Audiophile #3 that measures: These cables made no measurable difference in anything, but they have their uses. If they fit your need, buy them, or don't. You won't have any difference compared to what you are currently using besides aesthetics.Audiophile review #1: "I enjoyed the spacious sense of air that these thin, lightweight cables provided, it's like the music is skating happily over a frozen lake on a cold winter day."
Audiophile review #2: "These thin cables caused my sound to become horribly compressed, there were no dynamics and everything sounded flat."
Only if you fold them in half and add a PVC insulation in between... Because they're further away from each other compared to zipcord cables, inductance may be higher. But one has to take some measurements because effective diameter of each conductor is unknown.Isn't that stuff or similar construction supposed to be highly capacitive?
Yeah, AWG16 (a nominal 1.31 mm²) is a tad on the thin side. Its resistance is actually 2.5 times that of AWG12. Wouldn't recommend using that for runs of more than 1.5-2 m if you can help it. It's probably best used for those parts that are most critical in terms of space or looks, with conventional cable where that can be used without restrictions.
Isn't that stuff or similar construction supposed to be highly capacitive?
Yeah, AWG16 (a nominal 1.31 mm²) is a tad on the thin side. Its resistance is actually 2.5 times that of AWG12. Wouldn't recommend using that for runs of more than 1.5-2 m if you can help it. It's probably best used for those parts that are most critical in terms of space or looks, with conventional cable where that can be used without restrictions.
Isn't that stuff or similar construction supposed to be highly capacitive?