• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Moondrop Para 2 Planar Headphone Review

Rate this headphone:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 5 2.5%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 17 8.6%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 89 45.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 86 43.7%

  • Total voters
    197

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
48,837
Likes
286,207
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review, listening test, EQ and detailed measurements of the Moondrop Para 2 planar magnetic headphone. It was kindly drop shipped by a member and costs US $500.
Moondrop Para 2 Full-size Planar Headphone review.jpg

I can't say this is an attractive design but it is not ugly either. I wish they had deburred the edges of the headband mount as it has a rough feel. Otherwise, its low weight combined with low clamp pressure, makes the Para 2 very comfortable to wear. Thoughtful cabling is provided in the form of flat and lightweight wire terminating in 4.4 mm connector. A nice adapter cable is then provided to go from that to 3.5mm if needed.

It was a pleasure to read the company webpage for it as it is full of detailed engineering explanation including FEA optimization and measurements. Let's see if we can confirm them.

Moondrop Para 2 Headphone Measurements
As usual, we start with our headphone frequency response measurement and comparison to our target:
Moondrop Para 2 Full-size Planar Headphone Frequency Response Measurement.png

As noted, fitment on the GRAS 45CA was easy as if the headphone is made for it. The response lacks bass boost and some variations from 500 Hz on:
Moondrop Para 2 Full-size Planar Headphone target relative Frequency Response Measurement.png


The measurement matches company documentation although they show a peak 3+ kHz and another around 9 kHz:
Moondrop Para 2 Full-size Planar Headphone company frequency response.png

They would be better off adopting our target as it is a much closer match to the headphone response. :)

I was stunned at the low harmonic distortion:
Moondrop Para 2 Full-size Planar Headphone relative THD distortion Measurement.png


Even at 114 dBSPL it doesn't blink. This mean we can EQ the bass without fear.

Absolute level distortion shows signs of optimization and matches company measurements:
Moondrop Para 2 Full-size Planar Headphone THD distortion Measurement.png


Group delay is very messy though, likely due to internal reflections:
Moondrop Para 2 Full-size Planar Headphone Group Delay Response Measurement.png


Impedance is flat (good) but is also extremely low:
Moondrop Para 2 Full-size Planar Headphone Impedance Measurement.png


Sensitivity is a bit less than average:
Best planar headphone review 2025.png


Comfortable listening level is -37 dB on my Topping DX5II so you don't need a lot of power to drive it.

Moondrop Para 2 Listening Test and EQ
I switched from my everyday headphone to Para 2 in the middle of a track I was listening to. Even though it was not at all a bass heavy track, I immediately noticed loss of bass. Otherwise, the sound was pleasant and you could certainly use the headphone. But put some salt and pepper in there in the form of a few filters and you experience some of the best i have heard in headphone and possibly speaker:
Moondrop Para 2 Full-size Planar Headphone Equalization EQ Measurement.png


The bass came alive like nobody's business. Not only was it there, it was there is such clean character that made me notice time and time again. Spatial qualities are excellent which translated to every note taking its space around an oval outside of my ear. The clarity is unbelievable. Shutting off all the filters left me with sound that was good, but lost everything impressive about the headphone with EQ.

As soon as I took the review picture, I wore them again just to experience the superb sound one can get out of this combination.

Conclusions
If Moondrop had not chosen a flat bass response, the Para 2 could have come close to some of the best headphones I have tested or heard. Fortunately with just a few filters, you wake up this headphone to produce some of the best sound you can experience. Combine it with its comfort and you have an incredible combination. I guess science and engineering works. :)

I am going to recommend the Moondrop Para 2. If you don't use EQ with it though, i will personally come to your home and take it away from you! You deserve to hear what high fidelity is about once you combine Para 2 with EQ.

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Specification​

Model: PARA 2 Full-size Planar Headphone

Impedance: 9Ω ± 15% (@1kHz)

Sensitivity: 106dB / Vrms (@1kHz)

THD: THD≤0.03% (@1kHz, 94dB)

Frequency Response: 20Hz-42kHz (IEC61094, Free Field)

Effective Frequency Response: 20Hz-20kz (IEC60318-4, -3dB)

Earphone Jack: Dual 3.5mm

Cable Plug: 4.4mm Balanced Plug
 
Loose thought regarding "internal reflections" - maybe a metal housing is not the best idea?
 
:D Thank you for the review of this impressive headphone. Is it possible to do distortion measurements with the ParEQ activated?
It is possible but the process is annoying. :) You can get an idea from the graphs I presented. If you listen at 94 dB and boost bass by 10 dB, then it will be like the 104 dB. That response was still incredibly good so I don't expect any issues.
 
Nice industrial design, now if they release PARA3 with less need for EQ I might try it out
 
Last edited:
Is the 10k anomaly audible/does it affect the entire sound range? Excellent review and excellent product, definitely a must-have if you can afford it...
 
Hi,

I got the Para 1 and then went to the Venus.
Probably one of the best headphones I've heard.

BUT I do not listen to the Venus anymore and I will not buy anythiing from Moondrop anymore.
Why ?
Simply put the headphone is much too fragile.
It dropped ONCE on the floor from about 1.2m height.
Result was a broken grill that pierced the foil that vibrates to provide sound. So one side not working anymore...

