides for hum and buzz. My testing showed total absence of such which is usually a major chore in testing phono stages.

MZX Audio PHO-NR1 Phono Stage Measurements
Using my standard 5 mv input level showed an output that was 2 volts. This is double of what I typically see and would create an unfair comparison. I lowered that to 2.5 volt to compensate for the higher gain:
View attachment 486060

Output spectrum is very clean, devoid of any distortion products. Channel matching/gain is superb as well. Ranking is way up the chart:
View attachment 486061

Frequency response showed a response with fair amount of peaking in bass:
View attachment 486062
I like the high pass filtering but the rise from 30 to 100 Hz could interact with room modes and could cause fair amount of bloat. Or may make a bright speaker more balanced. Somewhat a crapshoot so wished it was not there or so pronounced.

Headroom measurement comparison is difficult since the 52 dB gain is in between what we see in MM (45 dB or so) and MC (60+ dB):
View attachment 486063
Mentally interpreting, it seems fine to me.

What is way beyond fine and falling in state of the art performance is the extremely low distortion:
View attachment 486064

While this would be falling on deaf ears of the LP format itself, it is nevertheless nice to see as a show of engineering prowess.

Conclusions
The PRO-NR1 takes the proper approach in producing a balanced input to output phono stage. Very few companies recognize the importance of this architecture and for that, I commend the company. Overall performance ranks from good to excellent with the exception of low frequency response. As noted, having a high pass filter to reduce rumble is good but that peaking should be better controlled.

I can't recommend the MZX Audio PRO-NR1 because of that filter error. Otherwise, the rest of the design is commendable.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Appreciate any donations using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
So good in many ways but the default very high gain combined with lack of easy access to the dip switches is a major issue. BTW you said "I lowered that to 2.5 volt to compensate"; shouldn't that be 2.5 mV?
 
It looks like a very well designed device, except for one detail.

Since we endorse EQ adjustments for headphones, which can turn a “not recommended” headphone into a “recommended” one after EQ, why don’t we apply the same logic here?
The frequency response of headphones depend a lot on the fixture of the individual head, hence using EQ makes always sense, even for those headphones like the AKG K371.

In electronics a filter design with an overshoot is either a design error, or one or more of the filter components have the wrong value (production error). You could use EQ to fix it but there are enough phono preamps on the market with correct frequency response.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the review. I keep telling myself that I'm not interested in vinyl kit anymore ... but I keep looking :)

Looks cute, and balanced connections are nice - but it's too expensive to have that low end FR error, and I couldn't be bothered with those hidden dip switches.
 
Hello,

I also reviewed this phono preamp, and to be honest, I didn’t notice this bass extension by ear during my review. Moreover, I recorded samples for A/B testing using both this MZX phono and a Pro-Ject phono. You can find the Audacity project files below if you’re interested. Could it be that this “overshoot” is impedance-dependent? (Not that it would be all right even then.) or maybe it's a measurement error?

Audacity Test tracks:
Project Phono Box vs. MZX PHO-NR1

Link to my video (English subtitels available):
MZX PHO-NR1: Blasphemy or salvation? #MZXAUDIO (w/Eng_Sub)
Thank you for sharing your recordings. It appears to align with @amirm FR data.
I opened the two Daft Punk tracks from your Audacity file in REW, level matched at 1kHz and compared the left side LF.
.
Daft punk comparison.jpg
 
Thanks Amir.
It's fascinating that a phono amp should have such low noise and hum with a cheap but good SMPS.
Phono amps are usually the last vanguard of linear supplies.
Having said that, I'm confused by the MZX website which says the PHO-NR1 has a linear supply.

1761656796362.png
 
Thank you for sharing your recordings. It appears to align with @amirm FR data.
I opened the two Daft Punk tracks from your Audacity file in REW, level matched at 1kHz and compared the left side LF.
.View attachment 486121
Thanks for the effort — that’s quite conclusive. I personally know the designer of this phono stage; he’s a very talented engineer, so I’m quite sure he’ll figure out how to make it look good in the measurements. What do you think about the subjective audibility of this little ‘oopsie’?
I also re-did the comparison between the two test tracks, and I’m still not convinced that this issue is audible at all.
Reading my notes again about the subjective comparison of these two phonos, I ‘felt’ that the MZX Phono had slightly tighter bass, with faster decay than the Pro-Ject — but within the margin of error. Most likely, the graph above is good proof that I’m not crazy or deaf... :)
 
Thanks Amir.
It's fascinating that a phono amp should have such low noise and hum with a cheap but good SMPS.
Phono amps are usually the last vanguard of linear supplies.
Having said that, I'm confused by the MZX website which says the PHO-NR1 has a linear supply.

View attachment 486122
You can order the phono with either an SMPSU or an LPSU. I tend to agree with Amir that the PSU design around the SMPSU is already robust enough, which makes the LPSU version somewhat redundant. It’s not just about the quality of the medical-grade Mean Well SMPSU — there’s also additional filtering and linear stabilization on top of the off-the-shelf supply. This is why MZX refers to this PSU design as a hybrid: it incorporates both switching and linear stages to achieve an exceptionally low noise floor.
 
PHO-NR1 has a linear supply
Model encoding example: PHO-NR1-T50-BBB 1st digit: Front = Black; 2nd digit: Case = Black; 3rd digit: Back plate = Black Power Supply Type & Wattage: T50 = Toroid 50VA or H30 = Hybrid 30W Generation = Numero One Series name = PHO (Phono)
This must be a PHO-NR1-H30.


JSmith
 
Back
Top Bottom