ROOSKIE
Major Contributor
Thanks so much for the excellent teardown.
I am in for one.
I am in for one.
230 × √2 or if you account for variance 250 × √2= 353Volt
120 × √2=170V. Close to 180V. (voltage doubler mode). Too close for my liking.
If you go 250V primary, it's closer. 353V to (series capacitor connection) 360V rated.
Most manufacturers use 200WV capacitors in series.
My favorite part of ASR!This thread reminds me of why I wandered over to these forums -- and stuck around! The teardowns are great!
Thanks so much for doing these; they're fascinating!
Happy Monday, all y'all!
Exactly. Too close.
Looking at the weak point of switching power supplies which tends to be the capacitor, we find a no-name Junzl brand:
View attachment 84034
Fortunately it is rated at 105 degree C so won't degrade quickly.
I am reminded of the story, possibly apocryphal, of the UK colour TV industry in the late 1960s/early 1970s. In those days, colour TVs were expensive, and not hugely reliable and thus expensive to repair. A lot of people rented theirs and in order for the rental agreements to be renewed, rental companies had to judge very carefully the reliability of their TVs. If the equipment failed too often, the companies would be out of pocket with repair costs, and customers would be unhappy at the frequent failures, although not unhappy that they were repaired for free. If the equipment was too reliable, then people wouldn't renew the rental on the basis that what were they paying all this money for, they might as well buy a TV on hire-purchase and risk the repair bills.
It turned out that 18 months between call-outs was about optimum. Customers thought they were getting value for their rental and not too annoyed, and the companies could afford one repair every 18 months. Not surprisingly, what failed was trivial to repair, and cost pennies, but would stop the TV working.
This could just be an urban legend, but I worked for a company that did have a laboratory that investigated MTBF very carefully to optimise reliability.
Now, equipment generally is pretty reliable, so stuff is made to fail software-wise or for fashion reasons.
S
That fan looks like exhaust (the motor side is usually the direction it blows to), either way an odd decision as exhaust fan blowing down will go against rising heat.
Mine just arrived. I won't be using it until Monday or Tuesday at the earliest. I did already disconnect that fan. (There was some glue at the connection point so if there is ever anyone else who sees this and is also disconnecting the fan, remove that connection slowly and work to break the glue bond.)I was thinking the same, it seems it blows air above downwards, which is quite odd, you generally want to blow hot air upwards right?![]()
A successful business model widely deployed over diverse industries and going back to the early days of the industrial revolution is where the profit made from the initial sale is minimal, with most of the money made from the perpetual servicing. Many radio & TV stores from the old days made much of their money from house calls to replace burned-out tubes. Glance inside to see which tube is melted or not glowing, replace it, check to see if the thing works. How about printer cartridges? Everyone knows that printer cartridges are a ripoff and that this is how the printer manufacturer makes the money off you, but what are you going to do? Even if you use original cartridges with refilled ink, you risk damaging your printer. And what about those electric toothbrush heads? Within a year or so you've spent more on the brush heads than you spent on the toothbrush. Hmmm. I'm surprised that no one has come up with an exotic cord that doesn't cost a whole lot initially, no more than your typical integrated amp, but that requires regular servicing in order to insure optimal performance.
Mine just arrived. I won't be using it until Monday or Tuesday at the earliest. I did already disconnect that fan. (There was some glue at the connection point so if there is ever anyone else who sees this and is also disconnecting the fan, remove that connection slowly and work to break the glue bond.)
I will report back and confirm whether or not this fan is indeed "optional" in a non-rack mount and running in stereo (not bridged) with typical 4-8ohm nominal speakers.
I realize this is not likely a hot commodity among the crowd here but FWIIW it seems solid and I like the utilitarian looks and feeling. $100 after discounts = seemly a good deal so far for what I am after.
Any updates? Looking at these at $106 for driving some surround speakers.
Did you (or anyone else here) end up replacing the fan in one of these?Thanks. I pulled the trigger. I'm going check what a replacement fan would look like as I have an assortment of 60 and 80mm fans hanging around.
Part No | Bearing | Voltage | V Range | Rated Current | RPM | m3/min | CFM | mm/H2O | in/H2O | dBA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGE08015F12U | F | 12 | 7.0~13.2 | 0.3 | 4500 | 1.28 | 45.2 | 5.23 | 0.21 | 43 | |
The power supply looks to have a removable jumper for the voltage doubler. It's obviously set for 120V (according to your rear photo). So it looks like it could be easily set for 230V countries by just unplugging the jumper. Main 180V capacitors are cutting it fine if you ask me.
View attachment 84038
@amirm Did you test the amp in bridge mode? That could be interesting.
Japan tried longevity, the product didn't die, so the company died.
South Korea tried the 3-year approach. It works.