• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Micca RB42 Bookshelf Speaker Review

GGroch

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 7, 2018
Messages
1,059
Likes
2,049
Location
Denver, Colorado
Yeah I think the RB42's are sort of a weird "niche" speaker. They are a really small speaker that actually might not be well-suited for near-field/desktop use. They seem to need some space.....

This matches my experience with them. Because the rear port provides so much of the bass content, the location has tremendous impact on the speakers sound. In general I have found sealed or front ported speakers less room dependent than designs like this. On the other hand, in the right room, or using digital room EQ like I did (a Paradigm PW/amp) they can sound amazing.
 

Nathan Raymond

Active Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Messages
212
Likes
211
This matches my experience with them. Because the rear port provides so much of the bass content, the location has tremendous impact on the speakers sound. In general I have found sealed or front ported speakers less room dependent than designs like this. On the other hand, in the right room, or using digital room EQ like I did (a Paradigm PW/amp) they can sound amazing.

Attention needs to be given to rear-ported speakers and their distance from a wall. The best article I've seen covering the ins and outs on the topic is:

https://sonicscoop.com/2017/12/14/the-1-speaker-placement-tip-speaker-manuals-get-completely-wrong/
 

Sgt. Ear Ache

Major Contributor
Joined
Jun 18, 2019
Messages
1,894
Likes
4,151
Location
Winnipeg Canada
Yeah the wall behind my speakers is a hollow wall with thin wood panelling...I think it's essentially a giant passive radiator. I try and remove it from the equation if I can...
 

mhardy6647

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
11,217
Likes
24,181

fabien32

Active Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Messages
111
Likes
18
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Micca RB42 bookshelf/desktop computer speaker. I purchased my sample from Amazon and it cost US $149 including Prime shipping. This speaker also seems to be the favorite of youtube bloggers, helped partly by generous seeding of such "reviewers."

The RB42 looks stunningly good for such a budget price if you stand a bit far:


Curved cabinet with excellent fit and finish that would be at home (if it were a larger cabinet) in a high-end audio shop.

Zoom in though and you see that budget pricing doesn't get you perfection:


I don't know what the two white dots are. They would not come off easily. The lousy gluing job of the dust cap encourages one to put them far from eyesight.

The back panel impresses again with nice binding posts:


If you didn't tell me in advance and I did not look closely, I would have thought these are $400 to $500 speakers.

Measurements of the Micca R42 were performed using the Klippel Near-field Scanner (NFS). This is a robotic measurement system that analyzes the speaker all around and is able (using advanced mathematics) to subtract room reflections. It also measures the speaker at close distance ("near-field") which sharply reduces the impact of room noise. Both of these factors enable testing in ordinary rooms yet results that can be more accurate than anechoic chamber. In a nutshell, the measurements show the actual sound coming out of the speaker independent of the room.

Spinorama Audio Measurements
Acoustic measurements can be grouped in a way that can be perceptually analyzed to determine how good a speaker can be used. This so called spinorama shows us just about everything we need to know about the speaker with respect to tonality and some flaws:

View attachment 48626

There are lots of peaks and valleys in the on-axis (black) and listening window (dashed green) indicating everything you play with be EQed to that tune. The excessive energy from a few thousand hertz and up indicates this will be a "bright" sounding speaker which may impress people at first listening ("great resolution and imaging") but becomes tiring quickly.

The boost in 200 to 300 Hz is a common technique to give the impression of more bass than there really is.

Since the speaker was driven with 2.83 volts signal, we can directly read the sensitivity from the frequency response graph. Depending on what region you use and what averaging you perform, you get something in 80 to 85 dB which is within the manufacturer specs.

Zooming into the difference between our direct sound and what travels around the room gives us high level of non-uniformity:

View attachment 48627

This means two things:

1. You can't EQ these regions because EQ can't just fix the reflections that have different tonality than direct sound. It changes both so the net gain is zero.

2. Speaker will sound different in different rooms. So while you may swear it sounds great for you, it may very well not for an other person with different room/environment.

If you were to use these in far-field, i.e. normal stereo listening away from desk, this is the response you can expect to see:

View attachment 48628

Hard to know where to draw that line. Regardless, you will have a very uneven frequency response.

So overall, this is far from even and neutral response that you would like to have in a speaker. Listening impressions at the end.

Speaker Impedance Measurements
There is a pretty low dip in impedance making this speaker rather hard to drive when combined with its low efficiency:

View attachment 48629

Distortion Measurements
I have no way of verifying the correctness of these distortion measurements but here they are:

View attachment 48631

View attachment 48632

These are all in-room measurements of my large garage. Since there is no real response below 50 Hz, I would ignore that region.

