OK, sure, we can play this game of "well it is proabbly just about as good and I don't hear a difference". Case in point, I use a Behringer UMC1820 in my home to run what I would call more casual loudspeaker systems for my family and not the ones where I am trying for high SQ. Do I hear some differences? No, because in that application the speaker are not set up in a critical way and the UMC1820 is just fine in its role. But the UMC1820 measures much worse, MUCH worse in fact. But it is still much better in terms of distortion compared to my loudspeaker systems, so you do not really notice anything. You can play this game ad nauseam, but most people on this forum care greatly about the performance and SQ of their equipment, and so paying attention to measured performance is also important to them and drives their buying choices.
Accidentally saw your comment just now as i am not that much hanging around here anymore.
I don`t know how the Behringer measures as i am not touching this brand with a ten foot pole.
That said, i thought it is self explanatory but will clarify it a bit as of course i was wrong to assume one can guess what i think so apologies on that.
Of course i mean any decent interface. Not the cheapest possible.
Like an Audiend ID series. Or a Motu Ultralite and so on and so on. In short, relatively affordable but neither Cheapos nor High End cost level.
"but most people on this forum care greatly about the performance and SQ of their equipment“ -
I am not one of the pioneers regarding experience as there are others much longer than me in this. However what i have come to realise in the last 30 years observing others and of course my self, is that wanting-caring about quality
is one thing while actually being able to hear a difference is another.
i have witnessed people, me included, fail miserably when the conditions where more in the direction of a blind test or when chains got re-structured accidentally-without my knowledge.
Also just because one device measures „worse“ than another it does not automatically make it bad sounding. You need to be able to precisely define exactly what it is in the sound that is so bad or else for me its „voodoo“ worth of analysis.
It is this where many many (many) people will fail. We are biased beeings and the entry and medium level equipment has gotten vastly better in the last 30-40 years.
I doubt that 99% of listeners are able to hear a difference in a D/A converter for example. I enjoy the channel on YT by Julian Krause cause he does
no nonsense measurements and without the whole drama. Now that i am writing this however i realise that i have lost my passion to prove anything on the matter.
Partly because one thing i dearly miss in these discussions is a bit of humour. Audiophiles are taking their selves way to seriously
Anyhow. Thats it in a nutshell. Need to cook now.
Cheers and God speed