Soandso
Major Contributor
- Joined
- May 30, 2022
- Messages
- 1,360
- Likes
- 3,422
Not sure what you’re getting at here since they still take Medicare and Medigap plans which are subject to the same pressures. My take is the Mayo Clinic was tired of being stiffed by these Advantage plans.
This is not entirely true as there are exceptions. For instance you continue working past 65 and are covered by an employer plan you can join a supplement when you retire without penalty or higher premiums as my wife did.
I'm "getting at" since medical service costs have risen so fast that some providers, like Mayo Clinic, are no longer satisfied receiving the sum of money which Medicare and not Med.Advantage deems authorized for any specific coded service(s) provided. This is not a matter of stiffing a provider because they either can accept or opt out of accepting the Medicare coded payment amount since Med.Advantage plans only agree that their member plans (including co-pays) pay providers, like Mayo Clinic, what Medicare approves in U$.
Basically for each person enrolled in a Med.Advantage plan Medicare annually assigns a gross sum of money prorated to each Med.Advantage plan for duly administering that person's Medicare coverage paperwork. If after the year is up the person has utilized Medicare coded services in excess of that annual assigned amount then Med.Advantage must pay that out of it's profits. The flip side is if Med.Advantage has enough members who do not use more medical services than the total U$ Medicare pledged for all plan members then Med.Advantage still makes a profit.
I get statements from my Med.Advantage plan showing service provider, date rendered, amount provider bills, U$ amount Medicare approves for the coded service, amount Med.advantage paid for that service and if I might have any U$ sum to also pay. The combined amount of what I pay (rarely anything) plus the amount Med.Advantage pays always adds up to just the U$ amount Medicare itself legally approves for any coded service I had received from the billing provider.
Item:
Yes, working at Medicare age has the nuance you mention. I was retired at 65 so don't think about that.
Last edited: