Pearljam5000
Master Contributor
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2020
- Messages
- 7,485
- Likes
- 9,260
- Thread Starter
- #7,781
At least the midrange directivity is good so it's mildly EQ-able.
I found this, but can’t read or translate Czech, so not sure exactly how the measurement was made.I am afraid this is not the case here, as there are some very narrow dips and signs of cancellation/lobing effects, particularly in the transitional band midrange>tweeter.
Was surprised myself to see this, but I have seen several frequency response graphs on hifinews which did not match what I knew, or had measured. Please note that their graphs are pretty stretched vertically. Example:
View attachment 502107
Reference 3kCanton Reference 3 measurements
I commented on a different graph though.I am afraid this is not the case here, as there are some very narrow dips and signs of cancellation/lobing effects, particularly in the transitional band midrange>tweeter.
Was surprised myself to see this, but I have seen several frequency response graphs on hifinews which did not match what I knew, or had measured. Please note that their graphs are pretty stretched vertically. Example:
View attachment 502107
Yes, but I am too lazy to search for all published measurements of Canton loudspeakers. You have to trust my 4 decades long obsession about loudspeakers - older Canton models measure pretty flat, new models have slightly "happy face" frequency response.One good measurement doesn't really reassert your original claim as much as one bad measurement spoils it.
Speaking in code?They look very professional.
Those want to stand in a corner, not?
YG has sent quite some of their models in the past to Stereophile where they showed nice on-axis linearity and smooth directivity (thanks to their waveguide), exemplary:
YG Acoustics Carmel 2 loudspeaker Measurements | Stereophile.com
Sidebar 3: Measurements I used DRA Labs' MLSSA system and a calibrated DPA 4006 microphone to measure the YG Acoustics Carmel 2's frequency response in the farfield, and an Earthworks QTC-40 for the nearfield and spatially averaged room responses.www.stereophile.com
YG Acoustics Sonja 1.3 loudspeaker Measurements | Stereophile.com
Sidebar 3: Measurements Because of the YGA Sonja 1.3's bulk and mass, I performed the farfield measurements, using DRA Labs' MLSSA system and a calibrated DPA 4006 microphone, only on the Sonja 1.1 module. For the nearfield and spatially averaged room responses of all three modules, I used an...www.stereophile.com
YG Acoustics Anat Reference II Professional loudspeaker Measurements | Stereophile.com
Sidebar 3: Measurements I measured the YG Acoustics Anat Reference II Professional's behavior mainly using DRA Labs' MLSSA system with a calibrated DPA microphone and an Earthworks Zero Distortion preamplifier. Because of the bulk and mass of the two woofer sections, I could perform a complete...www.stereophile.com
I would guess they expect rather Stereophile readers to buy loudspeakers in that price range than EAC or ASR ones, at least I would do in their position (or even better to both of course).