Most beautiful speakers in the world ?

[Salt]

Is it so hard?
You want to know what they are called? Do a bit work. The time you used to write that text took you longer than to do this search.

It is a 1 click for me to do so for more than only one image search ... but You don't understand that this is not a 'photo presentation shop' but a technical forum that demands some facts, at least who&what. Is it so hard to understand?
(Besides: whining may be on your side, I'm perfectly fine ... but beware of starting this stuff of personal offence like in other Foren ...)
: SO WHAT BRAND AND MODEL?

 

[Bleib]

It is a 1 click for me to do so for more than only one image search ... but You don't understand that this is not a 'photo presentation shop' but a technical forum that demands some facts, at least who&what. Is it so hard to understand?
(Besides: whining may be on your side, I'm perfectly fine ... but beware of starting this stuff of personal offence like in other Foren ...)
: SO WHAT BRAND AND MODEL?

"SO WHAT BRAND AND MODEL?"
So no whining? Not even when there is yelling?
Let me guess, you didn't even click on the link did you?
You're gonna go technical in a topic devoted to pictures? As it's been said before, this is about the supposed most beautiful speakers topic, it doesn't really dig into the technical side. You can try as much as you want reading specs as well, but it won't give you a hint on any of these sound unless you actually get the hear them.
This is the same with the most ugly components topic. Some topics are actually devoted to the visual part of the stuff. Stuff most of us will never ever hear.
And it's the same thing as with anything, if something interests you then YOU can go dig deeper. Try it.

 

[Salt]

"SO WHAT BRAND AND MODEL?"
So no whining? Not even when there is yelling?
Let me guess, you didn't even click on the link did you?
You're gonna go technical in a topic devoted to pictures? As it's been said before, this is about the supposed most beautiful speakers topic, it doesn't really dig into the technical side. You can try as much as you want reading specs as well, but it won't give you a hint on any of these sound unless you actually get the hear them.
This is the same with the most ugly components topic. Some topics are actually devoted to the visual part of the stuff. Stuff most of us will never ever hear.
And it's the same thing as with anything, if something interests you then YOU can go dig deeper. Try it.

 

[Bleib]

More useless nonsense. You could at least post a picture or two on your own. But nope. Some are just whining machines, contribute very little on their own.
SO WHERE IS YOUR PICTURES. PLEASE POST ALL DATA, MANUFACTURING YEAR, GRAPHS IF YOU CAN FIND, IF YOU HAVE EXPERIENCE WITH THEM, HOW DO THEY COMPARE TO OTHER STUFF YOU HAVE HEARD, WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THEM?

Just, lazy, lazy whining. Even on a Sunday.

 

[Salt]

Manufacturer and model.
Nothing more at request.

 

[Bleib]

Manufacturer and model.
Nothing more at request.

You do it.
I'm not your servant.
Over 99% of the stuff that you look at here you will forget and have zero actual interaction with.

 

[ryanosaur]

I was gonna say 15.

But really acting 9.

Grow the f up, please, and stop polluting the ether.

 

[boxerfan88]

 

[cavedriver]

View attachment 445197

If I'm not mistaken that is a cutaway of the Sonus Faber Stradivari G2, a fairly nice looking speaker, although I wish they would tone down the red in that varnish.

 

[Pearljam5000]

 

[Alexander Gödde]

Again, more whining and little action on your own

10 seconds with google. [...]

Is it so hard?
You want to know what they are called? Do a bit work. The time you used to write that text took you longer than to do this search.

When you post you can make the 10 seconds of effort once, and everybody else on this forum who is interested in the make and model then doesn't need to.

 

[Lekha]

 

[Tovarich007]

Again, more whining and little action on your own

10 seconds with google. Here's a how to. Copy the image link. Go into google images, paste it in and search:

- Sök på Google

Is it so hard?
You want to know what they are called? Do a bit work. The time you used to write that text took you longer than to do this search.

Not difficult, so why don't you do it yourself and publish manufaturer's name and model under (or above) the picture you post.
Simple rule, no ?

 

[Frank Dernie]

Again, more whining and little action on your own

10 seconds with google. Here's a how to. Copy the image link. Go into google images, paste it in and search:

- Sök på Google

Is it so hard?
You want to know what they are called? Do a bit work. The time you used to write that text took you longer than to do this search.

Personally I avoid Google, so your suggestion is useless in my case, otoh I don't care what they are usually.

 

[Lekha]

Different types of LXMinis.

 

[EERecordist]

Searched, did not find these yet.

Lenard Audio in Australia makes some imposing speakers. It looks like Dayton and others have stolen his Opal name.

Professional Systems

Mastering

Cinema

Home

 

[JohnnyAudio]

Searched, did not find these yet.

Lenard Audio in Australia makes some imposing speakers. It looks like Dayton and others have stolen his Opal name.

Professional Systems

Mastering

View attachment 446057

Cinema

View attachment 446058

Home

View attachment 446059

Wow nice with tube towers!

 

[EERecordist]

Elysio Hornspeaker https://elysio.eu/ https://elysio.eu/pricelist

Western Electric 16A design with added concentric tweeter.

 

[cavedriver]

Often n/a
If it's important for you, then do a reverse image search

it occurs to me there's a good reason people should put brands and models in their posts. This thread is 300 pages - there is no way to search within the thread for an image afaik, but it's easy to search for a speaker name, which should help us to avoid repeatedly posting the same speakers over and over. A little thing but helpful.

 

[Pearljam5000]

Kanto Uki