Mort
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2024
- Messages
- 1,149
- Likes
- 1,721
I do not. No reason to.
-
Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Master Thread: Are Measurements Everything or Nothing?
- Thread starter amirm
- Start date
solderdude
Grand Contributor
Can you educate me how much crosstalk is required to be audible ?
How much 'panning' is there in recordings ? Are recordings made like the early Beatles records ?
How much crosstalk is there between 2 speakers standing a few meters apart ?
When you have 80dB in your left ear and just 40dB in your right ear do you think you can hear it if this were 20dB instead of 40dB ? Have you tried this ?
As with everything it also depends on sensitivity of speakers ?
With 80-100 do you mean -80dB or -100dB noise levels and opposite which level ?
Did you mean 80-100 SINAD and opposite which level ?
If it is SINAD then what component is distortion and what harmonic profile ?
Did we ever state ALL amps and DACs sound the same or merely all decent measuring systems under equal circumstances and below clipping levels.
Mort
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2024
- Messages
- 1,149
- Likes
- 1,721
There are bad amps that sound different sure. That's not a particularly impressive amp and some might tell the difference although it'll still be hard.
Good amps sound the same because they exceed our hearing ability.
solderdude
Grand Contributor
This is what Amir said about this product:
Does that strike you as a well measuring device ?
Of course one can find products that lack here and there. That is why Amir tests all kinds of gear.
With music, probably inaudible.
It's piss-poor though. Not many amps are that bad. You won't see that with a Sony or Yamaha or even a Sanyo.
What I pick up on the threads is that ALL amps sound the same no matter what, not by you personally, but that would strike me as odd or not as perceive it. Some have a dac inside, some are avr's and some are just power amps. I get that with decent measured amps the difference is neglectable and therefore ASR measures the stuff, right? And so because of that I picked up a hypex amp that some peeps adament let me believe it should not differ from any other amp allthough it measures better on any front to it's predecessor. And yes, one gets better results for it. But writing that last sentence it flares all kind of red neck stains to some which I don't get.
solderdude
Grand Contributor
Not all amps sound the same.
All competently designed and 'transparent' measuring amps sound the same when not driven outside of their capabilities and with 'non-extreme' loads.
There are plenty that sound different and these measure very different as well.
Of course when one has difficult loads, replaces an amp with one that can deliver much more power and is played louder than the previous one could or replaces a 'poor measuring' one with a much better one chances are you will hear a difference that might not be imagined.
Failure to do an 'ears only' listening comparison and failure to level match probably accounts for 95 percent of reported amp differences, varying performance into reactive loads probably covers the rest. Assuming the amps in question are not measurement disasters.
95% of all reported differences.
Keith
Keith
All this has been said before, many times:
Amir says he can detect distortions down to nearly -120 dB, and I believe him. He received special training. But I seem to recall his description of how he did it: He gain-rides the system during the quiet bits.
I've heard this myself. I was listening to the quiet part of a recording of Yes's Close to the Edge. In the recording, the music starts with a natural-sound sample, which fades in from nothing. Right just as it is fading in when the signal is probably at -90 dB, cranking it WAY up at that point to bring it to full scale will reveal all sorts of distortions and artifacts. But one must crank it back down immediately, because when the signal grows, it will quickly blow up the speakers at amplification levels that high. I think Amir talked of listening in the tails of reverberation as the sound was dying away. With the volume set for the music, these noises and distortions will be well below the ambient noise level in the space.
And as for harmonic distortion, I can't detect it at all, even in accurate headphones at elevated levels, when it is worse than about 1%, -40 dB. For me, an amp with harmonic distortion at -70 or -80 dB will be crystal clear, and I would bet that every amp made today for use in a proper sound system achieves that threshold. Non-harmonic distortion is easier to hear, but again I don't know of any studies at normal listening levels (that is, without gain-riding and other special techniques) where any distortion lower than -80 dB can be detected.
So, an amp that measures at -120 dB reflects engineering prowess but it has no practical value beyond that. I would challenge anyone to show me they can hear the difference between, say, my Buckeye Hypex NC502MP amp (SINAD around -100 dB) and a similarly powered amp of any design, when played at normal (LOUD!) listening levels using real speakers. And especially using real speakers, which probably have distortion levels orders of magnitude higher than the amp.
But I bet there are a lot of amps out there that when played into typically inefficient speakers are overdriven on the sharpest peaks of dynamic music. Let's say my loudspeakers are able to produce 85 dB SPL at one meter when driven by 1 watt of power (at whatever impedance--let's say 8 ohms). If I play dynamic music that averages 90 dB SPL, which will sound reasonably loud, it may have peaks of 105 dB very easily. Those peaks will only need a little over 30 watts driving one speaker at a meter away. That crappy SMSL amp might be acceptable for that application--speakers very close to the listener and listening levels moderated. But we need to add 6 dB if we are at 2 meters, though we can subtract 3 if we are listening in stereo. That net 3 dB gain doubles the power requirement to about 65 watts.
