• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Measurements of Marantz CD6006 CD Player

Robciak

Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2022
Messages
18
Likes
175
Hi,
This is my second attempt at CD player measurements, based on the knowledge I gained from ASR. Many thanks to the members who contributed to developing this part of the reviews, especially @NTTY, who shared their measured files with me. Some of these files were used in this review.

The device under test is Marantz's CD player, model CD6006, which has been replaced by model CD6007. CD6006 costs around $600.

Measurements were conducted for both the analog and optical outputs (results for the optical and coaxial outputs were identical). The following results do not include measurements for the headphone output, which will be added to this thread later.

AD_4nXdBgyT2Y5VYemkdr5eV4ys5GM--J5H4q0GrZr1AL6EKuJYHyu-8rs7xC4VbCE2_FLNQqjSFH_Y0N3ClMWJZF7Tsm_Z12sRrzDcP0EWWLFvD0m5YkG8DnONyWnviJ0vlWWKWqxuQ
AD_4nXcQpFN0Pm5hAMqGS4UGpGBW3y3lvGnANBpj1YOxsjMxOwL-y11TCz-HL1f2VDd0k7G4Jl4S4ZOIyaDifJ6bfWzqXbQHrEEF5Vuf6MlbeROGtdFlHLyMadVHacCsZXZilQtfSBRR



The measurements were conducted using the Audio Precision APx525 audio analyzer with the following settings:
1733155690809.png
AD_4nXd2XZRIG2vjZ1OiiykIFLgejqo8iIcVWnRtxDwhDSw9nH-2Uqh1T1VKeyyUPEVaoReXvNGknKNnkoZxEui_43o42k-rvvI7EcuhpgQL9KaHHdVOmlONUqIANGtOIazXvojG-4nNZg


Measurements

RMS Level
The output level is close to the 2V standard for unbalanced outputs.

Analago output (stimulus sine 999,91 Hz / -0,01 dBFS)
AD_4nXc_VTR4ZArVsO7YlnfYJa-0Y_nxWouyPd7rX_Hr4ezVLqko_dBG-Co7VMItWN0rp864TwSD4-tHk1sjATyIJgLX8vXw0RgEkKqiZ5r1BZ30IZGaDwGTuA8k7_Pr0-hWSfzc1azhVg


THD+N
Using a self-dithered sine wave at 999.91 Hz, measurements were provided with 16-bit resolution. Results for the analog output are very close to this level. Below are the results for the optical output for comparison.

Analago output (stimulus sine 999,91 Hz / -0,01 dBFS)
AD_4nXcpPzk54HG5xT9TUYhB3ONHEGh_7aRBmhEPiZ8gl7oIWFbjswwag1MjabEuJtWA1KNXFOKkDvVTI7Y6c3N2VadJepBI5NUD7UnVqNFJrUhAmaZrC_ZgHSIIIPT_GLlUJks3-vhYOA
AD_4nXd-4vYqYBhnppGkXubkqcE_1sMWYHnFflxbVh3VAFLiKSFXA6ZhBZ7e2dyMav3EYVRVAVwbSXFqM8PXk40oWoSxlV9Okwox6kq696JUJtNFOTQgpsisCaVxKc_Wul3I3l2kJaR7


Optical output (stimulus sine 999,91 Hz / -0,01 dBFS)
AD_4nXfsaesCXwQOK6dc_ZlpDN45shDpS6UL8DF8YJN7DTA0z30RNNk_6C-lu1zgQv_6t-1HUErvkF19vSQzBicgy7e7lR3BAwz_IBAxUeZUrqiqJvE7V2-JMWgrrzokMXffCCZr45vYyA
AD_4nXeMclUwZa74ay1T5Agc2OUNC5F7M3NE0iaokPIHp4B05pBaiEZXu2MVlW7oEYkWO6Dteq-GtzvcetJKjQGFe6e1GOX5BuQ9UGTz5QS6K0csPGz_OQReMdwbWrLTYSAhaR389BW2


Dynamic Range
Dynamic range measurements were conducted using a standard dithered tone at 997 Hz. The analog output is clouse to the theoretical file limit.

Analog output (stimulus sine 997 Hz / 0 dBFS)
AD_4nXe5idxt_0bDk9_fe2yepkWJjJlSo6W_-i1LBtiZNMXlS0Q1PsoDHn8h4Ei1nl8xhp2QAlghlFCeAIsak0YmxTSCHqYyAvD4WQGXGPl6bbHBrbuFLbx-d66Zpf_KztI9LZF-vdR_wQ


Optical output (stimulus sine 997 Hz / 0 dBFS)
AD_4nXfhaT2dWWv7ejsWUWBwprxbgZEd72cYjJEiapS5wVWVs4OBsRHOca5RDxdN2auo2KED1aSixKh9LNN6JBQF-JX2SGE-tto1kqg2J2cvJvB3mlp0zzQkVGjtIqWsqWYHncsoMaPP


Frequency response
Frequency response measurements were performed using two stimuli: a sweep from 5 Hz to 20.05 kHz at -0.01 dBFS and a sweep from 20 Hz to 20 kHz at -0.01 dBFS. In both cases, the deviation was minimal, barely exceeding 0.05 dB.

