Pearljam5000
Master Contributor
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2020
- Messages
- 8,237
- Likes
- 11,023
- Thread Starter
- #6,521
At least the crossover is very complex lol
If you were wealthy, you won't, for you'd know the value of earning money.They may be overpriced but that alone doesn't count and if I was super-wealthy I'd pay it
Oh I know that, don't worry.If you were wealthy, you won't, for you'd know the value of earning money.![]()
Really?If you were wealthy, you won't, for you'd know the value of earning money.![]()
Absolutely!There's no point having money if you're not going to spend it.
Spending £50 on a fuse is snake oil.Absolutely!
But for snake-oil.![]()
Just imagine $850,000 over 30 years, which amounts to $28,333.33 per year, or $2,361.11 per month.Really?
And they have been and I consider them to have been a good buy for me, almost 30 years later.
I was not rich enough to spend that much but better off than many.Just imagine $850,000 over 30 years, which amounts to $28,333.33 per year, or $2,361.11 per month.
Your wife would be quite pleased as well!
Just have a search how many pairs of speakers you can buy for $2,361.11, that will last 30 years, or even for just 10 years.I was not rich enough to spend that much but better off than many.
My wife doesn't care about money at all, which is a good quality in a wife.
Your understanding of the meaning of snake oil differs from mine, and US dollars are not a currency I ever need to useJust have a search how many pairs of speakers you can buy for $2,361.11, that will last 30 years, or even for just 10 years.
Or even for less than $1000...
Rest is just snake-oil.
It's all relative. My last set of speakers cost me 10 week's wages. No problem spending that, it's my money, the wife would not have a say in it (if I had a wife).Just imagine $850,000 over 30 years, which amounts to $28,333.33 per year, or $2,361.11 per month.
Your wife would be quite pleased as well!
I grok that.Your understanding of the meaning of snake oil differs from mine,
This suggests that your hearing has deteriorated... the set of speakers costing ten weeks' wages won't restore that. What we hear is often what we imagine we are hearing, as our ears are not microphones, what we hear cannot be represented on a graph, , except by an ear doctor.I'm now retired
Get 8381Really?
When I was earning a good salary I bought a pair of speakers that cost the same as a Porsche 911 and still listen to them every day. It WAS an extravagance that I considered at great length but I considered that for the number of hours a day I use them and how long they would last they were much, much better value than a car.
And they have been and I consider them to have been a good buy for me, almost 30 years later.
I have considered changing them from time to time but either too ugly (Genelec 8361 with W371) or not suited to my listening environment (D&D 8C, ideally needs to be near a wall).
I know the value of money, every penny I have I earned myself.
I have considered it but I'm too old to appreciate them long enoughGet 8381
Then you're done for life![]()
Nonsense.I grok that.
This suggests that your hearing has deteriorated... the set of speakers costing ten weeks' wages won't restore that. What we hear is often what we imagine we are hearing, as our ears are not microphones, what we hear cannot be represented on a graph, , except by an ear doctor.
I grok that.
This suggests that your hearing has deteriorated... the set of speakers costing ten weeks' wages won't restore that. What we hear is often what we imagine we are hearing, as our ears are not microphones, what we hear cannot be represented on a graph, , except by an ear doctor.

No doubt it has deteriorated since I was 20, but I'm 'only' 56.I grok that.
This suggests that your hearing has deteriorated... the set of speakers costing ten weeks' wages won't restore that. What we hear is often what we imagine we are hearing, as our ears are not microphones, what we hear cannot be represented on a graph.
Sadly 99.99% of everything I have seen by this member can be thus described.Nonsense.
Keith
Variations do influence the wave propagation, but in a very small way. https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...imulation-analysis-screws-in-waveguide.22985/I do not think a brushing or rough surface from casting will influence the effectiveness or performance of the waveguide. Such unevenness is way below 0.2mm, and the smallest wavelength to be reproduced is 17mm. A lot of waveguides have an uneven surface, may it result from lacquering or casting.