Umm, what is going on here?
This is "L reflowed XO" (green) vs. "L recrimped connectors" (yellow). We expect and want the two FR's to be the same, and they are. So no problem here.
This is "R reflowed XO" (red) vs. "R recrimped connectors" (blue). These measurements are obviously not identical. You can see two problems. First, there is a dip in the blue measurement at about 600Hz. Second, there is a huge bass drop-off.
If you compare the step response of "R reflowed XO" (red) with "R recrimped connectors" (blue) you will see the problem. The
woofer polarity is inverted in "R recrimped connectors". This explains the dip at 600Hz (crossover phase cancellation) but does not explain the huge bass drop-off. I don't know what is causing that.
Re
@Sokel's point about taking them outdoors for a quasi-anechoic measurement. If you look at the Energy-Time Curve, you can see a LOT of loud and early reflections. Not to mention, you are also measuring loud enough to create a lot of driver distortion. If you want to improve your signal-noise ratio (SNR), it is better to take a longer measurement (1M) instead of a louder measurement.
If you plan to correct your speaker response with DSP, taking a quality measurement is vital. But working with a passive XO, you do not need such a high quality measurement since possible interventions are more limited. Regardless, this isn't a very good measurement - it is obvious the measurement was taken in a smallish room, or a very cluttered room. And there is too much distortion. You are probably measuring loud enough to push the speaker into nonlinear territory. About the only good thing we can say about the measurement is that the SNR is very low.