Thats the correct way (vertical) specific for Mathaudio to do a measurement.Regarding measurement: It’s quite a while since I did them, and I believe the mic was vertical. But I have to redo them anyway, since I replaced my amplifier recently.
By the way: Your screenshots make me wonder, whether my MathAudio version is the latest one (as I don’t have that »In/Out« button). I won’t even know how to verify
Besides: My left channel window names the calibration file I was using for my measurements.
View attachment 229316ts an old version i th
Let me give you an example why it's position is important to me (subjectively)
Yes for me the strait white line is maximum transparency if i put it on -10 db bass lacks an mid high frequency are starting to dominate.So your chosen reference frequency line is a straight one. I understand that.
But I still don’t fully understand why you placed it at -15 dB (and not at -10 dB or even -5 dB). Except that your decision was based on that good old »I simply let my ears do the judgement« ...
The position shows the amount of attenuation that's applied in frequencies.OK, I understand that. But then why is also its position that important?
You can use REW for that,using the "from file" measurement which you can play through foobar.I sure would just love a MathAudio feature that allows redoing the measurement of a given system that is actually corrected by MathAudio Room EQ.
The higher you keep the target line, the less MathAudio RoomEQ will actually do. It does not EQ anything below the target line. It only EQs what's above the line.So your chosen reference frequency line is a straight one. I understand that.
But I still don’t fully understand why you placed it at -15 dB (and not at -10 dB or even -5 dB). Except that your decision was based on that good old »I simply let my ears do the judgement« ...
Easy as opening a beer can, I’d guess ... Will give it a try later.You can use REW for that,using the "from file" measurement which you can play through foobar.
Thanks a big lot! That seems to be the same than what Sokel posted some hours ago, but now I start to get the picture ...The higher you keep the target line, the less MathAudio RoomEQ will actually do. It does not EQ anything below the target line. It only EQs what's above the line.
I'm using the new Adam A7v monitors that came out recently. Correction is possible within the monitors via dsp, however there are some delays on the software being released so I haven't been able to try it yet. I'm currently using REW and using a parametric EQ in the mean time. I'm trying to limit myself to 6 eq bands, as that's what the Adam software will have once available. I figure I can then use the same settings. I've been having some mixed results with REW's suggested eq adjustments and have found that I'm getting some pretty good results by doing it manually and watching how the predicted curve responds to changes. I'm just making cuts and only up to 400hz.Wondering what type/brand speakers are you using and how many filters (measurements) did you made.
At least that looks a like a right measurement.Redid the measurements today. Found no way to do it via Audirvana, which is way I was using foobar for it.
Which is why I’m not fully trusting the results by now Quite surprisingly I have to apply a 16% left balance correction to center the »sound stage« for the listener.
View attachment 229551
Maybe only 7 or 8. Out of respect for my neighbors, and for my wifeHow many did you do around your listening spot?
They don't have to be loud,75db is the usual level but that's up to you.Maybe only 7 or 8. Out of respect for my neighbors, and for my wife