• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Matrix Audio X-SABRE Pro MQA: Best Audio DAC in the World?

citraian

New Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2019
Messages
4
Likes
2
@MatrixAudio , should the first X-SABRE Pro (non-MQA) measure the same?
Is there any difference between them besides the new USB interface and MQA support?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zog

SIY

Grand Contributor
Technical Expert
Joined
Apr 6, 2018
Messages
10,480
Likes
25,225
Location
Alfred, NY
apx has a new model of apx555

AFAIK, he isn't using the latest B series. So indeed, this DAC is running at or close to the 555's measurement capability, and definitely exceeding that of the 525 I use. It might be interesting to incorporate data from the 555 in loopback as part of the graphs when the performance gets this good.
 

MatrixAudio

Active Member
Audio Company
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
215
Likes
428
Location
Xi'an China
@MatrixAudio , should the first X-SABRE Pro (non-MQA) measure the same?
Is there any difference between them besides the new USB interface and MQA support?
Hi citraian
The measurements would almost the same.
Besides the different USB interface chip, the firmware of XMOS is totally different as well.
Thank you.
 

777

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
486
Likes
360
Number one - Matrix Element, Number two - Sabaj D5, Number three - Okto DAC8, Number four - Matrix X Sabre Pro MQA
 

Attachments

  • Matrix Audio Element X streaming DAC Multitone Audio Measurements.png
    Matrix Audio Element X streaming DAC Multitone Audio Measurements.png
    35.9 KB · Views: 595
  • Sabaj D5 DAC and Headphone Amplifier Multitone Audio Measurements.png
    Sabaj D5 DAC and Headphone Amplifier Multitone Audio Measurements.png
    30.4 KB · Views: 525
  • Okto Research DAC8 Pro USB 8 Channel DAC Multitone Audio Measurements.png
    Okto Research DAC8 Pro USB 8 Channel DAC Multitone Audio Measurements.png
    31.3 KB · Views: 515
  • Matrix Audio X-Sabre Pro MQA DAC Multitone Audio measurements.png
    Matrix Audio X-Sabre Pro MQA DAC Multitone Audio measurements.png
    30.3 KB · Views: 567

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,597
Likes
12,039
Number one - Matrix Element, Number two - Sabaj D5, Number three - Okto DAC8, Number four - Matrix X Sabre Pro MQA
Okto is number one in this specific measurement I would say, no? -140dB, divide by six thats 23.3 bits of resolution. Thinking about that rationally, all four devices show measurements far exceeding the human audible threshold lol. I would not worry.
 

BostonJack

Active Member
Editor
Joined
Jul 2, 2019
Messages
288
Likes
350
Location
Boston area, Cambridge, MA
Aestheticaly I am not too impressed. There is still nothng to beat Dieter Rams' audio designs for Braun, decades ago.
Hahaha,
Saw a couple of those in a Design exhibit at MOMA, New York city late this winter.
really beautiful treatment of simple elements: text, aluminum sheets, switches.
It would be really cool to emulate Rams' design sense on any DIY project (if you have the chops).
 

Rene

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2018
Messages
90
Likes
87
Hi Amir,

Which filter was used for the two-tone measurement; certainly not the default or any of the MQA filters.

And what was the sample rate used? The Total Dac appears to have been done at 48kHz.

Thanks,
Rene'



Since some of you are in love with intermodulation tests of all sorts, here is the test of 19 and 20 kHz tones:

View attachment 32221

For grins, I left in there the TotalDAC d1-six dac measurements in red. You rather have your soup with a bunch of flies in it or bug-free?


Here is the response of the different reconstruction filters with #2 being the default:

View attachment 32224

I would probably go with filter 3.
 

777

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
486
Likes
360
Okto is number one in this specific measurement I would say, no? -140dB, divide by six thats 23.3 bits of resolution. Thinking about that rationally, all four devices show measurements far exceeding the human audible threshold lol. I would not worry.

No :) -140dB but start from -20dB, so, we have -120dB in reality.
 

direstraitsfan98

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
826
Likes
1,226
Would connecting this to a $99 headphone amp be overkill?
By my logic, I think so. Very few amps even have a noise floor that equals this dac. So, if the measurements are any indication, the dac will almost certainly be outperforming your amp. Or rather, you’d be bottlenecking your dac. But from my personal research, it seems like -114db noisefloor is the absolute limit of human hearing. All this being said, I don’t think there’s anything wrong purchasing this dac. It has many input options, including aes digital and USB. It’s solid, well made. And the performance is state of the art.

Anyway. What $99 amp are you using? I use a very inexpensive amp myself, I wrote a little bit about it Here.

I haven’t made up my mind just yet but I am probably going to replace my Schiit Dungnir multibit with the Matrix. God Bless Amir for measuring so many dacs.
 

suttondesign

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
733
Likes
1,311
Location
Bellingham, WA
A quick question for @MatrixAudio: Can you please confirm that Power Holdings Inc. storefront on Amazon.com is your official vendor? Thank you.
My understanding is that Power Holdings is transitioning to a role as distributor instead of dealer like me, but I could be wrong, and I encourage Power Holdings to chime in and clarify this.
 

AndrewDavis

Active Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2019
Messages
220
Likes
431
By my logic, I think so. Very few amps even have a noise floor that equals this dac. So, if the measurements are any indication, the dac will almost certainly be outperforming your amp. Or rather, you’d be bottlenecking your dac. But from my personal research, it seems like -114db noisefloor is the absolute limit of human hearing. All this being said, I don’t think there’s anything wrong purchasing this dac. It has many input options, including aes digital and USB. It’s solid, well made. And the performance is state of the art.

Anyway. What $99 amp are you using? I use a very inexpensive amp myself, I wrote a little bit about it Here.

I haven’t made up my mind just yet but I am probably going to replace my Schiit Dungnir multibit with the Matrix. God Bless Amir for measuring so many dacs.

The JDS Atom, but I was being partly facetious (thank you for taking me seriously). It is a really interesting subject, though. If an amp is "provably audibly transparent", but the DAC is even more transparent, is there really a bottleneck?
 

Silvera

Member
Joined
May 23, 2019
Messages
24
Likes
5
This would make a very nice pair with the HPA4 ...if you have deep pockets.
 

HLee

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Messages
25
Likes
9
I'm wondering if preamp is required for this dac which has 18dB gain control.
Some people insist that preamp makes better sound.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,595
Likes
239,589
Location
Seattle Area
I'm wondering if preamp is required for this dac which has 18dB gain control.
Some people insist that preamp makes better sound.
If you don't need any other analog inputs, I would go directly to the power amp with it.
 
Top Bottom