The RME forum software is pretty restrictive at times. Just send them an email. As for the sound quality, ask them about the appropriate reference level - they will have good suggestions. But first try it in your main system.
And now for my own subjective impressions, apart from the fact that it measures perfectly. I came from an old Quad 33 pre amplifier, using analogue outputs of a Bluray player, a television and a Chromecast Audio. Power amplifier is a refurbished Quad 606-2. Of itself that has a very high input sensitivity of 0.5 Volt, but I lowered it with two 16 dB inline attenuators. Speakers are Quad 2805 plus a B&W PV1d sub (with Antimode 8033 dsp room eq of the sub). My impression of the sound is precisely how I like it: ultraclean, transparent and undistorted, even at quite high levels, and without any trace of harshness. It was certainly better than the old situation, even though I don't know whether the improvement was due to a better DAC or a better preamplifier. My hunch is both.
I am using auto reference level, and also dynamic loudness. After a couple of REW measurement sessions I decided to use the filters in the RME to attenuate some bass peaks coming from the main speakers. I also decided to use the tone controls to aproximate the Harman curve. But even before that, there never was any harshness.
Finally, of course such transparent gear is a sometimes uncomfortable window into the bad recording quality of some music. If you really want to know what your ADI-2 is doing, play some well recorded classical music or acoustic jazz. Pop/rock etc is so processed that there is no natural point of reference.