Crinnacle has published measurements for Moondrop Void (the dynamic ones): https://crinacle.com/graphs/headphones/graphtool/?share=Harman_AE_OE_2018_Target,Void
Bass look similar to the HD6XX/HD650 but the Moondrop has more ear-gain compensation.Crinnacle has published measurements for Moondrop Void (the dynamic ones): https://crinacle.com/graphs/headphones/graphtool/?share=Harman_AE_OE_2018_Target,Void
It's interesting to tell you that the designer of those products at Topping interned at Moondrop in 2018. And it was he who showed Moondrop the importance of target curves.Moon Drop has done extremely well with Chifi IEMs. I hope they do to the headphone market what Topping has done on the DAC/AMP side. Crush the price and deliver high-quality headphones that measure great. I would love to see a comfortable, serviceable, headphone that lets me EQ either diffuse-field or Harman and lets me use a balanced cable for the extra powr.
Yes, a little warmer and bass heavier than the venerable HD650. Not a bad reference at all.Bass look similar to the HD6XX/HD650 but the Moondrop has more ear-gain compensation.
Align at 425Hz like Amir does. Gives a better view.Yes, a little warmer and bass heavier than the venerable HD650. Not a bad reference at all.
Crinacle's Headphone Graph Tool | Hangout.Audio
Compare industry-standard GRAS 43AG-7 headphone graphs, measured by Crinacle.crinacle.com
View attachment 225387
Good tip. Aligned at 380Hz and bass is almost identical, Void only warmer.Align at 425Hz like Amir does. Gives a better view.
No wonder they share the same approach to atrocious QC..It's interesting to tell you that the designer of those products at Topping interned at Moondrop in 2018. And it was he who showed Moondrop the importance of target curves.
You are right. I was switching the graphs around. The Sennheiser is tuned "brighter". Hmmm, makes me fear the Moondrop can sound dull and muffled.
The QC on Moondrop products is great. I have several of their products and have had not one QC problemen with any of them.No wonder they share the same approach to atrocious QC..
and we all know who the topping designer isIt's interesting to tell you that the designer of those products at Topping interned at Moondrop in 2018. And it was he who showed Moondrop the importance of target curves.
You don't hang around much on the Internet, do you?The QC on Moondrop products is great. I have several of their products and have had not one QC problemen with any of them.
Just to point out that if YOU have an issue with ONE of their products, it is not that the QC of the whole brand is bad.
Same argument applies to your statement. If you have couple products and do not have problem, that doesn't mean the company or products do not have QC issue.The QC on Moondrop products is great. I have several of their products and have had not one QC problemen with any of them.
Just to point out that if YOU have an issue with ONE of their products, it is not that the QC of the whole brand is bad.
Yeah, so ok, a very similar, but a bit darker version of the HD650, for a lower price, but apparently much more plasticky look and feel. There might be a market for that, but no need to get one if you already have any of the HD 650/600/6XX line or similar. I am now a bit underwhelmed.
Oh well, *puts on Edition XS*I had the same issue with the Sundara and HE400SE. It's been an issue in general for me and my dumbo ears
I feel like headphone manufacturers should at least be targeting 65mm+ given the standards and all
Oh well, *puts on HD800*
Well, then let them buy these crafts themselves ...their bosses and engineers do not like low frequency