Most beautiful speakers in the world ?

[Audionaut]

Then you need to listen to the I'm sure it can handle any volume

Probably not, because the cone area in the treble range is too small for extreme levels.
In addition, it is only a dome tweeter and not a compression driver with a horn.

 

[Pearljam5000]

Probably not, because the cone area in the treble range is too small for extreme levels.
In addition, it is only a dome tweeter and not a compression driver with a horn.

 

[Audionaut]

The material does not change the diaphragm area or the transducer principle.

 

[Pearljam5000]

Probably not, because the cone area in the treble range is too small for extreme levels.
In addition, it is only a dome tweeter and not a compression driver with a horn.

Then why would he use a tweeter that is not the right one for the task?

 

[Audionaut]

Then why would he use a tweeter that is not the right one for the task?

What is the task?
The tweeter will probably be sufficient for the purpose intended by the developer.

But you wrote that this speaker can reproduce any volume.
And for that task PA Chassis and high-frequency compression drivers are usually used.
They can produce much higher volumes.

 

[Pearljam5000]

Hercules studio monitors

 

[Lekha]

Such a tiny thing, with just a 35mm diaphragm, yet it produces quite a room-filling sound, and even a bit of bass. Observing all those Ikea Blanda Matt bowl speakers, one can understand why DIY enthusiasts opt for bowls and tubes. Even Linkwitz opted for tubes.

 

[Pearljam5000]

 

[Count Arthur]

View attachment 450732View attachment 450733View attachment 450734View attachment 450735View attachment 450736

Nope.

 

[Pearljam5000]

 

[Pearljam5000]

 

[boxerfan88]

What's causing the recent (posting) trend of eyeball looking speakers?

 

[Pearljam5000]

What's causing the recent (posting) trend of eyeball looking speakers?

Lol
A coincidence

 

[Pearljam5000]

 

[OldHvyMec]

What a mess to keep clean with wires routed and noise-free. I bet it's a horrible hiss factory. Look at the mess just in that picture. That would drive me nuts. NO THANKS.

I don't need any help with being nuts; that would drive me straight over the edge. How would a person clean that? YOU WOULDN'T.

Regards

 

[norman bates]

I like the horn loaded domes in post #6,310 (above).

Not keen on distance tweet to woof, but in the salad bowl would be diffraction free (mostly).

 

[Arindal]

View attachment 450741

One of the very few speakers exhibiting their drivers and ports I would call beautiful. Do you know which coaxial design is used here?

the salad bowl would be diffraction free (mostly).

You mean free from edge diffraction? Certainly true, but not necessary with most of bigger waveguides/horns and not always an advantage in terms of dispersion properties with conventional tweeters.

 

[Pearljam5000]

One of the very few speakers exhibiting their drivers and ports I would call beautiful. Do you know which coaxial design is used here?



You mean free from edge diffraction? Certainly true, but not necessary an advantage in terms of dispersion properties.

 

[Arindal]

@Pearljam5000 thanks for sharing.

seemingly this one, or a derivative thereof:

Tang Band 8" coaxial

Very promising coaxial design. Would love to hear one of these.

 

[Palmer]

@Pearljam5000 thanks for sharing.

seemingly this one, or a derivative thereof:

Tang Band 8" coaxial

Very promising coaxial design. Would love to hear one of these.

W8-2314 - 8” Paper Coaxial Full Range - TB SPEAKER CO., LTD.

www.tb-speaker.com