Did you actually read the review?
Yes, why are you asking me this. Did you read the review?Did you actually read the review?
Because the questions you aks are answered in the review. SINAD is not the only thing measured.Yes, why are you asking me this
I started looking at active crossovers like the dbx 223xs. This seems like an excellent choice for integrating the sub and mains, and I can still use the sub's built-in DSP...
I also like the fact that I can just turn a knob and instantly adjust the crossover frequency.
It is not that bad.That reminds me of the old saying. Tone controls make things worse, but to really screw things up requires an equalizer!
I suppose it’s even more true with dsp. Not just user error though. Also the quality of the filter implementations. Hopefully most manufacturers get the math right.
Do you recommend manually finding the resonant peaks and pulling down with peq or using the built in room eq app? I think Wiim has one but not sure.
I essentially agree with you.Your use-case is integrating a subwoofer
For that you need a multichannel DAC connected to the PC
That way, you will have 3 discrete channels to manage (volume, delay, crossover, everything) digitally, on the PC
This is a good example:
'DIY 2.2 living room project' https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/diy-2-2-living-room-project.57939/
Automatic systems should work fine, however, it is very easy to do this correction manually with REW as well.Do you recommend manually finding the resonant peaks and pulling down with peq or using the built in room eq app? I think Wiim has one but not sure.
Regarding the x-over, it is also worth to measure the SPL responses of both subs and mains separately, with x-over engaged, and to check in REW EQ window that the acoustic x-over slopes match the set x-over slopes. You can simply check by activating the correct target in the REW EQ window.Btw, my dbx 223 active crossover arrived today and I just tried it out. I'll say this, it has a huge impact on the sound. Like nothing I've heard in my living room before.
And it's a lot of fun to play with. It really is remarkable how different the sound is compared to just using the built in LPF in my sub and running the mains full bandwidth.
Not saying it's better necessarily, but it is definitely different and worth it to me just to hear what two perfectly matched 24dB/octave HP/LP filters can do for the overall blend. I think the best part is being able to just rotate a knob and immediately here the effect of the cutoff frequency change.
One thing that really surprised me so far is how good it sounds with the cutoff up high around 120-140 Hz. I never expected this. My main speakers (Dynaudio Special 40) are good down to 41Hz supposedly, and ported at 50. I like the natural bass of the Special 40s, so not sure I want to cross them over so high, but for now it's fun to play with.
I also have the WiiM Ultra now, but haven't had time to set that up yet. Looking forward to comparing the DSP bass management to the analog option.
Ideally, you should adjust both, delay and phase (via allpass filters). Adjusting only delay and not phase can be a very good compromise, however (my RME UFX II which I am using as x-over and DSP, e.g., has no allpass filters for phase adjustment).And don't forget about phase alignment. Having fully adjustable phase (NOT just a 0 or 180 degree switch) can make a significant improvement in some systems. Modern subwoofers, at least the well engineered ones, typically have fully adjustable phase, as do many DSP crossovers (all of the ones I have used). Either one is fine, but it may be a little more convenient to use the one in the crossover.
In my case there is only one crossover frequency so I won't be able to do this. I plan to look at the high, low, and combined spectrums on REW eventually.Regarding the x-over, it is also worth to measure the SPL responses of both subs and mains separately, with x-over engaged, and to check in REW EQ window that the acoustic x-over slopes match the set x-over slopes. You can simply check by activating the correct target in the REW EQ window.
What matters is the final acoustic response measured, not the x-over set (e.g. I have to use different x-over frequencies for low and high pass to get correct acoustic slopes on my subwoofers and perfect summation with my mains).
The crossover has only 0/180 on each of the 4 outputs, but my sub has fully adjustable -180 through 180 phase. So far, -180 sounds strongest in a quick listen.And don't forget about phase alignment. Having fully adjustable phase (NOT just a 0 or 180 degree switch) can make a significant improvement in some systems. Modern subwoofers, at least the well engineered ones, typically have fully adjustable phase, as do many DSP crossovers (all of the ones I have used). Either one is fine, but it may be a little more convenient to use the one in the crossover.
I'm guessing that it is all ownership bias. I can't really tell a difference ( at least nothing that I've noticed) between the WiiM and several AVRs, DACs I own.Which WiiM product has the streamer + DSP + DAC?
The Ultra is just 329. Is the quality really on par with the Cambridge Audio CNX v2? Seems rather inexpensive.
EDIT: After some reading it seems listeners are tending to like the cnx v2 sound better than the WiiM ultra.