I spent a lot of time measuring, testing, and reading all I could about the various time delay estimation options in REW. The phase match, phase slope match, and IR match, and others including wavelets. All gave different results. I don't see any way of knowing if there is one best answer. Sometimes it agreed with WiiM, sometimes not. But then it also doesn't agree with itself, so there's something to consider. When there was ambiguity, my conclusion was to discard the big delay numbers (i.e., 30-52ms) and keep the small ones (3-6ms range). Also, fine tuning by ear helps confirm the selection.
I love REW, and all the amazing analysis it can do. However, when all was said and done, the WiiM Ultra made as good or better set of PEQ filters to integrate my sub. I used REW to measure and confirm the results. I don't think there is anything wrong with REW, and if you are a tech geek like myself having all this science at your fingertips is really part of the fun. It's just that the WiiM makes it so much easier to get it right the first time with very little effort.
It could be my impression of REW was slightly soured by the need to manually type in 30 numbers for each EQ session. Is there any easier way?
It's nice to have both.