• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

"Musmys" E-406 clone amp, a HiFi newbie's review =)

It's been a few weeks, have you received your Musmys set yet? I'd love to hear some feedback from your experience =)

I did get it. and I liked it a lot. but I saw the reviews for the tube preamp and the stronger amps they released and sold the 406 and am still planning on one of the bigger chinese hifi amps. the 406 did sound nice. but i am happy with the cary slp90 clone im running now.
 
I did get it. and I liked it a lot. but I saw the reviews for the tube preamp and the stronger amps they released and sold the 406 and am still planning on one of the bigger chinese hifi amps. the 406 did sound nice. but i am happy with the cary slp90 clone im running now.

which are the preamp/stronger amps youre referring to?
 
I believe you mean " politically correctness succeeding at its real goal"

I have never heard anyone get upset over it. its inanimate objects we are talking about not human beings. I hope you are living life a little more relaxed than this in general.

im 1/2 Puerto Rican. I have been insulted by Americans and Puerto Ricans . this is not the same. not the same at all. but I am going to go home and see if I cant humiliate my 2860+ clone by calling him the C word.

chi-fi and Kraut-fi arent even the same. is Chinese an insult? Kraut is not a country.
Just don’t use the term. Per our host’s instructions;


If common decency is too politically correct for you and you cannot avoid using inflammatory language, don’t post here.
 
Just don’t use the term. Per our host’s instructions;


If common decency is too politically correct for you and you cannot avoid using inflammatory language, don’t post here.

it was already done and over. smh.
 
Any update on this, I do really like the look of these seperates!
I have not purchased a bi-ampable speaker set yet... trying to save up for a pair of Martin Logan Classic ESL-9s (I currently have ESLs only, which can't be bi-amped)
 
Can you two quit it, all youre going to achieve is getting this thread closed down and I feel its useful for peope considering this amp.
Useful, how so?
I was hoping someone would test one of these to see if it had any performance at all.
Can you point to any useful info about these in this thread? Or anywhere.
 
I have not purchased a bi-ampable speaker set yet... trying to save up for a pair of Martin Logan Classic ESL-9s (I currently have ESLs only, which can't be bi-amped)
Unless you’re intending to bypass the analog crossover and go fully active, there’s zero benefit from bi-amping.
 
Unless you’re intending to bypass the analog crossover and go fully active, there’s zero benefit from bi-amping.

If I were to use a miniDSP 2x4 HD or a miniDSP Flex and two Musmys E406 into Kef 105/3, is there anyway of predicting how impactful the benefit would be?

I'm still very much a newbie to the science of hifi but i'm assuming that bypassing conjugate load matching passive crossover in the 105/3 isnt straight forward?
 
If I were to use a miniDSP 2x4 HD or a miniDSP Flex and two Musmys E406 into Kef 105/3, is there anyway of predicting how impactful the benefit would be?

I'm still very much a newbie to the science of hifi but i'm assuming that bypassing conjugate load matching passive crossover in the 105/3 isnt straight forward?
Quite a lot to unpack here.
-we have no measurements at all of the mumsie. No idea if any of its specs are accurate. So perhaps the most beneficial thing of all would be to forget about it and get an amp that you actually know is good.
- replacing an analog crossover with a digital one gives you great flexibility. But unless you know what you’re doing, that flexibility also allows you to really mess up the result (bearing in mind that KEF probably had a pretty good idea of what they were doing in the first place, so what exactly are you trying to improve from the original design?)
 
Quite a lot to unpack here.
-we have no measurements at all of the mumsie. No idea if any of its specs are accurate. So perhaps the most beneficial thing of all would be to forget about it and get an amp that you actually know is good.
- replacing an analog crossover with a digital one gives you great flexibility. But unless you know what you’re doing, that flexibility also allows you to really mess up the result (bearing in mind that KEF probably had a pretty good idea of what they were doing in the first place, so what exactly are you trying to improve from the original design?)

What measurements would help us understand if it's a good amp or not, i'm happy to do so if the equipment required is reasonably cheap?
REW (Room EQ Wizard) or Visual Analyser would give real-time graphs for distortion (THD), frequency response, and clipping right?

Sorry I was responding to your comment around benefit from bi-amping, I was wondering how it would work on a non standard crossover and if it would be of real world benefit.
 
I got mine last week and im super pleased with it!
congrats... it's a LOT of amplifier for the money! I've been really happy with my bi-amp set, have owned them for over a year now & they have performed flawlessly. Do tell us how well it works with your KEF speakers & compare the E406 with the amp it replaced. =)
 
Last edited:
I've recently purchased one of these amps to allow me to refurbish a 1982 hand-built MOS-FET [SJ49/SK50], that is now ready for a cap upgrade.

Although ostensibly my e-406 looks like the same amplifier, it is not. It does not use FETS and it is Symmetrical and uses NJW0302/0281 BJT pairs.

It still has 6 pairs in parallel [So will have some grunt] and it sounds very powerful and detailed but I have not really had the chance to investigate the design further; whereas I came to believe that the previous version shown on here was based on the Legend/Stagemaster designed by Dr Borivoje Jagodic {https://electronicscheme.net/500w-rms-power-amplifier-based-mosfet/] {My postulation}

I've attached a photo of one of the channels showing the new array. Note the annotation on the PWA. The devices have the same part numbers.

Unfortunately, when I opened my device up I did not note the major change as they look, layout wise, the same. I will now investigate further.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20260812_133255_hdr.jpg
    IMG_20260812_133255_hdr.jpg
    579 KB · Views: 45
I've recently purchased one of these amps to allow me to refurbish a 1982 hand-built MOS-FET [SJ49/SK50], that is now ready for a cap upgrade.

Although ostensibly my e-406 looks like the same amplifier, it is not. It does not use FETS and it is Symmetrical and uses NJW0302/0281 BJT pairs.

It still has 6 pairs in parallel [So will have some grunt] and it sounds very powerful and detailed but I have not really had the chance to investigate the design further; whereas I came to believe that the previous version shown on here was based on the Legend/Stagemaster designed by Dr Borivoje Jagodic {https://electronicscheme.net/500w-rms-power-amplifier-based-mosfet/] {My postulation}

I've attached a photo of one of the channels showing the new array. Note the annotation on the PWA. The devices have the same part numbers.

Unfortunately, when I opened my device up I did not note the major change as they look, layout wise, the same. I will now investigate further.

Is yours branded as Musmys?

I could take some photos of the inside of mine to see if there's some variation?
 
Back
Top Bottom