dasdoing
Major Contributor
Any source for that claim?
my own reasoning as stated later
Because it has no real deep bass
wasn't realy talking about the bass here. those which have a huge decay in the bass are ported
Any source for that claim?
Because it has no real deep bass
Ok, so no research backing up that claim.my own reasoning as stated later
But the difference is in the bass, if bass drops like on that NS-10 there is also no delay in the waterfall, please read the above linked explanation from @KSTR carefully. And such a waterfall plot which pronounces delays at lower frequencies can be optically deceiving, much better is the group delay plot, also regarding to psychoacoustic audibility limits.wasn't realy talking about the bass here.
Not necessarily, a low frequency port tuning can be actually "faster" than the NS-10 where it counts, see here https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...s/transient-response.18745/page-5#post-764348those which have a huge decay in the bass are ported
Ok, so no research backing up that claim.
But the difference is in the bass, if bass drops like on that NS-10 there is also no delay in the waterfall, please read the above linked explanation from @KSTR carefully. And such a waterfall plot which pronounces delays at lower frequencies can be optically deceiving, much better is the group delay plot, also regarding to psychoacoustic audibility limits.
Resonances should be of course avoided, fully agree there, like also seen at many ASR NFS spinorama these can be especially a problem at ported 2-way implementations where not the necessary countermeasures where taken. I thought you were referring on the NS-10 plot to the bass part which shows the biggest difference to other ported designs. Here for example from the same paper a ported 2-way which has also a similar clean waterfall in the mids like the NS-10:If you ever try to mix bad material you will understand how confusing resonance are if you are not sure if they are in the material or in the system. also if the system has a lot of resonances a resonance in the material will actualy be masked
Resonances should be of course avoided, fully agree there, like also seen at many ASR NFS spinorama these can be especially a problem at ported 2-way implementations where not the necessary countermeasures where taken. I thought you were referring on the NS-10 plot to the bass part which shows the biggest difference to other ported designs. Here for example from the same paper a ported 2-way which has also a similar clean waterfall in the mids like the NS-10:
View attachment 164528
Well, another vote for mixes done on the Amphion One15s over the Neumann KH120s.Could I hear them? I'm a musician and mix engineer myself. I always had trouble getting things to translate right on the 120's, I wonder if I'll hear the same things here. Transients were damn near impossible to gauge for me.
I didn't find the transient response that bad but definitely nowhere near the Amphions which are fast as hell.Well, another vote for mixes done on the Amphion One15s over the Neumann KH120s.
It's worth a golden audiophile to read so much fancy.What did surprise me though was how bad the transient response on the PSIs was. They are quiet intentionally a very "warm" sounding speaker, better for enjoying music rather than working on, like a Bose.
I wonder how you actually gain any knowledge with your condescending attitude other than reflecting on your voice.It's worth a golden audiophile to read so much fancy.
The transient or the lochness audio.
All speakers convey the same transient information? Wow that’s amazing. Lol.It's worth a golden audiophile to read so much fancy.
The transient or the lochness audio.