I've already stated fairly publicly that the Tide16 is not for me. There were quite a few that said it was for them so let's see if it was all hype or not. LOL!you first
I've already stated fairly publicly that the Tide16 is not for me. There were quite a few that said it was for them so let's see if it was all hype or not. LOL!you first
Thanks, that was me who posted the question way back.
But the Tide 16 "only" attenuates digitally (never in the analogue domain), right?Does the Tide16 process 44.1 kHz sources at the native rate or does it up-sample everything to 48 kHz?
If it always up samples 44.1 kHz then it may be necessary to digitally attenuate to avoid inter-sample overs.
- Rich
Their specs say: Supported Sample Rate: 20 – 216 kHz sample rate converted to processing rate (48kHz)Does the Tide16 process 44.1 kHz sources at the native rate or does it up-sample everything to 48 kHz?
If it always up samples 44.1 kHz then it may be necessary to digitally attenuate to avoid inter-sample overs.
- Rich
I came over all nerdy and looked at all the HDMI extractor switches I could find that would pass 4k120 video and lossless Atmos audio.
They all had a lot in common - HDMI 2.1, HDCP 2.3, 48Gbps bandwidth, 8k60 and 4k120 video, and most supported VRR, ALLM, DV and HDR10+.
The differences are in whether the audio is output over regular HDMI or by HDMI eARC (or both).
The model numbers have links to the manufacturer's pages. Let me know if you find any others.
I particularly liked the FeinTech and Orei switches with multiple inputs and eARC output.
Since these are all so modestly priced, I think there's an opportunity to make the video switching disposable and updateable, and keep one good audio processor.
If it always up samples 44.1 kHz then it may be necessary to digitally attenuate to avoid inter-sample overs.
But the Tide 16 "only" attenuates digitally (never in the analogue domain), right?
Their specs say: Supported Sample Rate: 20 – 216 kHz sample rate converted to processing rate (48kHz)
I think Rich is right, because the need to accommodate inter-sample overs (normally a DA conversion issue) still apples to digital to digital conversion.Sample rate conversions have been pretty much entirely transparent for a long time now. Not a thing I would worry about at all.
www.audiosciencereview.com
Sound quality of my H16-AES isn't that great as soon as you increase volume levels. I can hear noticable distortion.
audiophilestyle.com
Regarding the CS8422, no matter which sample rate used, I got the same brittle, generic sound signature imposed on my audio with the RDL box. A shame as I paid $720 for it and it now sits in a box in my storage.
Even though the Tide16 does have some of attributes that one might exploit using digital outputs, like superior DSP and DAC, I agree.Fully digital tide16 next please![]()
It's niche even among the niche.AES digital connections to active speakers.
Yes, but so's an AudioPraise VanityPro...It's niche even among the niche.
Does the Tide16 process 44.1 kHz sources at the native rate or does it up-sample everything to 48 kHz?
If it always up samples 44.1 kHz then it may be necessary to digitally attenuate to avoid inter-sample overs.
- Rich
It only just ocurred to me that, yes, that would work.The Tide, like minidsp's Flex devices, have the input volume offset to deal with the inter-sample peaks issues if necessary.
It only just ocurred to me that, yes, that would work.
However, it would only work if the volume control was upstream of the ASRC.
My guess is that it would be downstream, so the volume control would be implemented after all possible inputs and sample rates had been converted to 48k for DSP.
How to handle ISPs
As explained above, ISPs become an issue when the sample rate of a full-scale digital audio signal is changed. Most modern DAC chips oversample their incoming audio stream, and are thus susceptible to distortion from ISPs.
In the miniDSP Tide16, while the internal digital processing uses floating-point arithmetic and is therefore not subject to the digital limit until the output to the DAC, it also has an integer-based asynchronous sample rate convertor (ASRC) at the input stage.
Our solution to ISPs in the Tide16 is to allow the user to reduce the level of the digital signal before it enters the ASRC. This is accomplished by setting the input volume offset of specific inputs to a negative value. A value of -2 to -4 dB is all that is needed:
![]()
Note that this measure is needed only if the digital signal is likely to contain ISPs. The most likely culprit is digital audio originating from a CD or file. As noted above, audio from streaming services is much less likely to have ISPs.
cThe Tide, like minidsp's Flex devices, have the input volume offset to deal with the inter-sample peaks issues if necessary.
www.audiosciencereview.com
And shipping is $30Tariffs are $875