• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Master AI (Artificial Intelligence) Discussion/News Thread

One of things I have done using AI is to EQ speakers by uploading dirac measurments, rew measurements to build custom dirac curves. Offcourse, it was not an easy process because these generative AI solutions often lead to hallucinations and wrong answers. But as long you know some of the material and drive AI in the right direction it can deliver great results. I did this by uploading screenshots and AI worked with me to EQ the speakers.
 
One of things I have done using AI is to EQ speakers by uploading dirac measurments, rew measurements to build custom dirac curves. Offcourse, it was not an easy process because these generative AI solutions often lead to hallucinations and wrong answers. But as long you know some of the material and drive AI in the right direction it can deliver great results. I did this by uploading screenshots and AI worked with me to EQ the speakers.
Deserves a thread with before and after graphs, given instructions/questions to the bot, and feedback from the bot. Sure there would be much interest, feedback and suggestions. Cool :)
 
My favorite AI is NotebookLM. It is an extraordinary learning, comparing, and analyzing tool that only works with your uploaded data, therefore there is no possibility of false hallucinatory information, unless, of course, it's already in what you've uploaded. One just needs a Google email account.
 
My favorite AI is NotebookLM. It is an extraordinary learning, comparing, and analyzing tool that only works with your uploaded data, therefore there is no possibility of false hallucinatory information, unless, of course, it's already in what you've uploaded. One just needs a Google email account.
That assumption is incorrect. Hallucinations are inherent to the way current LLMs generate output. The training data behind the LLM is also out of your/our control. Even if you input your own notes, books and other materials, the output is still determined by the training of the transformer network. The tendency to hallucinate may be reduced compared to a generic AI like ChatGPT. This depends on many factors, including the specific configuration and training of NotebookLM.
 
Deserves a thread with before and after graphs, given instructions/questions to the bot, and feedback from the bot. Sure there would be much interest, feedback and suggestions. Cool :)

I don't have the before rew measurements. here's the after for my bmr monitors crossed at 80hz. this looks decent to me. I will share more details on my methodology later.

Screenshot 2025-05-15 at 12.50.23 PM.png
 
That assumption is incorrect. Hallucinations are inherent to the way current LLMs generate output. The training data behind the LLM is also out of your/our control. Even if you input your own notes, books and other materials, the output is still determined by the training of the transformer network. The tendency to hallucinate may be reduced compared to a generic AI like ChatGPT. This depends on many factors, including the specific configuration and training of NotebookLM.

i personally have not used online AI except as testing and I havent seen this and I dont expect it given that they brute force the highest parameter models

but i have seen it more on lower parameter local models

i'd love to hear about any hiccups on OpenAI or Grok or Copilot any signature flagship systems

i've used local Deepseek and have tested a bunch of models from google microsoft etc.

but as much as I like deepseek they sacrifice speed for accuracy and time is money or not.... i've been impressed with newcomer qwen and its variations

i'm using it to bang out business correspondence and the like and its been super useful
 
I like Perplexity the best of several I have tried.

As with all of them, the question must be stated correctly.

It is conversational and has both suggested follow-up questions and free-form. I especially
Like the medical AI - my background is clinical laboratory and medical research in thyroid function.

Try it and let me know your opinion!

Tillman
BS,MT(ASCP)
(Modern nomenclature: CLS - Clinical Laboratory Scientist) a little bit pretentious, but describes
what I did better, I think.
 
i personally have not used online AI except as testing and I havent seen this and I dont expect it given that they brute force the highest parameter models

but i have seen it more on lower parameter local models

i'd love to hear about any hiccups on OpenAI or Grok or Copilot any signature flagship systems
I've used the recent OpenAI top of the line including GPT-4o, o1 and o3 mini / mini high. They all lie to you if they don't know the answer. In my specific case, they lied/hallucinated in more than 2/3 of the answers. Doesn't matter how much compute you throw at a model or problem, this is inherent to how LLMs work. And it's dangerous that people don't recognize or know about this.
 
Here's a few ways I have used AI

Planned a trip to Tasmania with places to visit and stay, distances and time to drive etc... (turned out a great holiday)
Created a MS Word macro which identifies and colour-codes 'poor writing elements' such as repeated words, passive writing, poor sentence starts etc... for my students to improve their written expression (great feedback tool)
Inputted a lengthy medication list my stepmother's nursing-home doctor prescribed to understand each drug's purpose (consequently two were stopped)
Assisted with copy-editing a YA fiction manuscript I wrote 15 years ago, before submitting to publishers
And currently...copy/paste a lot of what I read on ASR to decode the science for me to understand :)
 
Google VEO-3 is simultaneously impressive and often bad. But it is the start of what I always assumed would be the baseline functionality for video generation. This is a good overview of it (much better than the demo clips I have seen):
 
Well, this might be fun. In Chat GPT:
Hi. I am a retired electronic engineer turned project manager. I was considered a subject matter expert in digital electronics when working as an engineer. But since becoming a project manager, my technical skills stagnated somewhat. Necessarily becoming broader, but less deep.

Since retirement, I've become interested in digital audio, and would like to get a good understanding of concepts such as the nyquist shannon sampling theorem. However, I'm finding my maths capability is not up to the job.

I studied engineering maths in the early 80s at university, but it was always my weakest subject, and I've not got better since then.

