• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Music Hall pa2.2 ADC/Phono Stage Review

Rate this phono stage/digitizer:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 136 100.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    136

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
49,625
Likes
294,541
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Music Hall pa2.2 ADC (digitizer) USB Phono Stage. It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $449.
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP USB review.jpg

Controls are easy to use, being just toggle switches. An external adapter is provided for power:
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP back panel power supply review.jpg

Nice to see independent input for general digitization. You also have independent inputs for moving coil/magnet. I only tested the unit as digitizer. Not sure if line out is an analog pass through or for output from USB input (did not test this aspect).

There were no drivers on the company website so I used my ASIO4ALL emulation over Windows class driver.

Music Hall pa2.2 Measurements
I started out just testing it as a line input. The input saturated rather early at just 1.5 volt input:
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP line in dashboard measurement.png


It is not going to win any awards as an ADC, finishing near last with all the distortion it has:
Best LP digitizer review 2025.png

But that is not the worst problem. That title belongs to timing mismatch between the two channels. Left and right sine waves should be on top of each other and they are not. If I increase the test frequency to 20 kHz, the delay mismatch becomes much closer to the wavelength of the tone:
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP line in dashboard phase shift at 20 kHz...png

In other words, by the time you get to 20 kHz, the two channels will be completely out of phase! This could be a firmware issue and fixable. As is, it makes the rest of the review academic but let's test a bit more in case they fix this:
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP line in dynamic range measurement.png

Company has rather detailed specs and shows an incredible value of 120 dB which would be state of the art. Needless to say, we are not even in the same planet. Maybe that is a chip spec.

ADC input bandwidth is a bit above audible band:
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP line in frequency response measurement.png


192 kHz did nothing different from 96 kHz.

Let's switch to MM phono input:
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP MM dashboard measurement.png


Strange that the low frequency noise is flat. SINAD of 45 dB would tie it for the worst phono stage ever tested! And our channel mismatch as far as timing remains.

RIAA equalization is respectable:
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP frequency response measurement.png


Headroom is not, and strangely, is worse at lower frequencies:
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP MM THD vs input level measurement.png


Digging in, we see that it is the negative supply that runs out:
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP MM distortion negative rail measurement.png


I lost the will to live, I mean to test more....

Conclusions
I expect competent implementation from Music Hall. The pa2.2 bucks that trend, demonstrating clear implementation bug and performance is quite sub-par. Other than good RIAA equalization, I can't think of anything positive about it. If it were a $150 device, we could cut it some slack but at nearly $500? No way. You can buy an audio interface with a phono stage for much less money and far better performance.

I can't recommend the Music Hall pa2.2. I hope the company at least fixes the timing problem.

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Specs:

MM input impedance: 47 kohms+ 220 pF
MC input impedance: 100 ohms + 1 pF
Analog line-level input impedance: 47 kohms
MM gain at 1kHz: 39 dB
MC gain at 1kHz: 59 dB (20 dB gain selected) / 65 dB (26 dB gain selected)
MM input sensitivity for 316 mV output: 3.3 mV
MC input sensitivity for 316 mV output: 0.4 mV (20 dB gain selected) / 0.2 mV (26 dB gain selected)
MM signal-to-noise ratio unweighted (with cartridge connected): 70 dB
MC signal-to-noise ratio unweighted (with cartridge connected): 75 dB (20 dB gain) / 70 dB (26 dB gain)
Analog Line-level input Signal-to-noise ratio: 120 dB
MM Input overload level at 20Hz/1kHz/20kHz: 8/71/650 mV
MC Input overload level at 20Hz/1kHz/20kHz (20 dB gain selected): 0.95/48/450 mV
MC Input overload level at 20Hz/1kHz/20kHz (26 dB gain selected): 0.45/24/225 mV
MM Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (10 mV in): <0.01%
MC Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (1 mV in and 20 dB gain selected): <0.05%
MC Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (1 mV in and 26 dB gain selected): <0.05%
Analog line-level input total harmonic distortion + noise: <0.01%
RIAA curve accuracy: +/- 0.3 dB
MM Crosstalk: 65 dB
MC Crosstalk: 65 dB (20 dB gain) / 60 dB (26 dB gain)
Line-level input crosstalk: 63 dB
Fixed line-level output impedance: 270 ohms
Variable line-level output impedance: 270 ohms
Headphone stage output impedance: 2 ohms
Headphone stage maximum output level: 6.8 V
Headphone stage total harmonic distortion + noise: <0.02%
USB output: maximum 24 bit linear PCM
USB output sampling frequency: maximum 96 kHz
Power Supply Rejection Ratio: 80 dB
Power supply: external 24VDC with multi-region plug adaptors
Power consumption without signal: 2.9 W
Dimensions (WxHx D): 6.3" x 2.0" x 6.7" (159 x 51 x 171 mm)
Unit weight: 2lbs. (900g)
Input Connections: 3 pairs of RCA sockets (left/right) 1 x MM, 1 x MC, 1 x Line
Output Connections: 2 pair of RCA sockets (left/right) 1 x variable, 1x fixed 1 x headphone output 32 - 600Ω
A/D Converter: Wolfson WM 8786, Tenor TE7022L 24Bit Delta Sigma
Sampling Rates: 8, 16, 32, 44.1, 48, 96kHz
USB Output: USB 2.0
 
I wonder if ASR gives any of these companies pause... to release something costly and with bad specs would have flown years ago, but now the buck stops here. Maybe they just hope they can fly below the radar and make a lot of sales on Amazon or wherever these are sold. Or I guess door number two, is it possible they design and build something and don't test it?
 
