renaudrenaud
Major Contributor
Packaging is so important to you?Add loli-free packaging option and color me interested!
Packaging is so important to you?Add loli-free packaging option and color me interested!
I don't have the DX5 but I have a SMSL C200, with a bit less power than the DX5.Would my Topping DX5 (set on High Gain) be able to drive these at a reasonable level? I understand that the DX5 is current limited at 50 Ohm and lower.
If I would like to get optimal performance on these headphones (at a reasonable cost) would it be worth it to buy a Topping A90 or would a cheaper Topping device also suffice? I am assuming the DAC in the DX5 is pretty good and I won't need to upgrade my DAC also.
I got this last week as well. It doesn't have a lot of energy in the bas region but has some extra in treble. Quite comfy and good for gaming I suppose but it's not exactly made for professsional monitoringThe new closed-back DD JOKER, on the other hand, seems to have got everything right. Fits me perfectly (even though it looks suspiciously similar to the VOID) and sounds great, and at less than half the price of the VOID.
This sounds amazing...
I can understand why Moondrop (MOONDROP) chose to abbrieviate PARADISE to PARA, and COSMOPOLITAN to COSMO, to match the Chinese naming, but I wish Moondrop/MOONDROP would go easy on the all-caps.The Para (not Paradise) is a very good option for folks wanting that oh so illusive “planar HD600”. It’s certainly a lot cheaper than the MM-500.
I loved the sound quality, but I am getting tired of headphones that clock in at over 500 grams. Same reason I didn’t jive with the Audeze.
The question is; do you feel the added subbass makes up for the downgrade in comfort? I didn’t.
Btw a good headphone amp is advised. The sensitivity is in V not dB/mW.