If it made the sound quality higher then it achieves its goal. Improving music is something for the subjective domain.Even if it made the sound higher quality, would it improve the music?
The "Even if" part of your text is self-explanatory.Even if it made the sound higher quality, would it improve the music?
It's the new "leet" speaking... that reads Krono.So -- how does one pronounce QRONO? Is that two syllables -- the first being... umm... "Q"?
![]()
ESS Technology is probably the first semiconductor company to offer an ADC with FOQUS: Link"Expect to see FOQUZ in leading professional studio gear..." No thanks, I don't think I will expect to see that.![]()
“According to Jbara, "Engineers can now convey an analog sense of timing and space without the need to record at 192kHz or DXD sampling rates."MQA news from Munich: Link
The key thing is will and ADC with FOQUS solve any existing problems and generate a sufficient rate of return on the purchase? Nothing to do with audiophiles, this is question for professionals and their accountants.ESS Technology is probably the first semiconductor company to offer an ADC with FOQUS: Link
Remember:
FOQUS comes to market in partnership with semiconductor companies who specialise in audio chips.
Sorry Pogo but using the same people who failed to impress anybody with their support of MQA aren’t going to impress the people Lenbrook need to impress.The new plug-ins seem to be well received in the studio sector: Link
FOQUS? Eh, Foq this.ESS Technology is probably the first semiconductor company to offer an ADC with FOQUS: Link
Remember:
FOQUS comes to market in partnership with semiconductor companies who specialise in audio chips.
So, it looks like the whole thing is using a DAC filter that doesn't have any pre-ringing.The Whitepaper provides a rough overview of how the new plug-ins work: Link
The new plug-ins seem to be well received in the studio sector: Link
This account is maintained by the Magnetic Magazine editorial staff. It is used for curated roundups, press release-based content, affiliate posts, and other short-form articles developed internally by the team. It exists to streamline content that doesn’t require individual attribution, while maintaining consistency and editorial oversight across the site.
There are may points I'd like to underline / enbold, but... the 7-years-ago thing of Archimago still stands out proud.FOQUS? Eh, Foq this.
So, it looks like the whole thing is using a DAC filter that doesn't have any pre-ringing.
But I thought we found out (kicking and screaming in some cases) that pre-ringing is not as bad as it looks from listening to MP3s? And it looks like Archimago debunked this 7 years ago.
What's old is new again, I guess. It's a little sad that they're basically just rehashing the same crap Meridian was apparently doing back in 2009.
I would have to dispute the idea that this article constitutes acceptance or approval in the industry. It's just a reposted press release.
From the footer:
Translated: This is an ad, and you should take note of the fact that no actual writers put their name on it.
I think history is being rewritten right now.
Archimago has probably not done itself any favors by judging new technologies this year without understanding how they work.
I think history is being rewritten right now.
Archimago has probably not done itself any favors by judging new technologies this year without understanding how they work.