I am not talking about sampling nor analog system.
I am talking about time and level sensitivity of human hearing.
Try to measure it and put the graphs here.
Let us have some fun
44,1kHz is fine enough.
I use oversampling and superslow filter.
OT still.
Ports will sum.But those seven ports are strange. Is it supposed to be like Dragon Ball or something?
Seven is a sacred number, because the human head has seven holes.
I don’t remember the source of this, I read it somewhere a long time ago. Cardboard and plastic tubes are cheap; it would be nice to see speakers with seven holes more often.
Well nose and ears follow the same path in that case, that's 4 more, no?I like to ask my medical friends, "how many holes does a human body have?". They start counting. Then I remind them that a topological "hole" has to be continuous. As humans are coelomates, we only have one hole (mouth to ****). Everything else is an invagination.
Loaded tweeter?I don't remember the source, but I'm sure that text was written before the advent of topology as we understand it.
More to the topic: we need Børresen's drawing, then we can count both holes (in all senses) and invaginations.
LoserA new interview of Michael Børresen appears to explain a lot.
I am not talking about sampling nor analog system.
I am talking about time and level sensitivity of human hearing.
Try to measure it and put the graphs here.
Let us have some fun
44,1kHz is fine enough.
I use oversampling and superslow filter.
OT still.
These multi ports are nothing special, just classic laminar if the best.I found a photo that clearly shows all the ports on the Børresen.
With this many openings, I feel like even if a golf ball accidentally made a “hole-in-one” into one of them, nothing would change — and no one would ever notice.
View attachment 494099