• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Micca MB42X G2 Budget Speaker Review

Rate this budget speaker:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 4 1.8%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 27 12.2%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 118 53.4%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 72 32.6%

  • Total voters
    221
Nice with your tests of speakers, so thanks for this one Amir. :)

A nice speaker. Maybe it will be sold in several countries of Europe, if the demand exists/increases? :)

Is the dip around 2 kHz as wide and large enough so you can say that Micca MB42X G2 has a BBC dip? If so, they can be seen as a cheaper and better (lower distortion) alternative to the BBC LS3/5A (plus clones thereof).
 
Nice with your tests of speakers, so thanks for this one Amir. :)

A nice speaker. Maybe it will be sold in several countries of Europe, if the demand exists/increases? :)

Is the dip around 2 kHz as wide and large enough so you can say that Micca MB42X G2 has a BBC dip? If so, they can be seen as a cheaper and better (lower distortion) alternative to the BBC LS3/5A (plus clones thereof).
My first thought was, this is a mini Wharfedale 12.1 for a good bit less money
 
If you think that's crazy, see <https://www.dansette.com/shop>!
o_O

Twenty five years ago, my next record player, a Hacker GP42 bought in December 1970 and which my Dad was keeping until he passed, sold at auction for a fiver :( This had a proper 7W transformer coupled valve amp in it too and a nice oval Celestion-made 10" x 6" speaker in the front as well.

Sincere apologies folks for the thread diversion. Us oldies can't always help ourselves...
 
Nice with your tests of speakers, so thanks for this one Amir. :)

A nice speaker. Maybe it will be sold in several countries of Europe, if the demand exists/increases? :)

Is the dip around 2 kHz as wide and large enough so you can say that Micca MB42X G2 has a BBC dip? If so, they can be seen as a cheaper and better (lower distortion) alternative to the BBC LS3/5A (plus clones thereof).
Not sure the BBC had this dip early on unless it was a design shortcoming. The original Spendor BC1 and the LS3/6 derived from it were as flat in the lower kHz region as an early 70s speaker allowed and pretty good over the ~4khz crossover region if heard on the super-tweeter axis. The 'BBC Dip' I believe came later on, when sound editors wanted a dip for listening comfort with the then new poly-coned models (certainly why the LS5/9 measures as it does as a pal was on the engineering staff at the BBC and heard a few samples as the model was developed, not so sure the larger LS5/8 however).

Forget the LS3/5A as a 'high fidelity' speaker please. It never was intended for that purpose (discussed many times and my reasoning comes from an original design-team member) and was initially adopted domestically because it was so darned small in 1974 or thereabouts.
 
Pretty impressive... But as they are passives I might still recommend JBL 305p mk2 in this budget range, since the price would tend to even out once amps are accounted for.

But if someone is trying to do a budget surround system or they already have an amp... This is probably the value champ.

Also seems like a plausible target for a DIY upgrade kit. "Just" 3D print a new baffle with WG and swap it in, and you could correct the major flaw of this speaker without upsetting the value proposition. It would cost maybe $15-20 per pair in materials to do that.
 
Pretty impressive... But as they are passives I might still recommend JBL 305p mk2 in this budget range, since the price would tend to even out once amps are accounted for.

"The PB42X is how we take an already great product and make it even better. It is the natural extension of the MB42X’s success – everything we love about the MB42X is there, and now powered. The frontier of affordable high quality sound is pushed ahead even further with the addition of high quality amplification."

$139.99/pr at Amazon.
 
Pretty impressive... But as they are passives I might still recommend JBL 305p mk2 in this budget range, since the price would tend to even out once amps are accounted for.

Someone mentioned an ($400?) active speaker earlier and how this might "even out". That seems to assume someone doesn't already have an amp. I think I have at least 15-20 amps (counting all of the little Class-D modules) sitting around my house.

Edit: I do see your qualification "if they already have an amp"

...
Also seems like a plausible target for a DIY upgrade kit. "Just" 3D print a new baffle with WG and swap it in, and you could correct the major flaw of this speaker without upsetting the value proposition. It would cost maybe $15-20 per pair in materials to do that.
Yes, there does seem to be an opportunity here.
 
Make them powered for $15...

 
Can a diy passive subwoofer be added to this ?
The MB42X G2 is a passive bookshelf speaker like any other.

If you have an Amp capable of driving both stereo speakers and a passive subwoofer, then yes you can add one to these.
 
I'd get the Edifier MR4 any day at $80 here in Eastern Europe. The Miccas can play 2-3dB louder and a few Hz deeper, but the tweeter dispersion flaring is atrocious. Also, you need an amp for them. Edifiers win by a great margin for me. And this is at the US price, because the Miccas cost a lot more here, almost double the Edifiers. I could even call the Miccas pretty bad value at the price I could get them here.
 
Back
Top Bottom