jamescarter1982
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2021
- Messages
- 217
- Likes
- 72
how wide is this thing ? if it was the standard width of a stereo component that would be so cool ?
I have only heard their XRT18's and myself and several others really liked them.....Seems like McIntosh gets everything right except speakers. They always look great too—any and every vintage I’ve seen.
how wide is this thing ? if it was the standard width of a stereo component that would be so cool ?
Something like that but probably more complicated than just a resistor to minimize the side effects of the voltage drop however low it is, and accuracy as well. The root of the issue, imo, is not so much about accuracy, but the real meaning of the indicated "watts" for real world applications when loudspeakers are used, not load resistors or inductors.Can't they just measure across a small in-line resistance to get the power accurately? Or am I missing something obvious?
real shame the full quoted price for a full width one would almost be worth itIt is for car audio, so unfortunately just 7 inches.
I recently saw one in the dash of a car that had a McIntosh amp in the trunk. It came from the Callaway factory that way in a:This is a review and measurements of the McIntosh MPM4000 Power/dB vintage stereo meter. It is on kind loan from a member and costs used from US $500 to $999.
View attachment 424110
It had come out in 1997, aimed at automotive market so requires 12 volt power. As you can see in this sample though, it can be readily used in home systems with a case and external power supply.
Unlike every other VU meter we have tested so far which are just for show, the MPM4000 is supposed to be calibrated for a 4 ohm speaker. The purpose of the review then is to see if there is an impact on the fidelity and accuracy of its markings.
FYI the sample I have has very dim lighting. I suspect the originals were brighter.
McIntosh MPM4000 Power Meter Measurements
For testing, I configured the Purifi reference amplifier for 1 watt output. Here it is by itself:
View attachment 424111
As we expect, distortion is vanishingly small. Let's now connect the MPM4000 in parallel to left (1) channel:
View attachment 424112
There is no impact whatsoever which is a relief.
Now let's test for accuracy. I measured the above on the meter and it was accurate, subject to optical error. I then jumped to 10 watts and it too was accurate:
View attachment 424113
I then went up to 100 watts and it too was accurate. So mission is accomplished!
Conclusions
We have had many discussions of vintage meters on power amps being accurate (or not) in the context of new versions which clearly are not. I did not know what to expect but was pleasantly surprised to see that not only is it transparent but that it is also accurately showing power output of the amplifier.
The only negative is the astronomical pricing of it. I guess half of that is for the "status" sake.
I am going to recommend the McIntosh MPM4000 power meter if you don't have to tap into kid's college education fund to buy it!
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
I'm guessing though that it is actually only responsive to voltage. So will show double the real power with an 8 ohm load.Of course.
You have sent in so much cool stuff over the years! It’s greatly appreciated. I also find it funny that we own(ed) so many of the same, or similar, „toys“ - I have that Luxman switch in passive (AS-55), there was the JBL UT405 / Baby Everest, and I happen to own a product similar to the one reviewed here - the Technics VU meter that I like to mention so much - sh 9020. It features both line level and a speaker (power) input, providing accurate readings. The latter is a one - way connection, so there isn’t even a possibility for the device to interact with the signal. I love this thing, it’s so versatile and cool. They need to start making equipment like that again.I sent this in to Amir.
It’s exactly that. Status symbol or more specifically, eye candy. It did help me understand exactly how many watts I was using when listening in my own setup. I previously had the MC2105 and MC2102 and the meters are a fun part of McIntosh products. It’s why the MC2100 just isn’t worth as much as the MC2105. When I sold off my McIntosh gear, and then Accuphase gear, I missed the “style” that the VU meters offered.
What we see with a lot of VU meters with labeled power output is just random numbers. It is nice to have accurate numbers if you are going to have numbers.
For speaker switching, I previously sent in three Luxman speaker selector.
Audio jewelry or “collectible” widgets like this:
![]()
75th Anniversary Limited Edition Ornament
A unique collectable for any McIntosh fan. Limited Edition - order yours before they are gone. Made in USA from fine pewter.shop.mcintoshlabs.com
…are just things for fun, not driven by technical rationale. For those that celebrate Christmas and celebrate it with a home decorated tree, why pick the specific ornaments that you pick? That’s the rationale for picking some of the audio gear we pick…
Vast majority of speakers have their minimum impedance around 4 ohm. So they are smart in targeting this value as it is likely close to be accurate with real speakers.EDIT : or some random multiple of actual power with any real speaker, due to the impedance characteristic.
Sounds nice and sharp with my glasses on. Without, it blurs the details....Looks nice, but how does it sound?
I've been intending to buy one of these for some time, so thanks for testing this as great to see no impact on signal.McIntosh MPM4000
Yep, know of these... cheaper than the Mac, but not much less in most 2nd hand cases and also hard to find, various conditions etc.
bundles of them , you can make them into an atmos array to make your atmos home theatre great againYep, know of these... cheaper than the Mac, but not much less in most 2nd hand cases and also hard to find, various conditions etc.
I really don't see why a company can't make a proper power meter like these, even incorporated into a nice integrated (for a reasonable price), properly referenced to 4/8 Ohm.
JSmith
Sounds like you need something to "lift the veil"!!Sounds nice and sharp with my glasses on. Without, it blurs the details....
I really don't see why a company can't make a proper power meter like these, even incorporated into a nice integrated (for a reasonable price), properly referenced to 4/8 Ohm.
Even easier,this one and some code:I find it facinating how the electical motor power engeeneers has solved the current measurment problem in a cheap and accurate way for motor control.
Warning: reading this and your head might start to spinn: https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/tiducy7/tiducy7.pdf?ts=1738066318483