I've been in touch with Moondrop, was able to provide proof of purchase as a brand new item.
I asked if they could provide a new "earcuff" for the Venus (even without the earpad that I still have).
Reply (after several days) was : "Send the whole headphone back to China. We wxill repair it and charge for the repair and tell you the amount to pay once it's repaired".

So : fragile device + super bad customer service = no more Moondrop for me.
I'll stick to the headphone I still have... some of them also fell without any damage.
Maybe it is bad luck for the device. But I think the customer support is representative of some brands... Despite wanting to look cool, Moondrop is not :-(

That is to explain why I voted poor on a probably superb product...
I'll wait for the Fiio 7 and hoipe this will get measured also :)
 
Last edited:
Voted poor.
Parametric equalization does not come in the pack.

And I find it unacceptable for a product to be rated 'excellent' when it is fundamentally deficient and requires external, complex adjustments (like PEQ) to perform well. It's akin to calling a speaker 'excellent' and then immediately saying: '...but you must sit 30cm away, as the built-in amps are too weak.' The dependence on user correction makes the rating misleading.

See the exactly opposite scenario was already done:
"All was not well. You may be wondering with measurements as good as posted, why the 8341 did not get the top honor panther and had to settle for the next grade down. I was quite surprised that as I turned up the volume, listening at just 1 meter or so from the speaker, it just would not get that loud. At first I heard a glitching/ticking sound which then moved into red LED coming up with much more distortion. The amplification is simply too low for the amount of bass this speaker produces."

seen here: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/genelec-8341a-sam™-studio-monitor-review.11652/

That Genelec was not good enough...

So ? Sit closer, perhaps 60 cm, and grant top honor panther.

I argue that a product should not be considered "excellent" if it cannot deliver excellent performance without relying on user-provided fixes, regardless of whether that fix is digital or physical.

And that brings us to the deeper issue: the EXCELLENCE label was meant. so I thought, to represent technical excellence. But if it’s applied to products that only shine after user intervention, it risks becoming a commercial label instead—a marketing tool rather than a rigorous standard.
 
Last edited:
reserved

@amirm the EQ you devised is not visible in the screenshot...


Here are some thoughts about the EQ.
Please report your findings, positive or negative!

Notes about the EQ design:
  • The average L/R is used to calculate the score.
  • The resolution is 12 points per octave interpolated from the raw data (provided by @amirm)
  • A Genetic Algorithm is used to optimize the EQ.
  • The EQ Score is designed to MAXIMIZE the Score WHILE fitting the Harman target curve (and other constraints) with a fixed complexity.
    This will avoid weird results if one only optimizes for the Score, start your journey here or there.
    There is a presentation by S. Olive here.
    It will probably flatten the Error regression doing so, the tonal balance should be therefore more neutral.
  • The EQs are starting point and may require tuning (certainly at LF and maybe at HF).
  • The range around and above 10kHz is usually not EQed unless smooth enough to do so.
  • I am using PEQ (PK) as from my experience the definition is more consistent across different DSP/platform implementations than shelves.
  • With some HP/amp combo, the boosts and preamp gain (loss of Dynamic range) need to be carefully considered to avoid issues with, amongst other things, too low a Max SPL or damaging your device. You have beed warned.
  • Not all units of the same product are made equal. The EQ is based on the measurements of a single unit. YMMV with regard to the very unit you are trying this EQ on.
  • I sometimes use variations of the Harman curve for some reasons. See rational here and here
  • NOTE: the score then calculated is not comparable to the scores derived from the default Harman target curve if not otherwise noted.

Good L/R match.

I have generated one EQ, the APO config file is attached.

Score no EQ: 69.2
Score with EQ: 70.4

The score is limited by the trough at ~9/10 kHz

Moondropo Para 2 EQ Flat 96000Hz.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Voted poor.
Parametric equalization does not come in the pack.

And I find it unacceptable for a product to be rated 'excellent' when it is fundamentally deficient and requires external, complex adjustments (like PEQ) to perform well. It's akin to calling a speaker 'excellent' and then immediately saying: '...but you must sit 30cm away, as the built-in amps are too weak.' The dependence on user correction makes the rating misleading.
The main issue with claims that EQ transforms an ok sounding headphone into a superb one - it is likely not to work as well for another Para II that the end user has. At least 3 units should be measured to see if they all measure the same and can benefit that much from the same EQ profile before giving such a strong recommendation/rating.
 
The main issue with claims that EQ transforms an ok sounding headphone into a superb one - it is likely not to work as well for another Para II that the end user has. At least 3 units should be measured to see if they all measure the same and can benefit that much from the same EQ profile before giving such a strong recommendation/rating.
When are you ordering 3 pairs and a measuring rig?
 
I am going to recommend the Moondrop Para 2. If you don't use EQ with it though, i will personally come to your home and take it away from you! You deserve to hear what high fidelity is about once you combine Para 2 with EQ.
Thank you Amir. If I get this headphone I will make sure I apply EQ. But no matter what, you are always welcome to my home, for good food, a drink, or just tea.
 
Thank you for the review. The flat bass is somewhat inherent to the closed front volume, open back volume planar design. They would have to use something like a resistor like DCA headphones did. The trade off is generally using a driver with a lower resonance frequency so they are more tolerant of seal breakage, allowing for low bass with no roll off for most users. Practically speaking, it is probably easier to find a way to boost the bass than it is to do a full EQ for the sound changes of a broken seal of a headphone that uses a different design.

I tend to go for headphones with this design as getting a good seal is near impossible on my head.
 
Back
Top Bottom