• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Master Thread: Are measurements Everything or Nothing?

Only with an oscilloscope. I don't have any Audio precision gear. You realize DFT and FFT are used in all kinds of ways. They're used in economics and finance too.
Since my first job after my post-doc was working for the Chief Scientist at Nicolet in the 1980s, and I teach a course in its use for seniors and grad students, I have a fair familiarity.

Fourier Transforms are the backbone of EVERY audio analysis package, including REW, ARTA, Virtins MI, you name it. The idea that it's exotic or only rarely used is a perfect demonstration of not having the faintest clue about audio measurement.
 
Since my first job after my post-doc was working for the Chief Scientist at Nicolet in the 1980s, and I teach a course in its use for seniors and grad students, I have a fair familiarity.

Fourier Transforms are the backbone of EVERY audio analysis package, including REW, ARTA, Virtins MI, you name it. The idea that it's exotic or only rarely used is a perfect demonstration of not having the faintest clue about audio measurement.
The point I was making is that they are used literally everywhere, not just in audio. They are used in every discipline of engineering, finance and economics. It was very late for me when I made that post so if I implied something incorrectly, my apologies. I can't even remember the post.
Why are you being so pointy? You know nothing about me.
 
I can't remember exactly what I said.
I'll remind you since you also can't use basic forum features.

That is cool. Fourier transform is just stupid useful. You can pretty much use it for analysis of anything with a wave or a number array. I'm surprised it is not used in audio more often. Maybe it is used a lot in the design phase of huge companies like Harmon. I had an engineer buddy that worked for Raytheon and even though there were other mathematical ways to solve things they always used FFT "just because" if it was at all possible.
 
VTV is great because it had a combination of history and measurements, so it wasn’t just hand waving
Now that evokes an old audio memory.

Charlie Kittleson of Vacuum Tube Valley bought my Klipsch Forte II's when I downsized in 2005 and moved from a house to an apartment.

I drove the 70 miles north to Clear Lake (Lakeport) to deliver the speakers. When I got to his office, and he and a friend were excitedly sorting through boxes of NOS tubes that the friend had scored from a long-ago closed TV-Radio repair shop in a small town somewhere in the Western U.S.

Charlie's VTV magazines are definitely interesting if you are into tube audio. All 20 issues are available free for download as pdf from at least a couple of websites.
 
I'll remind you since you also can't use basic forum features.
Thank you Mr. Salty for offering your expertise, I appreciate it. Total brain disconnect on my part regarding FFT, I was thinking something else. I'm getting in this habit of thinking ahead of my writing and either transposing things or just leaving words out. I used to never do that. Oh well, I used to never lose things and now I do all the time. My brain just doesn't work near as well as it used to.

I provided a link up above for Vacuum Tube Valley issues 1-20 if you're interested.
 
Last edited:
Thank you Mr. Salty for offering your expertise, I appreciate it. Total brain disconnect on my part regarding FFT, I was thinking something else. I'm getting in this habit of thinking ahead of my writing and either transposing things or just leaving words out. I used to never do that. Oh well, I used to never lose things and now I do all the time. My brain just doesn't work near as well as it used to.

I provided a link up above for Vacuum Tube Valley issues 1-20 if you're interested.
That's DR. Salty. :D
 
I just got Sinxer SA-1 balanced headphone amplifier, used. Just because why not.

It's quite a beast, heavy and imposing. And boy it packs a punch. My DCA Aeons gained more forceful bass, there's more detail and air. If I had wife she would have heard the change, from the kitchen, with water running...

...and tomorrow I'm going to test it against humble Topping and find it does not actually have these extra features. It's always sobering to notice one is not immune to the biases even if you know they exist. :)
 
Last edited:
If I had wife she would have heard the change, from the kitchen, with water running...
My wife hears the difference from her office half a mile away. She has Chord-level hearing.
 
That's the best definition of this hobby there's. As long as you don't try to prove it to others with your anecdotal evidence. Enjoy music!
Measurements only capture parts of the music. There are attributes within the music below 20Khz that contribute to good sound between one DAC and another (e.g., realism, 3D, details, tight bass, tonality, attack/power, fullness/thinness, decay). Just because one Dac can go higher Gigahertz than another doesn't mean that it sounds better.
 
