• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Measurements of a $5 DAC

Robciak

Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2022
Messages
18
Likes
167
Hi,

this is a review of digital to analog converter which I bought on a local (Polish) e-commerce platform. Since it is a no-name company, I called it $5 DAC which also indicates its price.
You can easily find similar DACs on Amazon or Aliexpress but the price can vary from $5 to $20. The device is dedicated mostly as a DAC for TV, which which can be powered directly from a TV's USB port.

DAC included power supply cable (without bridge) and optical cable.

Please note:
- I used a old iPhone model charger and the included cable to power the DAC. The performance observed when powering the DAC via USB was lower, and was not included in the measurements below,
- The input level was 0 dBFS. If a different amplitude is used, this will be specified in the measurement description,
- There are no differences between optical and coaxial input so all the following results refer to optical input,
- The following review doesn'tt contain a measurement of built-in headphone amplifier.

Any comments on my measurement procedure or presentation of results are welcome.

This is how 5$ DAC looks like:
IMG_20241108_133126271.jpg
IMG_20241108_133133410.jpg
IMG_20241108_133142803.jpg


1731529977378.png



Measurements were conducted on Audio Precision APx525 audio analyzer with the following settings:

1731517577728.png


MEASUREMENTS

RMS Level

Output Level is way under the 2 Volts standard.
Here is a result for 1kHz and in the range 20-20k Hz.

RMS Level.jpg
1731518171238.png


Frequency response
This is what happens when you buy the cheapest DAC because all looks the same. It has an incredibly poor frequency response that drops off after 1 kHz.

1731518425448.png


FFT spectrum and Jitter
For a 1 kHz input, the FFT shows THD distortion reaching -65 dB for the third harmonic. We can observe all harmonics and each of them takes a high value.

1731518568151.png


Multitone shows lots of mess even in the low and medium range.

1731518783762.png


Without surprises, Jitter also showed distortion.

1731519067673.png


Dynamic Range
Results correspond to around 17 bits for both channels.

Dynamic Range - AES17.JPG


THD+N
Total harmonic distortion and noise are very high. The result below gives barely 10 bits dynamic.

THD+N Ratio.JPG


Here is a plot describing the THD+N ratio versus the measured level. It is worth noting that increasing levels also increase distortion. Distortion also highly depends on frequency. The below plot shows results for 250, 1k, 6k and 16k Hz. The X-axis also indicates how the measured level differs at different frequencies.

1731520166925.png


Here is a THD+N in the frequency domain for a 0 dBFS input signal. Unusual behaviour of a curve that rises and then falls sharply.

1731528656247.png


Intermodulation distortion
Intermodulation distortion has a high value across the band further increasing with frequency.

SMPTE Ratio.JPG
1731528986417.png


Summary
As you can see the $5 DAC offers very poor quality and can't be recommended as a TV upgrade.

I am aware that this is a $5 DAC, however the same converter, you can buy on other auctions even for a dozen dollars. At such a price you can find other converters with satisfactory performance.
 
Very welcome report.
You cetainly don't use AP only for checking garbage DAC .....
 
And this is why I don't say all DACs sound the same
 
That's one of those "BOM error" DACs (I've seen quite a few so far, in different from factors) where someone selected completely wrong low-pass filter capacitors. Non-existing design review and non-existing production quality control.
 
And this is why I don't say all DACs sound the same
No-one else here says this either. Sometimes you might see people say it without the qualifiers (well measuring or measuring transparent etc) but that is only because it is time consuming to add the qualifiers to every statement. Push them on it and they'll clarify - or if they don't someone else will correct them.
 
Last edited:
Not an uncommon claim, I've even read it here @ ASR
All right. Not gonna ask for proof. It only takes one example and I believe you when you say you once came across one. :)

All DACs is really a lot of DACs though. Most sound the same statements I see here are about transparent DACs not necessarily all DACs.
 
This fr is clearly audible maybe not to some of these reviewers >80 years old .

I vote for BOM error :) the mfg has no QC wrong component somewhere.

If not in the design someone just put the wrong value in the machine that places them on the boards :) hence why QC is important.
 
It would be fine to drive a pair of analogue VU meters, to give an indication of the level of a digital signal.
 
Mine dates from 2012 and cost a fiver (UK money) back then. They have changed internally since although the case is similar. Mine just sounded a little 'dirty' at the very back of a mix, but no loss of top - this in the days when I trusted my ears more. Output was also very low but was judged great for older amps with high input sensitivity.
 
Thanks for this review.
Interesting.

The below plot shows results for 250, 1k, 6k and 16k Hz. The X-axis also indicates how the measured level differs at different frequencies.

1731520166925.png


Here is a THD+N in the frequency domain for a 0 dBFS input signal. Unusual behaviour of a curve that rises and then falls sharply.

1731528656247.png
About the 2 plots above:
It gives a false idea of distortion behaviour at high frequencies, since distortion is limited by the AP bandwidth you selected (unless you changed it for those measurements ?)

At 16kHz, for 22.4kHz BW, no harmonic can be measured, so that's just noise.
And above 7kHz, you don't see the 3rd harmonic either.

You should use a higher bandwidth for the AP to see actual distortion behaviour.
Amir uses 90kHz BW.
 
Here is a THD+N in the frequency domain for a 0 dBFS input signal. Unusual behaviour of a curve that rises and then falls sharply.
Is this related to the Freq. response of the DAC? What could explain the fall at 7kHz? (EDIT: answered by @Rja4000 above)
 
Back
Top Bottom