Thank you for your extended reply.
My point exactly:
This is what we would like to see from you, the true performance of the auto correction, in other words: the amount of lying.
Verification of the level of correction is quite easy, you can use a plain umic before and after calibration.
And of course, we are interested in the sinad after calibration, not before. Before calibration is for DAC's, but these are possessors, they will never be used as DAC's.. you know what i mean, if you want a dac, you just get a dac, this monoprice is not a dac, it just includes some dacs...
Trinnov audio also sells separately the microphone.
At low budgets, microphone is included, because noone will bother to pay a specialist to perform proper room equalization, it' out of budget.
My point exactly:
Yes, i know.However, keep in mind that almost all of them lie about the corrections they perform. The graphs they show are simulated correct curves, not remeasured.
This is what we would like to see from you, the true performance of the auto correction, in other words: the amount of lying.
Verification of the level of correction is quite easy, you can use a plain umic before and after calibration.
And of course, we are interested in the sinad after calibration, not before. Before calibration is for DAC's, but these are possessors, they will never be used as DAC's.. you know what i mean, if you want a dac, you just get a dac, this monoprice is not a dac, it just includes some dacs...
They are thinking that the average audiophile is not an expert in measurements, and there is no need to pay for a microphone he can not use, so a specialist certified for the equipment should perform the equalization, with his own microphone.even after paying $4,000, you don't get a measurement microphone with this processor! I don't know what they were thinking.
Trinnov audio also sells separately the microphone.
At low budgets, microphone is included, because noone will bother to pay a specialist to perform proper room equalization, it' out of budget.