• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Monitor Audio Apex A10 Speaker Review

Rate this speaker:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 108 62.1%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 60 34.5%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 3 1.7%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 3 1.7%

  • Total voters
    174
No real bass, colored sound, considerably elevated price. Beauty is in eye of the beholder, but in this case the industrial design makes a big deal out of the technicalities, which, obviously, do not deliver the goods. And there‘s no protection for the woofer either?!

It could be saved by a knowing user, low distortion etc, but then, was it a „lifestyle product“ in the better sense?
 
 
Htm200se2 look interesting looking into them.
 
They are active??
Sorry, my bad. I'm travelling at the moment and obviously stuffed up. Don't know why I though they were active.

On that basis I've downgradded my vote to "not terrible". $1500 is too much money for that level of performance when compared to say the Revel range of bookshelf speakers.
 
Typical Monitor Audio. Elevated harsh highs. Small useless waveguide or no waveguide at all (like in this case).
 
The criticisms here are fair: Monitor Audio should do better and strive for an objectively good sound, as KEF does, rather than an exciting/colored one. However, the speakers are still 100% better than others that simply would not fit onto one's desk. I'll be using them in the near field, elevated behind my PC displays, and addressing their deficiencies with a minidsp flex and KEF KC62 subwoofer. Almost all other traditional designs either do not fit or extend too much beyond my displays. Other viable options (i.e. below 20cm in depth) are Genelecs, KEF LSX II - both of these involve active speakers with their own deficiencies - or Radius 90 3G from the same company, which at the moment I have no idea if it's any better than the Apex A10. Regardless, I think the speaker is a GEM, and it should be marketed as a PC/desktop speaker/small stereo to match with the amp/DSP of one's choice - not just for home theater. The fact that it's form factor is so unusual and unique shows how much complacency there is in the speaker industry. It's unfortunate, but the truth is most people don't have much space to dedicate to speakers, as evidenced by the popularity of small bluetooth speakers. I would also go so far as to say that many people who want to do better end up using oversize speakers for their rooms that are bound to interact badly with their space, partly because of the lack of options and the false belief that bigger is always better. Placement is critical, and these speakers' diminutive size allows for that. I hope Monitor Audio comes up with a second version that addresses the current flaws while keeping the same size.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, I did have a bit of buyers remorse after I took the picture with headless panther and then started to write the review. :) As I noted earlier, it does have good power handling for this class of speaker and some EQ does it good.
I bought the Wharfedale Diamond 12.1 based on your review, and that to me is the reminder of what decent sound can be had at a quite low price.

"These" (Apex 10) are simply not even comparable sound or value wise, IMHO
 
what does lifestyle speaker mean? my lifestyle only includes speakers that look good on Amir's (or Erin's) measurements :facepalm:
 
I bought the Wharfedale Diamond 12.1 based on your review, and that to me is the reminder of what decent sound can be had at a quite low price.
Wharfedale has always made very well mannered budget speakers. I first heard their speakers twenty years ago (edit: time flies, it's more than that, oh my) and after that most model serieses at least briefly. I can't really recall any total misses.
When you take the next step to EVO4.2 (well under 1000€/pair) you still get some real return for the money in the class. Their "house sound" in budget speakers seems to be to take care of the most obvious horse shit resonance and after that leave it alone. Never perfect but never offensive. (No, I don't know their design principles, this is just a thought.)
 
I voted fine on the basis that they can be bought for £375 each here in the UK, and they include ceiling and wall mount in the box that isn't ugly and they have some curves that help them to look acceptable. Also based on using them with a sub.

Having recently looked for and bought speaker brackets to mount rectangular speakers on a wall, what's available does not look good so I would give the very acceptable looking mounting that's part of this speaker a value of £100 per speaker or more. Genelec ceiling mounts are £75 and very utilitarian looking for example.


However. Could they have done a better job of designing these speakers for frequency response and directivity? Yes they could have and should have. There is quite a lot of form over function in this design. If I was looking for wall mount speakers at this sort of price I would prefer a pair of Kef Q4 Meta.

The declared frequency response of up to 35khz is of concern to me as they will have spent time, money and design compromises to have a measurable response up that high when I basically can't hear much if anything over 15khz. That's a wasted 20khz of designed tweeter response. Plus some electronics produce noise in that area over 20khz and IDK but if the tweeter is playing that noise it could create feasibly cause distortion in the audible range.
 
Last edited:
what does lifestyle speaker mean? my lifestyle only includes speakers that look good on Amir's (or Erin's) measurements :facepalm:
It means speakers that can fit in a room that's designed for lifestyle more than listening. Which is most living spaces. At the same time not being too noticeable in the sense of people walk in and don't see the speakers until they wonder where the music is coming from instead of walking in and thinking 'Nice room but those speakers stick out like a sore thumb.'. More acceptable to interior designers and non-audiophiles in other words. Plus maybe could be used in a room like a kitchen where there is no place for a set of floorstanders or bookshelf speakers. That's what lifestyle speaker means to me.
 
I bought the Wharfedale Diamond 12.1 based on your review, and that to me is the reminder of what decent sound can be had at a quite low price.

"These" (Apex 10) are simply not even comparable sound or value wise, IMHO
If those Diamond 12.1 came with ceiling mounts then maybe they would be comparable. As I see it is there is no sensible way to mount those Diamond 12.1 or any similar bookshelf speaker on a ceiling so they don't even belong in the same category for comparison. For wall mounting, if you factor in the cost of a wall mounting bracket then the price in the UK is very comparable. The bookshelf on a bracket would look far uglier to me and, perhaps more crucially, much less likely to be acceptable to my wife.

To be fair I would only consider these Apex A10 for ceiling mounting as for most other situations there are better options out there. There are probably better sounding ceiling mount speakers out there for around £370 as well so that's why I only voted fine.
 
Last edited:
I've been using Monitor Audio products for many years now. This is very disappointing.

Fortunately, I wouldn't buy this kind of speaker irrespective of manufacturer. Be serious, or begone, I say.
 
Interested as to why people are voting this poor. OK, the EQ is not flat, but it seems you could easily flatten it out without any particular issues (it has good directivity). It is relatively expensive in the US, but much cheaper is the UK (this often goes the other way). It looks attractive and unobtrusive, almost like an Apple style product (like it or lump it, design wise).

I feel poor is a bit exaggerated as a rating tbh.
 
Interested as to why people are voting this poor. OK, the EQ is not flat, but it seems you could easily flatten it out without any particular issues (it has good directivity). It is relatively expensive in the US, but much cheaper is the UK (this often goes the other way). It looks attractive and unobtrusive, almost like an Apple style product (like it or lump it, design wise).

I feel poor is a bit exaggerated as a rating tbh.
So can I use dirac live to correct response?
 
It would be more useful if Amir reviewed any of their actually reportedly good speakers, such as the Silver 7G series and above rather than some crap lifestyle product that clearly doesn't match Monitor's reputation. I'm certainly not interpreting this review as indicative of the quality of the Monitor brand on the whole.
Amir donates his time and experience for the benefit of all. He only has so much time for ‘us’ and needs time harmony balance with his private life. He can also only do his magic on products that are time ‘donated’ to him for making the measurements. I would assume he would measure something like the Silver 7G or Klipschorn if someone were to send them to him. He might say a few choice words about moving the K-horns but he would measure them without bias.
 
Back
Top Bottom