I’ll preface this by saying I haven’t had a chance to listen to the c208 or the Arendals at this point, just been doing a lot of reading.My own evaluation of the incorrect/sneaky polars is semi-important, but I sense great dishonesty with them saying they don't even have the horizontal polars. Real respect for customers (savvy or not) right there.
Big centers...somehow Revel C208's keep selling. I did mention they could tighten up the toppled MTM making the center somewhat taller and at least address some of the lobing issues...no new drivers/3-way needed.
How do you like the 1961 monitor trio? I have been thinking about that in an AT screen setup. Alas I worry about projector fan noise in high altitude fan mode (I am at 7000 ft), especially when my rrom's noise floor is already a low 26dBA (therefore thinking about direct display too).
In trying to decide between a c208/f208 or f206 vs Arendal 1723 THX monitors as my next LCRs, the 3-way setup of the c208 vs the dynamic range benefits of the Arendal seem to be the big trade-offs. I would be using dual Monolith 15’ subs, hence why I’d probably be skipping the Arendal towers and just go with the monitors.
I might be reading into it wrong, but Arendal seems to claim their speakers have better dynamic range than a lot of the 3-way setups out there because of their dedicated 8 inch mids. Even the c208 uses a very small mid driver (around 4 inches I believe?). I currently have a 3-way center (the SVS Ultra Center) and don’t like the idea of switching to a MTM design, but part of me does wonder how big of a deal it is given that anyone that really cares is usually pretty well within the sweet spot of the combined LCRs (in my case, my L and R towers are towed in pretty aggressively, which gives me even more reason to do this).
Not saying when the time comes that I won’t go with the c208 (I’m sure it would be a huge upgrade), but I’m not going to lie that having a completely matched front stage minus the horizontal Arendal 1721 center (that is really the same as the monitors) isn’t super appealing. I am using a normal TV in my setup, so a transparent screen with 3 horizontal monitors or towers isn’t an option. I thought about doing matching R3 or m106 bookshelves, but I’d have to raise my TV more than I would like. I am also afraid they wouldn’t provide a large enough presence/SPL for my large room - I’d be moving away from dual/tripple 6.5 inch 3-way speakers with dedicated mid ranges, to single 6.5 inch bookshelves…). In the past when I had towers with 8 inch woofers in the room, I loved their sense of scale and presence, so when/if I upgrade, I really want to go with something larger.
Not looking for advice on this (I’m pretty happy with my current home theater calibration). Just sharing my thoughts. I think the fact that Arendal wants their speakers to all use the same general drivers/wave guided tweeter, as well as its insistence on the larger drivers plays a big factor here. Maybe moving the woofers closer together like was suggested would help, but not sure.
I haven’t heard anyone actually complain about their centers who actually purchased one, and it seems like a lot of their customers would be the type that would, but who knows.
Last edited: