Robert-Hifi
Active Member
I see why you have that impression, but I'd offer two thoughts:
1. On the contour plots the SP888 is overall quite similar if you look at the -6dB point. But if you look at the 0 to -3dB range, the SP888 is a bit more uneven than the KEFs above 1kHz, but it's also a bit "thicker"/wider than the Blade 2 Meta above about 2.5kHz and than the R1 above about 1.3kHz. My guess would be that Erin's assessment of this is based in part on his listening impressions, because those contour plots seem to show that the 888 might sound wider in radiation or might not.
2. The polar globe plots are not normalized. The 888 looks a lot narrower because all the SPL ranges are lower - it has less energy everywhere, not just in the direct and off-axis dispersion areas. Normalization would change the color-coding of those polar plots to reference 0dB, -3dB, -6dB, etc based on the speaker's top measured SPL level rather than an absolute SPL level.
1. I can see that the radiation width flares out just below 3 kHz and between 6 and 7 kHz on the SP888.
It's a bit more jagged than the KEF's, which are smoother. But Erin probably has his reasons to focus on the Contour Plots.
2. The SPL scale of the SP888 is higher at 93 dB and you could take the dark yellow and see it as red if the SPL scale were identical, correct? But even then it looks narrower?
Also strange that Polar Globe Plots of the SP888 aren't as solid red as on the SP8, while the coaxial driver is the same.
Erin did measure the SP888 at his new home and the SP8 at his old home, but that shouldn't have any effect.
Attachments
Last edited: