@MatrixAudio , should the first X-SABRE Pro (non-MQA) measure the same?
Is there any difference between them besides the new USB interface and MQA support?
Is there any difference between them besides the new USB interface and MQA support?
apx has a new model of apx555
Hey, NO! I'm an authorized dealer too (www.nice-cans.com)! Matrix is establishing their dealer network in the US, and some of us are pretty new.A quick question for @MatrixAudio: Can you please confirm that Power Holdings Inc. storefront on Amazon.com is your official vendor? Thank you.
Hi citraian@MatrixAudio , should the first X-SABRE Pro (non-MQA) measure the same?
Is there any difference between them besides the new USB interface and MQA support?
Okto is number one in this specific measurement I would say, no? -140dB, divide by six thats 23.3 bits of resolution. Thinking about that rationally, all four devices show measurements far exceeding the human audible threshold lol. I would not worry.Number one - Matrix Element, Number two - Sabaj D5, Number three - Okto DAC8, Number four - Matrix X Sabre Pro MQA
Hahaha,Aestheticaly I am not too impressed. There is still nothng to beat Dieter Rams' audio designs for Braun, decades ago.
Okto is number one in this specific measurement I would say, no? -140dB, divide by six thats 23.3 bits of resolution. Thinking about that rationally, all four devices show measurements far exceeding the human audible threshold lol. I would not worry.
By my logic, I think so. Very few amps even have a noise floor that equals this dac. So, if the measurements are any indication, the dac will almost certainly be outperforming your amp. Or rather, you’d be bottlenecking your dac. But from my personal research, it seems like -114db noisefloor is the absolute limit of human hearing. All this being said, I don’t think there’s anything wrong purchasing this dac. It has many input options, including aes digital and USB. It’s solid, well made. And the performance is state of the art.Would connecting this to a $99 headphone amp be overkill?
My understanding is that Power Holdings is transitioning to a role as distributor instead of dealer like me, but I could be wrong, and I encourage Power Holdings to chime in and clarify this.A quick question for @MatrixAudio: Can you please confirm that Power Holdings Inc. storefront on Amazon.com is your official vendor? Thank you.
By my logic, I think so. Very few amps even have a noise floor that equals this dac. So, if the measurements are any indication, the dac will almost certainly be outperforming your amp. Or rather, you’d be bottlenecking your dac. But from my personal research, it seems like -114db noisefloor is the absolute limit of human hearing. All this being said, I don’t think there’s anything wrong purchasing this dac. It has many input options, including aes digital and USB. It’s solid, well made. And the performance is state of the art.
Anyway. What $99 amp are you using? I use a very inexpensive amp myself, I wrote a little bit about it Here.
I haven’t made up my mind just yet but I am probably going to replace my Schiit Dungnir multibit with the Matrix. God Bless Amir for measuring so many dacs.
Number one - Matrix Element, Number two - Sabaj D5, Number three - Okto DAC8, Number four - Matrix X Sabre Pro MQA
If you don't need any other analog inputs, I would go directly to the power amp with it.I'm wondering if preamp is required for this dac which has 18dB gain control.
Some people insist that preamp makes better sound.
yes.Would connecting this to a $99 headphone amp be overkill?