But if we want to play the same music at 100 dB average, we'll need amps that can deliver the power needed to drive peaks at 118 dB SPL. 100 dB on average is very loud, but I daresay not beyond what many audio enthusiasts expect from their systems. Those peaks will require (118 - 85 =) 33 dB of gain to play those peaks without clipping. That will demand 2000 watts. Very few people have that much power available. So, we move to more efficient speakers. Mine produce 90 dB with that 1 watt of input, and that helps. But those peaks will still require 630 watts. Into these 6-ohm speakers, my amp can produce maybe 400 watts at 1% distortion. At 8 ohms, it's 330, and at 4 ohms, it goes into protection at less than 1% distortion, but is supplying over 500 watts when doing so. These are per-channel outputs and I'm driving two speakers, we can effectively double these outputs. So, this amp is barely large enough to play this scenario's loud, dynamic music into these 90-dB, 6-ohm speakers without clipping. I know this is true, because if I play dynamically recorded percussion instruments, I can make the clipping indicators flash without the sound being intolerably loud by any means. This is an amp rated at 350 wpc into 8 ohms--impossibly large by the standards of a few decades ago.
Again, we grossly underestimate required power if we intend to play dynamic music (or soundtracks) at high levels.
When the amp can't produce enough power to fill out the waveforms in those peaks, it suffers, and this is where amps differ quite a lot. Some will just cut off the peak with a hard clip and flat-spot the wave form with sharp corners. That produces a whole range of spurious frequencies that will measure well over 1% distortion. If the clipping noise (which may sound like a loud click) is as loud as the music being clipped, the distortion is 100%. I've heard it. But if it's percussion being clipped like that, we may not particularly notice, because the click might sound a bit like the instrument.
The amp may have gentler ways of responding to the clipping. It may be much smoother than a hard clip, which may produce noise/distortion byproducts that are much less objectionable. It may even simply compress the peaks so that they don't change the sound much but do compress the dynamics. Or, it may have enough reserve power to fill out the waveform for a few milliseconds, which might be enough for that percussion instrument, but maybe not for the sound of the imperial starcruiser passing overhead. When playing real music, those different behaviors might well make audible differences.
I think this happens a lot more often during amp testing than people realize, and may well account for those observations of differences that are real. (Recognizing that most aren't.) Almost anybody asked to audition an amp is going to really crank it up at least part of the time, because the whole purpose of an amp is to make the music loud.
But audiophiles are often into their tiny tube amps that may put out 15 or 20 or 50 watts. For driving desktop speakers that are a meter away to play moderately loud music they may be fine. But for a larger system in a larger room playing music or sound effects at realistic levels, no way. So, instead of getting a more powerful amp, the audiophile get more efficient speakers, like horn-loaded compression drivers, which add orders of magnitude more distortion on their own.
The usual claim that all amps sound the same include this unrealistic qualifier: "when driven within their limits." It's my view that these limits may be the proximate cause of amps sounding different (when they do sound different) in typical audition scenarios, which include cranking them up to full power.
The good news is that inexpensive, clean power is readily available these days.
On the crosstalk issue, do we doubt that crosstalk less than about -25 or -30 dB is inaudible?
Rick "clipping performance is rarely measured, but it is easily measured" Denney
Last edited:
MattHooper
Grand Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
- Messages
- 10,292
- Likes
- 17,772
Hi Audionaut,
Just bumping this for a moment because I happen to be revisiting my old review of the Shun Mook speakers and noticed that yes, they used the Dynaudio drivers.
I’m not a DIY guy so I’m curious : when you say, these were sold as a kit, what does that mean exactly? Is it just the drivers? And then the builder makes whatever cabinet he wants? Or was there a cabinet sold with it or perhaps the design of a cabinet suggested?
Thanks.
MAB
Major Contributor
There were many Dynaudio DIY publications, like this design.
This is a 6dB/octave design, which is common with many Dynaudio builds. The drivers could certainly be used with other crossover slopes.
Audionaut
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2025
- Messages
- 939
- Likes
- 3,801
Hi Matt,
that was all a while ago. If I remember correctly, it was the case that you could buy just the individual drivers if required, or a ready-made kit including the matching crossover.
It was the job of the self-builder to make the right cabinets.
MAB
Major Contributor
Yeah, they had a dedicated program to promote DIY designs with their drivers. Here is a link to a copy of their catalog of projects:
They have crossover schematics, dimensions, everything needed to build the speakers.
thewas
Master Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2020
- Messages
- 8,217
- Likes
- 23,041
Electrical 6 dB/octave which was possible as the drivers have suitable and similar ones, the total acoustic slope which counts for the filter characteristic is usually higher so it was a bit of a misunderstood myth.
Such a shallow slope has also significant disadvantages on the vertical radiation unless a coincident design is used.
MAB
Major Contributor
Thanks for the good point on the actual performance of an electrical 6dB/oct crossover in real life. One of the benefits of DIY and measurements is we get to see that these fanciful concepts, like so-called 6dB per octave implementations, actually perform much different in real-world applications. And as Fink points out, these ideas often have significant tradeoffs that need to be managed.
MattHooper
Grand Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
- Messages
- 10,292
- Likes
- 17,772
Thanks for the replies, everybody!
It makes me curious just how much design the Shun Mook characters put into the speaker. I don’t have reason to tell them that - given some of their beliefs - they “ chose, would based on how they believed it sounded” and also did their own type of funky bracing strategy inside.
So for somebody using these drivers or kit the 6db slope be used for sure or is there some wiggle room for different crossover schemes?
Whatever the case may be, those speakers were still among the most coherent I’ve ever heard.
Audionaut
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2025
- Messages
- 939
- Likes
- 3,801
Yes, there are an infinite number of possible variations
Similar threads