Let's hope they take notice. With those detailed specs, it tells me they have some measurement capability. They just need to establish targets.
 
Thanks Amir.
Sometimes a comprehensive set of specifications is a good sign.....but not this time.
I'll add it to my phono amp table - probably near the bottom.
I couldn't tell what the measured MM gain was, so I used the 39dB spec.

1759478527875.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
View attachment 480163
Company has rather detailed specs and shows an incredible value of 120 dB which would be state of the art. Needless to say, we are not even in the same planet. Maybe that is a chip spec.
Or maybe this 120 dB number is actually not a signal to noise ratio measurement, but the floor of the noise relative to full scale input displayed on an FFT of the signal. Devialet once used the same trick to claim an unweighted 130 dB signal to noise ratio for its D-Premier power amplifier as exemplified by French blogger @jipihorn in a very good video (from 19'18''). This practice is as misleading as listing the manufacturer's specifications for a single component of a device and implying that these are the specifications for the entire device.
 
Last edited:
That’s exceptional poor performance (Just look at the MM SINAD - factor 1000 worse
than the Fosi Audio Box X5 Phono Pre!!!). :facepalm:
Sorry for every guy who bought one and literally burn US $500!
 
Or maybe this 120 dB number is actually not a signal to noise ratio measurement, but the floor of the noise relative to full scale input displayed on an FFT of the signal. Devialet once used the same trick to claim an unweighted 130 dB signal to noise ratio for its D-Premier power amplifier as exemplified by French blogger @jipihorn in a very good video (from 19'18''). This practice is as misleading as listing the manufacturer's specifications for a single component of a device and implying that these are the specifications for the entire device.
It is incredibly how much I have learned about Devialet from this forum! Thank you @amirm and thank you @Scytales!
No joke: I was soooooooo close to buy one of their amps, (to switch from SONOS) bevor I even heared of the existence of this forum!
You guys saved me EUR 8.000,— and much software frustration!
So, other than @amirm I haven’t lost my will to live… ;)

thorsten (happy WiiM Pro Plus, Topping B100 and roon user!)
 
That is horrendous clipping on the negative rail. I haven't seen anything that bad since I was testing things 30 years ago! I am impressed at just how bad that is. I can only guess there is some faulty components in there somewhere. Shocking results.
 
I expect competent implementation from Music Hall.
My experience with a Music Hall TT was disappointing. After a few years and light use its main bearing induced a vibration that made the whole thing useless. Later I read a interview that gave me the impression that Music Hall isn't an engineering operation. It seemed more like an import and trading firm that had arranged branding with one or more supplier.
 
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Music Hall pa2.2 ADC (digitizer) USB Phono Stage. It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $449.
View attachment 480158
Controls are easy to use, being just toggle switches. An external adapter is provided for power:
View attachment 480159
Nice to see independent input for general digitization. You also have independent inputs for moving coil/magnet. I only tested the unit as digitizer. Not sure if line out is an analog pass through or for output from USB input (did not test this aspect).

There were no drivers on the company website so I used my ASIO4ALL emulation over Windows class driver.

Music Hall pa2.2 Measurements
I started out just testing it as a line input. The input saturated rather early at just 1.5 volt input:
View attachment 480160

It is not going to win any awards as an ADC, finishing near last with all the distortion it has:
View attachment 480161
But that is not the worst problem. That title belongs to timing mismatch between the two channels. Left and right sine waves should be on top of each other and they are not. If I increase the test frequency to 20 kHz, the delay mismatch becomes much closer to the wavelength of the tone:
View attachment 480162
In other words, by the time you get to 20 kHz, the two channels will be completely out of phase! This could be a firmware issue and fixable. As is, it makes the rest of the review academic but let's test a bit more in case they fix this:
View attachment 480163
Company has rather detailed specs and shows an incredible value of 120 dB which would be state of the art. Needless to say, we are not even in the same planet. Maybe that is a chip spec.

ADC input bandwidth is a bit above audible band:
View attachment 480164

192 kHz did nothing different from 96 kHz.

Let's switch to MM phono input:
View attachment 480165

Strange that the low frequency noise is flat. SINAD of 45 dB would tie it for the worst phono stage ever tested! And our channel mismatch as far as timing remains.

RIAA equalization is respectable:
View attachment 480167

Headroom is not, and strangely, is worse at lower frequencies:
View attachment 480168

Digging in, we see that it is the negative supply that runs out:
View attachment 480169

I lost the will to live, I mean to test more....

Conclusions
I expect competent implementation from Music Hall. The pa2.2 bucks that trend, demonstrating clear implementation bug and performance is quite sub-par. Other than good RIAA equalization, I can't think of anything positive about it. If it were a $150 device, we could cut it some slack but at nearly $500? No way. You can buy an audio interface with a phono stage for much less money and far better performance.

I can't recommend the Music Hall pa2.2. I hope the company at least fixes the timing problem.

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
"
Music Hall pa2.2 ADC Phono Stage MM MC Digitize Rip LP frequency response measurement.png



"Headroom is not, and strangely, is worse at lower frequencies"

I assume that is a function of the RIAA curve -- gain is much higher at low frequencies, right?
 
What a horrible piece of trash from a reputable company... Defective unit????
 
Ouch! Could it be broken - although that doesn't say much for the quality control?
 
Thanks Amirm for debunking these....boutique brands, or what they should be called ?
Keep up the great work !
I nearly bought one a few years ago, glad I did not.
 
Last edited:
If this unit isn't broken, it's just a joke. The industrial design is just as AWOL as the performance. Thanks for the review Amir, You've saved some folks 5 bills on this one.
 
So ass. How do these companies live with themselves churning out landfill products
 
Back
Top Bottom