• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Mathaudio Room EQ users (tips & tricks)

If only one sampling rate at a time is allowed,I would stick to the original,more common 44.1Khz,or whatever the file is.
You won't find a difference in quality going higher.
Ok i manage to install wasapi event an push. Unfortunately it does not work. Atleast you can choose at some setting for 16, 24 or 32bit. But those settings will not work.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240522_113822.jpg
    IMG_20240522_113822.jpg
    462.7 KB · Views: 61
Last edited:
What is the best way to locate the microphone for Room EQ out of the following patterns? The Room EQ instructions just show a matrix of dots. Is there a best practice?:
Measurement Locations.jpeg
Measurement Locations.png
 
What is the best way to locate the microphone for Room EQ out of the following patterns? The Room EQ instructions just show a matrix of dots. Is there a best practice?:View attachment 389733View attachment 389735
If you refer to this topic Mathaudio Room EQ users (tips & tricks) read Mathaudio setup manuel on their website. Always place the mic vertical on ear hight because their algo is developed like that. I guess the sofa setup. Because of the multiple speakers setup you can ask Sergey from Mathaudio E-mail => [email protected] https://mathaudio.com/room-eq.htm

Also a nice Mathaudio forum to find answers

Screenshot_2024-09-01-03-48-18-277-edit_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg
 
Last edited:
I am wondering if anyone has tried to adjust the white target line to the shape of the Harman Curve? Isn't the Harman curve a theoretical target sound signature said to produce the best sound quality that most listeners would prefer? So this is what I am experimenting. See the graph below:

harman.png


I can't say if this produces the sound I like. It sure sounds different from the flat line. I would like hear your opinions.
 
Yes, I just realized I used the wrong Harman Curve. Thanks for pointing it out. No wonder it sounded so thin. :D Now I have adjusted it toward The loudspeaker room Harman, and it sounds awesome.
roomharman.png
 
If you refer to this topic Mathaudio Room EQ users (tips & tricks) read Mathaudio setup manuel on their website. Always place the mic vertical on ear hight because their algo is developed like that. I guess the sofa setup. Because of the multiple speakers setup you can ask Sergey from Mathaudio E-mail => [email protected] https://mathaudio.com/room-eq.htm

Also a nice Mathaudio forum to find answers

View attachment 389741
By "place the mic vertical", do you mean pointing the mic toward the ceiling?
 
By "place the mic vertical", do you mean pointing the mic toward the ceiling?
Yes specific the Mathaudio algorithm expected it is. Important part is measuring reflection from the ceiling better.
 
Wow, I have been doing it all wrong by pointing forward. :facepalm::facepalm:
If you're using a UMIK-1 make sure you use the vertical calibration file (XXXXXXX_90deg.txt)
 
Does anyone have REW (or so) measurements before and after using Mathaudio Room EQ? The example in #69 doesn't look very impressive. It would be interesting to see the waterfall and so on..
 
Does anyone have REW (or so) measurements before and after using Mathaudio Room EQ? The example in #69 doesn't look very impressive. It would be interesting to see the waterfall and so on..
Quick and dirty,I suppose that the general climate asks for something as wrong as full spectrum correction?
There you go,mic about a meter away to see the effect:



Math.PNG


I'm in the middle of electric measurements now,another day I maybe post more.
 
MQuick and dirty,I suppose that the general climate asks for something as wrong as full spectrum correction?
There you go,mic about a meter away to see the effect:



View attachment 399348

I'm in the middle of electric measurements now,another day I maybe post more.
I suppose red is the correction.?
 
Apologies if this is stating the obvious but I guess the first question would be: has anything changed since you measured for RoomEQ, furniture, distances etc?
My UMIK-1 is out on loan currently, so can't check myself unfortunately.
 
Last edited:
Sure. I wonder what changed in the time domain.
Don't mind the values as the interface is set for electrical response and noise is high at mic,look at the relative:


time.PNG



Where it matters (lows) it works,and it works well.

And here's the absolute guide about correction (along with the book of course) :

 
Back
Top Bottom