They play in different leagues, so to speak.The M-5000 is priced by weight - it's 60 lbs (27 kilos). Add another pound when it's turned on for all the charged electrons stored in the ginormous soda can capacitors.
View attachment 546142
They play in different leagues, so to speak.The M-5000 is priced by weight - it's 60 lbs (27 kilos). Add another pound when it's turned on for all the charged electrons stored in the ginormous soda can capacitors.
View attachment 546142
Speaking of tube amplifiers, I like the look of this classic:View attachment 546143
Weston Acoustics
Peach Trees from the Dredd movie lolAnother Peachtree model that is currently sold
View attachment 546249
View attachment 546250
Remote is a bit ugly though
View attachment 546251
I’m not exactly a hardcore tube dude, but since I brought up one tube classic, I can—or rather, I’ll let Erin do it—highlight another classic, McIntosh MC275:Speaking of tube amplifiers, I like the look of this classic:
View attachment 546144
![]()
TAS Legacy: Harman Kardon Citation II Power Amplifier
The Citation II was Stu Hegeman’s penultimate masterpiece, inspired by his unwavering desire to build a power amplifier equal to his stunningly greatwww.theabsolutesound.com

I’m not exactly a hardcore tube dude, but since I brought up one tube classic, I can—or rather, I’ll let Erin do it—highlight another classic, McIntosh MC275:
Regardning the fake, or clone Orsefon 275 tube amp, I wrote this in the comments section of Erin’s video:
View attachment 549639
Erin measures frequency response and distortion. It probably comes as no surprise that the McIntosh MC275 is the better one. Although, compared to modern solid-state amps, it’s pretty lousy in terms of distortion (though I’ll leave that aside).
After all, the subject of this thread is the look—the aesthetic appeal. By the way, having said that, that Orsefon 275 (McIntosh MC275 clone) looks grotesque.It looks cheap, vulgar, fake-gold, and so on.![]()
I’ve heard people say that, sure, but that Orsefon 275 tube amp has more than twice the distortion in the higher frequencies, at 5 watt, compared to my budget Micca MB42X G2 spare/bedroom speakers. To me, that turns the distortion hierarchy of the audio chain completely upside down.But, but, it's supposed to provide you with that warm 2nd order harmonics fuzzy goodness....![]()
www.audiosciencereview.com
The unit as such looks quite nice. But that logo – no! Just like »Look, honey! From my first term at art college! 1977!«Here is a new one, I think it's a strange form factor for an amplifier. Not sure it blends seamlessly into your home as they claim, but at least it's different.And actually Norwegian (Aura Fidelity).
View attachment 549902
Modern,new, solid state. Class AB or class D. In terms of performance—yes. Price—oh, definitely. BUT, aesthetically pleasing? I don't think so. Most of them have a "hide-it-in-the-closet" look.My takeaway from the clone McIntosh review.
You can buy a genuine solid state amplifier, for a fraction of the cost of either of them, that will comfortably outperform both of them.![]()
Modern,new, solid state. Class AB or class D. In terms of performance—yes. Price—oh, definitely. BUT, aesthetically pleasing? I don't think so. Most of them have a "hide-it-in-the-closet" look.
Regarding tube amplifiers: I’ve said this before—I think that’s something for electronics-savvy DIY enthusiasts to get into. I fully understand that.But for others who don’t fall into that category? Nope.
As y'all already know -- I prefer more of a Darwinian natural selection vibe.Not everyone likes the "bunch of bulbs with some chicken wire" look of valve amps.![]()


So that's what the monoliths were; amplifiers from the future:Here is a new one, I think it's a strange form factor for an amplifier. Not sure it blends seamlessly into your home as they claim, but at least it's different.And actually Norwegian (Aura Fidelity).
View attachment 549902