Would you be able to design a learning program to get my maths up to the level required to fully understand the sampling theorem, and then lead me through it?


Here is the initial response:
Absolutely—I’d be delighted to help you with that. It’s great that you have a clear goal (understanding the Nyquist-Shannon Sampling Theorem) and a rich background to build on. You’re in a great position to re-engage with the maths, and we can shape this learning journey to be as intuitive and tailored as possible, avoiding unnecessary abstraction and focusing on applied understanding.

---

## **Goal**

Develop the mathematical understanding needed to **fully grasp** the **Nyquist-Shannon Sampling Theorem**, especially in the context of **digital audio**.

---

## **Roadmap: Skills & Topics**

To reach your goal, we'll build up through the following areas:

### **Stage 1: Refresh Core Maths Skills**

These are foundations that you'll need in order to understand signal processing concepts later.

1. **Algebra Refresher**

* Manipulating equations
* Functions and their properties
2. **Basic Trigonometry**

* Sine and cosine functions
* Unit circle understanding
* Periodicity and frequency
3. **Exponents and Logarithms**

* Particularly base-2 and base-10 logs
* Useful for decibels and frequency scales

---

### **Stage 2: Maths for Signals**

These topics are directly relevant to signals and systems, and we'll keep it applied and intuitive.

1. **Complex Numbers**

* Euler’s formula: $e^{j\theta} = \cos(\theta) + j\sin(\theta)$
* Phasors and frequency representation
2. **Basic Calculus (Optional, Minimal)**

* Just enough to understand concepts like continuity and smoothness of signals
3. **Fourier Analysis (Gentle Intro)**

* What it means to decompose a signal into frequency components
* Notation and intuition around spectra

---

### **Stage 3: Signal Theory & Nyquist-Shannon**

Now we put everything together:

1. **Understanding Sampling**

* What is sampling?
* Continuous vs discrete signals
2. **Nyquist-Shannon Theorem**

* Statement and intuition
* Aliasing and how to avoid it
* Role in digital audio
3. **Practical Examples in Audio**

* CD audio sampling (44.1 kHz, 16-bit)
* Anti-aliasing filters

---

## ️ **Suggested Timeline**

We’ll go in short, digestible steps. Here’s a rough schedule:

| Week | Focus Area | Outcome |
| ---- | ----------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- |
| 1 | Algebra & Trig refresher | Confident with functions & waveforms |
| 2 | Exponents, logs, and complex numbers | Understand audio scales and phasors |
| 3 | Signals: sine waves, frequency, harmonics | Can “see” sounds as functions |
| 4 | Fourier intuition & basic analysis | See how signals are broken into spectra |
| 5 | Sampling: time vs frequency | Understand what sampling does |
| 6 | Nyquist-Shannon in depth | Master the theorem and its implications |
| 7 | Audio applications & experiments | Apply learning to real-world cases |

---

## ‍ Learning Style

Would you prefer this to be:

* **Text-based lessons with examples and exercises**?
* **Visual/interactive aids and diagrams**?
* **Occasional real-world coding in Python (e.g., plotting audio signals)?**
* **Audio-based explanations?**

Also, how comfortable are you with using tools like Jupyter notebooks, Python, or graphing calculators?

---

Once you answer that, I’ll generate **Week 1: Lesson 1** tailored to your preferred format and pace. Ready when you are!

We are now at the stage of setting up a local environment with python, and Jupyter notebooks.
 
I used AI to write the AI policy for a course syllabus. It did a damn good job.

My application is that it is 2:00am on Sunday and you have chills. Is something seriously wrong with you or is it side effect of the new medication/vaccine you took?
Use WebMD. No matter what your symptoms, you have cancer.
 
I've been playing around with Google's Veo.

I uploaded the following picture of my father (who died a few years back):

1749169571748.png


And gave Veo a very simple prompt of "Have him face the camera and smile".

It produced the following video:


Other than one "jump cut", I think it did a great job.
 
My mum showed me a video on Facebook earlier which purported to show Madeleine McCann (3yr old who went missing in Portugal 18years ago) being released from an concealed underground bunker in Portugal, it had thousands of likes/shares and many comments underneath. The ability of gullible folk to believe everything they see/hear on such gutter shit media sites has changed the world we live in for the worse. AI is not going to be the savour of the world, it will only fuck those who are not the 1%ers


If I had my way you should need to provide a real name/ evidence of who you are before you get the ability to sign up for such platforms, this would obviously impact whistleblowers/political dissidents etc so some form of protection would need to be in place to maintain their anonymity but I don't have the brains to work out a solution for such scenarios
 
The four moments in tech that impressed me personally the most are:

the first time I saw email in operation;
Photoshop content-aware editing;
ChatGPT writing an analytical essay on Shakespeare; and
prompt-to-video AI creation.

The last one concerns me. It's almost enough to make me want to wish computers away. The world survived the printing press, the Industrial Revolution and the bomb, and they certainly left their mark. The world will change again and the next 10-20 years will be...I'm not sure what word to use - interesting? terrifying? telling? catastrophic? We will see.
 
Speaking of the printing press, just like back in that time, people after the event would've been almost unable to comprehend the effort that previously went into producing a book, I know my students in a few short years will never know how much work animators 'used to do'.
 
Back
Top Bottom