welwynnick
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2023
- Messages
- 1,065
- Likes
- 1,344
YupSo this is impressive... but you need to get out more!
You're on AVF aren't you too - unusual user name
Yup
I've given up on AVF.
YupSo this is impressive... but you need to get out more!
You're on AVF aren't you too - unusual user name
Right gear allover, hideous looks though.
At 4500 euro street price in Europe you have stuff like M66 to compete for looks who literally wipes the floor with it in terms of looks.
If the targeted clients include the audiophile crowd, the first things to scrap is all the clutter of Doldy and BS in the front, these shout AVR not audio.
Complete deal breaker and it's a shame, it looks promising.
Base is $949 so that's ~45% increase. $3500 should cost around $5k if the same rate applies.I paid $1398 for the HTx and UMK-1 with shipping with Deer Creek Audio (it was the same price direct through miniDSP at the time once you added tariffs in check-out). Currently it looks like direct through miniDSP it is $1310 with shipping and tariffs, so the tariffs came down a little bit possibly.
If you’re talking about Dirac ART, the HTx isn’t compatible. It’s compatible with normal Dirac; ART is a new feature of the Tide16.
If you saw the measurements you will know that they all were pure digital ones through and through, so they all should be at the -140dB THD+N region if everything was in order.So I don't want to get into this and maybe misunderstanding your post.. but they subsequently released new firmware which "fixed" this? The conclusion being.. by the thread starter..
"Overall some really nice improvements in performance and love that they reached out and fixed this issue unprompted.
Michael"
...and, frankly, it didn't desperately really need fixing anyway IMHO.
I will stop the bear baiting now
Need to decide on HTX or this one.... problem is I ain't got anything now - having just sold my Denon!
I think this could have more impact than any other AVP, I think it's an almighty achievement, and still people criticise.
"If it works properly" is an appropriate qualification, but miniDSP always show their homework these days, and ASR etc generally back up their performance claims.
At its core for speaker processing, miniDSP is once again partnering with Dirac Research by including Dirac Live (RC), Bass Control (BC) and Active Room Treatment (ART) licenses at no extra cost. A flexible matrix mixer, advanced bass management and miniDSP’s full processing suite operate on all sixteen outputs,
Heck, has miniDSP ever even shipped a product that doesn’t rely on that same dinky Chinese remote across all their devices? No images of the Tide16 remote yet. These things make or break in home theater (especially with Logitech Harmony dead).
The Flex HT is a flawed product to need this to even have a chance of being useful (which makes me no want to support its existence by buying one), plus I'm not even sure it would achieve what I want. My use includes 4k UHD Blu-ray and PS5/PC audio rather than just streaming.Just use a Flex HT with an Apple TV 4K. I'm a sucker for minimalism so I'm not too happy about the size and price of the Tide16, but I don't really see a simpler version being a significant step up from the Flex HT either
This is such new territory for them we can’t take anything for granted. Multi-HDMI inputs, switching, and passthrough, and the necessity for a deep, logical on-screen menu system. The Marantz AV30 manual is 334 pages. That’s the sort of sophistication they need to build from scratch.
Looks like this could also be used as a crossover/processor for multiway active speakers? Any ideas on how capable the "Quad Core ARM processor / 1.8GHz " is in terms of DSP?
I have a PS5, Switch 2, LG 4K BD player, and Apple TV 4K so I've already overshot the inputs by 1. If I wanted to un-retire my Oppo universal player, SOL!The specific HDMI 2.1 feature that seems to be lacking (and could be a deal breaker for those with current gen gaming systems) is 4k 120Hz.
Nice. In another spot they specify "Quad Core A53 ARM processor, 1.8GHz".If it has a quad core ARM CPU it would be more than enough to do 16 channels of FIR, at 64k taps, at 48kHz. Probably more!
I missed that bit when I looked at the spec sheet. Now this has me excited. The only thing I would want is to remove all that Dirac BS and let me load my own FIR filters.
These are the processors I'm aware of that have multi channel digital outputs:
View attachment 504435
Those uses are not a problem. I agree that an ATV 4K or similar device being necessary feels silly, but if it makes the device half the price, I don't think it's a bad design choice at all.The Flex HT is a flawed product to need this to even have a chance of being useful (which makes me no want to support its existence by buying one), plus I'm not even sure it would achieve what I want. My use includes 4k UHD Blu-ray and PS5/PC audio rather than just streaming.
It's true that they said the could not do this (add dolby and other formats) to their base code for the flex models.That’s the sort of sophistication they need to build from scratch.