Analog output:
Stimulus: sweep 5-20,05k Hz / -0,01 dBFS and sweep 20-20k Hz / -0,01 dBFS
1733156595616.png
1733156620589.png


Optical output:
Stimulus: sweep 5-20,05k Hz / -0,01 dBFS and sweep 20-20k Hz / -0,01 dBFS
AD_4nXdLaLkF3ZqfeeWlZkivmzM7F8tgPKkXufE6asWUUHqslyEpxGjjA7CZKhtEDbpue6U-uvTXLA56qMBYMY-WEloJFzbaOzjOdH9WC2ZTSEgBL3-R6hpgVgqWaQe1i50R-uPQC8ct2Q
AD_4nXeDR91-54wOjdFcsZ0kVaTKgsaKFOwPL-V6XY3HB3Y8pyF1vFtRSXF6MXCtjdrHnPey5Z1e6Yp8DfDe8VztjJ_ZzOqvtPdrvWy4Sl3IVZ37qVOjxanfcoAIIw4O1tl0cE5_oi3piw


FFT spectrum
For the analog output, the FFT of a 999.91 Hz tone shows that the first harmonics are above the -120 dB level. The optical output exhibits no such issues.

Analog output and Optical output
Stimulus: sine 999,91 Hz / 0,01 dBFS
AD_4nXcSrXJP2jE--tBaZwX9-2teZ-9rEGYY_EN7sRDRzGPrNAuiFsXReiCle5VFgGunt1s8mpJ1yEmxhlNiur3YGaPoVioNVj-u4iWoC4V_uXWDLy-QeznHmWXqtQtDYcB1PSLM2SOA
AD_4nXcRCLgr9WJd6hBP8XFcrTWuXM7NzlaTAqPpZd6ZUaE6-CZEsYv2F5AyKrr7uTEZzjuVK7YUe4Z5AnUT9ZjiCzYJS1pB66eY4ntN3CYby-hjW5fqNR2v3SYcepSgN7TFylZdnr61cg


Multitone
The multitone stimulus was dithered, which increased the noise floor. The analog output maintained a flat noise floor across the entire range, which is good, but a single distortion component is visible in the spectrum.

Analog output and Optical output
Stimulus: multitone 10-20k Hz | -10 dBFS | Decade 1/10 | Dither 16 Bits
1733155518958.png
1733155546643.png



Jitter
The green dotted line represents the file on the test CD and it is a reference. Anything projecting beyond it is distortion.
For simplicity, only Channel 1 is shown, as Channel 2 gave identical results.

Analog output
Stimulus: j-test tone
AD_4nXeqJGDoaKRRuSH8IkYBiGoKadfAXkzawxX0ciENNizPBPN0Dl2gXRzlrTcLZST_x0bc74wrK5OH0k5pDpxSobQxs2pXShOe792neS5-5hxhvrIuNzGA2fyaTzFtHFCOUt437vabpw
AD_4nXeN6kjpasf9HhQqoovOf9oHgMJRxRaxE4N2YeqQAhFTBesUv7kiU2wlIohdxml3EIC5HFwGISfSRvJZNPbFqex61t0NUPTyqrL_UOi8LpKyoDMixdLuLMKSa9B_mVdQrTKPWLaC0A


Intermodulation distortion
There is some issue in analog output. Optical out shows a reference.

Analog and optical
Stimulus: Dual tone 60 and 7kHz / 4:1 amplitude ratio
AD_4nXeT1ZHtRvoqzX9X4MNqI1V-QfpXU6-vMXO4K3A8s1UdMV5kgJ4uIYq5NfmgmcJq-uxiPIKIk6ARrF9qONa1RPnd6hOIgLua1mrRJHSzn4aGsIMb7YnCNnG_T-Ga-ZcrMt1rjt-v0g
AD_4nXdS8vmozxe1926Oraxy77G9c-cdBqHo8GpbdLba_uicAZeageXJKraZcX10PKawBXAndHGLrD7__D1EZSLSS3UdiWKdtAE_BRASKbDlKfCaxmCXfWGj3lJIT0cXRAecka_RIaKv7w


Crosstalk
For left and right analog channels.
Stimulus: sine 999,91 Hz / 0,01 dBFS
AD_4nXc7ChIZiHsozTLSUXWnSAVG_q--rmGcwJZLxoMiju7do-2ChFO2gvBkMk3Ifj-hm9SE1B1BCJIH71QxbL9texqqOxAxDybVy2knsn9r8fVsqVfyklHp0Baes5bbx1Q8McDBqY1P
AD_4nXchcsBhuA6OqJ4Rf-vT923CCZ8gxL6JUCBM2baGtC3JClsZjbnPgYFSoEJ8ev7s45utGuWYFghMxvb8wTg0tzmoEoRaOWHpXVfAcH3a2q0uGfHlsUjs8ZSdAlWN3HbZ8d9y8kfH
 

Attachments

  • 1733156564730.png
    1733156564730.png
    150.4 KB · Views: 20
This is a great review, thanks!

Performances are really good.

I usually perform the BW measurement at -12dBFS, it puts less stress on the device. At -0.01dBFS you risk clipping as some players have a slight output difference over bandwidth. It could impact bandwidth measurement in some cases.

We’re only missing the filter attenuation view (from white noise and view up to 96kHz) ;)

Did you try inter-sample over tests?
 
Last edited:
Thank you! This is relatively slow filter with max attenuation at around 26kHz, which is a bit far. That’s why the mirror images of 18k and 20k test tones are not much attenuated.
In the end, it looks very similar to filter 2 of the CD6007.
 
Back
Top Bottom