Advanced Speaker Measurements

View attachment 48633

View attachment 48634


View attachment 48635

We can see how the woofer starts to "beam" (narrow its output cone) around 2 kHz before the tweeter takes over with its wider directivity (cone):

View attachment 48636

View attachment 48637

Spin data is enclosed.

Speaker Listening Tests
I evaluated the Micca RB42 on a 5 inch stand on my desk since that is likely how it will get used. I powered it using the Purifi amplifier.

I was pleased that I had not shaved as the sharp highs nicely took care of any facial hair I had! This thing is bright. It also gets distorted quickly. If you see the woofer flapping around, it is distorted.

Toeing it out did not help much. What did help a bit was me plugging the port using my hand. I should test it that way and see what difference it makes.

I guess it is better than any plastic computer speaker. But if you are here to find something that produces proper sound, the RB42 is not it.

Conclusions
If something sounds bright to my aging ears, you better believe it is bright. I am surprised the online bloggers like this speaker as they are younger than me so they likely hear more of the high-pitched tones out of this. At times this was so bad I had sit farther back!

I suggest getting a powered studio monitor instead of these. You don't have to an amplifier for them and those that I have tested have far better objective and subjective response.

Net, net, the Mica RB42 is very well built as far as the cabinet and such, but when it comes to sound, it is not something I can recommend.

That said, the night is young and we don't have much data on other bookshelf speakers like it. We will get better calibrated as we test more (of which I have a good number waiting to be tested).

I am really confused here, I have a perfect pitch earning, and without any doubt i can say this one of the best sounding speakers I ever heard, so I don't understand how the measurement can be so bad with such devine sound.
 

Art of sound

Active Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2021
Messages
130
Likes
43
Location
california
@amirm I am using them sideways with the liquid spark DAC and SMSL SA300 and my 1/3 octave readings always show elevated at the 100Hz at around 50-55db

If you ever revisit these speakers again by happenstance could you consider a sideways FR graph measurement.
 

Automated

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2021
Messages
5
Likes
1
So I'm looking for a nearfield setup for my wife's computer. We're looking for something with a very small footprint. I have an older pair of Pioneer bs-40 and those are way too large.

Considering these or a used pair of Energy RC-mini or Energy CB-5. Any thoughts or ideas for better options?
 

Jungstar

Active Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2019
Messages
115
Likes
36
Shame about the vertical directivity; for the price I’m assuming they know most owners will not use toe-in, hence being bright on-axis. Wonder how it’s more famous baby brother would perform.
Preference Rating
SCORE: 4.4
SCORE w/ subwoofer: 6.6
How is the Subwoofer rating calculated? Distribution of scores?
I mean most speakers really benefit but some more...
 

Art of sound

Active Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2021
Messages
130
Likes
43
Location
california
I was wrong. These things are bright (Even with a treated room and a DAC that is soothing (not flat))
 

pavlo_y0l0s

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2022
Messages
21
Likes
15
For those wondering, here is twitter crossover schematics:

rb42-twitter-cov.PNG


And here is what frequency graph looks like:

rb42-twitter-cov-freq.PNG


Note: this is for the generic driver that comes with Vituix CAD software, not Micca driver - I'm assuming they make those in house and FRD/ZMA files are not gonna be available to the public.

At the top point of frequency response we have 77.8 dB level. This level is between 5,614Hz to 6,289Hz.

I wonder if increasing 1.5 ohm resistor will fix how bright this speaker is?

Increasing it to 2.7 ohm reduces the level to 76 dB and new graph looks like this:
rb42-twitter-cov-freq-mod.PNG


I'm new to this so any input will be appreciated!
Thank you!
 

digicidal

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 6, 2019
Messages
1,981
Likes
4,838
Location
Sin City, NV
For those wondering, here is twitter crossover schematics...
I'd rather completely bypass Twitter (and Facebook for that matter)... but welcome! ;)

On the serious side, it appears that would help the brightness to a decent extent - at the very least it's pulling down the right region. It would be pretty cheap to try out and see if you liked the change considering the cost of the speaker and a resistor.
 

Art of sound

Active Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2021
Messages
130
Likes
43
Location
california
I wanted to check if anyone measured these speakers after using it for a while like 50 hours or more. i don't know wheres the break in gang at but i've heard from Z about these speakers sounding really bright at first ( which i concur) and i have these in many rooms over the years and moving them out by 1-2 ft and using spinorama's eq + room damping floor and side wall changed my view of this speaker. Itd be nice to have these remeasured so quantify the break-in (or put and end to) theory once and for all.
 
Top Bottom