Last edited:
Measurements only capture parts of the music.
It's not music though is it? Until it reaches the drive unit on the speaker it's electrical current. After that it's air molecules moving about.

It only becomes music when it reaches the brain and the pattern is recognised as such.

There's nothing in the electrical current that can't be quantified, what the DAC does with it is entirely predictable.

Think about it that way and it makes it a lot clearer as to why there's no hidden secret to audio electronics.
 
I'm happy to hear you're enjoying your setup! I am curious about your use of the iPhone like this. That would drive me bananas. You may be well served by getting a dedicated streamer to use with your Ares II.

Au contraire mon frère, I think that the iPhone 12 Pro Max with its 6.7in screen, high resolution screen is better than standalone streamers with their remotes that generally don't even have a display. The iphone's big screen shows me the song lyrics that I can karaoke to.

The Apple Music app shows the album art cover, lets me browse the genere, album, artist, makes suggestions for new songs.

I've also read that battery powered devices have less noise than a/c electrical outlets that feed standalone streamers.

Reasonably priced (under $600 USD) standalone streamers that can play Apple Music use Apple Airplay2 via wireless streaming which can only decode Apple Music normal lossless, not Apple Music hi-res lossless. Airplay2 would just be mirroring my iPhone so the standalone streamer would be a waste. There are european streamers (Magna Hifi Mano Music Streamer) that have an i2S port and can play Apple Music format ALAC natively instead of using Airplay2 but they cost $1300 + shipping cost to the US.

Not to mention that with the money I saved from not buying a standalone streamer, I used that money to upgrade my Arcam AVR5 to the Parasound 2250 V.2 amplifier.

In the future I might add the Denafrips Iris which is a DDC to cleanup the digital source before going into the DAC and I'll be able to use the i2S port:
 
Last edited:
I can tell which denomination coin was dropped on the floor. Not even difficult for most here... hopefully. Maybe a fair test would be to see how many different coins you could hear at once.
 
Last edited:
I can tell which denomination coin was dropped on the floor. Not even difficult for most here... hopefully. Maybe a fair test would be to see how many different coins you could hear at once.

My wife doesn't care about the denomination of coins as long as she can spend it.
 
Measurements only capture parts of the music. There are attributes within the music below 20Khz that contribute to good sound between one DAC and another (e.g., realism, 3D, details, tight bass, tonality, attack/power, fullness/thinness, decay). Just because one Dac can go higher Gigahertz than another doesn't mean that it sounds better.
e.g., realism, 3D, details, tight bass, tonality, attack/power, fullness/thinness, decay - just your feelings. None of that is relevant to audio quality.
Well maybe decay does, but it's not part a dac anyway.
 
Au contraire mon frère, I think that the iPhone 12 Pro Max with its 6.7in screen, high resolution screen is better than standalone streamers with their remotes that generally don't even have a display. The iphone's big screen shows me the song lyrics that I can karaoke to.
My streamer is just a PC I built with USB out to the DAC running Roon as an endpoint. I use my phone or laptop to do all the same things you describe. My comment was more that I would not want to have my phone tethered to my hi-fi to listen, that is what seems bananas to me.

If it works for you, cheers mate!
 
My streamer is just a PC I built with USB out to the DAC running Roon as an endpoint. I use my phone or laptop to do all the same things you describe. My comment was more that I would not want to have my phone tethered to my hi-fi to listen, that is what seems bananas to me.

If it works for you, cheers mate!
My system is really a home theater (7.2.4 setup with 150in screen) with the equipments located a foot behind my couch in a 6' bookcase with the projector on top, and I'm really listening/paying attention to the music's sound quality and not walking around the room so I don't mind being tethered by the USB cable.

If the music were just playing in the background (I don't care about sound quality as much), then I would want wireless to move freely around the room/house; for that I use the 7 Denon Heos (with builtin amp/streamer) spread throughout the house.
 
Last edited:
New Apple TVs have no digital out anymore. Only hdmi. And the hdmi is limited to 24bit 48khz.
That's incorrect about the maximum sample rate speed of 48 kHz. Wikipedia says that for digital audio via HDMI can go up to 192 kHz:

So maybe a future AppleTV4k will give us hires lossless music (AppleTV4k currently can only play normal lossless).

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom