As the only brand I know of offering cardioid response down to 30 Hz, It is certainly interesting, and it seems to have an almost mystical reputation in its homeland.@q3cpma I am intrigued by the ME Geithain's RL901K; reading up on it. Looks great so far.
You've just outlined my future upgrade path.Not too bad, but clearly obsolete considering its price. Neumann's KH420 has all of these advantages without the inconvenients (lack of bass, more distortion, disappointing dispersion, NO OFFICIAL MEASUREMENTS), at half the price.
What's wrong with it? The soundandrecording.de measurements for the 8361A shows no weakness on that front; compared to Neumann's KH420, you get as much bass, 3-4 dB less headroom in the mids and 5-10 dB in the treble (not that important when you know the average musical spectrum).
Even more absurd if you consider the W371A too.
The midrange is impressive and the woofers aren't bad at all, when you inspect the aforementioned comparison with the KH420.
What? Genelec's build is one of its best points, with die cast alumiunium cabinets shaped exactly for sonic advantages (less diffraction, wholly integrated waveguide, greater internal/external volume, optimal bracing).
You mean the electronics? The 8351B dissassembly on this forum showed a good attention to detail, with Rubycon and WIMA caps on the board (a big Samwha too =|).
"Generic" is probably the wrong word, as you can certainly recognize them. "Bland", maybe?
See above, this is wrong.
Probably not as good. If I were to go passive for that budget, I'd take KEF's best stuff and a Purifi or Benchmark amp.
Have you considered the Kii three + BXT or GGNTKT M2 too? ME Geithain's RL901K should also interest you. Personally, for your budget, I wouldn't consider something without near-perfect measurements and at least one of these: coaxial layout and LF directivity control.
I used to be very vocal about publishing measurements too. I am not so sure anymore. Think about the (in)existing standards - one can publish good measurements in less than honest conditions, etc. I do appreciate companies that publish measurements - it is proof of good engineering, but I give a pass to companies that do not publish measurements yet their stuff performs when measured.It doesn't look bad, to be honest, but no measurements = no buy from me, even if were to win the lottery. Too much choice from actually expert and/or honest manufacturers like Genelec and Neumann to consider the alternative of "mystery performances".
Because even when it looks right (i.e. credible waveguide design/driver size/crossover frequencies), some stuff is hard to get right, like bass reflex.
The main advantages buy ATC, for me, is 1. The class AB “power pack” amps are exceedingly simple to work on and will always have stock replacement parts, even 25 or 30 years from now. You cannot say the same for hypex and icepower and ncore amp modules which will only exist as long as b&o is around.List updated! Thanks to q3cpma now ATC is #2 in the list. Blasphemy! I have to find a dealer to demo them.
That's a lot of words to say that you bought an image instead of a tool.The main advantages buy ATC, for me, is 1. The class AB “power pack” amps are exceedingly simple to work on and will always have stock replacement parts, even 25 or 30 years from now. You cannot say the same for hypex and icepower and ncore amp modules which will only exist as long as b&o is around.
the other and more important thing for me is true ability to customize the cabinet to any veneer you can possibly desire. Burr walnut with gorgeous matching patterned sworls, hand polished to a mirror finish. Or a piano floss black with several coats of laquer. Exotic woods of any kind... I know ATC isn’t the ONLY company offering this but they’re probably the best company offering it.
Lastly this is not a reason for the asr community, but it is important to me: brand and pride of ownership. I love owning something from a brand I like. Ilkness says it’s a cult... maybe it is. But it’s a cool cult to be in. Or at least, it feels like one. I do find it interesting that nobody bats an eye at Amir for owning an antiquated DAC that measures quite poor SINAD wise, and also owns amplifiers (Mark Levinson no. 53) Horrifically measuring amps. Yet he still owns them. Why? They’re gorgeous looking.
Will I be buying into a cult of personality speaker brand if I got my ATC scm150? You betcha. Will it be inferior to other, state of the art speakers? No doubt about it, yes. Will it look better? Hmm I’ll let you decide. Will a small minority of ASR members continue to smugly pat them selves on the back and armchair engineering? I guess so? Will the average forum goer on this website be able to make their intelligent and informed decisions? I hope so.
C'mon! ATC is a very good speaker + an image / a brand. He bought into both.That's a lot of words to say that you bought an image instead of a tool.
D&D's business also seems to be going very well. Visting the major pro audio forums, one reads lots of anecdotes about ATC users preferring the 8Cs or Kii Threes. One finds many fewer anecdotes about a preference for ATCs or other traditional monitors.I have the same concern in general but Dutch & Dutch are in many ways similar to ATC when it started up and their proprietor is still a young man whereas how long will it be before Billy Youngman retires and how may ATC change then?
I have the same concern in general but Dutch & Dutch are in many ways similar to ATC when it started up and their proprietor is still a young man whereas how long will it be before Billy Youngman retires and how may ATC change then?
I do love the look too, but "very good" doesn't apply to them, really.C'mon! ATC is a very good speaker + an image / a brand. He bought into both.
And to come out clean - I love the archaic / retro look of the "pro" ATC SCM150ASL. Man oh man - go figure![]()
Get a thicker skin, this is the interweb. I can and do make posts full of effort and short banters when I see fit. Usual audiophile talking points that don't belong on this website don't really bring out effort from me; conveniently ignoring off-axis goes into that category for me.I’m so sick of your shit q3cmpa. You’re a real character. You rarely do anything but make vaguely snide, smug and often times judgemental comments. It’s like you take extreme glee in pointing out your precious ge gelthians and your genelecs are SOOoo much better. And your comment about ATC not being tools is wrong. I’ve already fucking said in my post that the ATC are not state of the art. But they’re still good tools. They still have perfect channel matching and are +-2db for 98% of the spectrum. So nice try.
I apologize to everyone else for the foul language but this dude really gets under my skin not just in this thread but elsewhere as well. I always ignore it not not this time.
instead of constantly denigrating others be more respectful and put some effort into your posts.
That's a lot of words to say that you bought an image instead of a tool.
I do love the look too, but "very good" doesn't apply to them, really.
1) Non-linear distortion matters a lot less than linear, and on-axis isn't the prettiest (especially for the price, again). Off-axis isn't shown here.https://www.hifinews.com/content/atc-scm100se-loudspeaker-lab-report
THD 100Hz/1kHz/10kHz (for 90dB SPL/1m) 0.2% / <0.1% / 0.1%
That's as good as it gets. State of the art.
The SCM150ASL is back on the first position.