• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Mark Levinson No 360S DAC Review

qsl

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2022
Messages
8
Likes
4
"Where there cheap choices then that were good? We will never know without a time machine to go back and measure as we do today."

I think I have a Perpetual Technologies DAC and upsampler (P3a and P1a respectively) floating about. They were considered best bang for the buck around that time (around a grand apiece). Let me know if you want to test them.
 

Jimster480

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
2,895
Likes
2,055
Location
Tampa Bay
Truly something that withstood the test of time. 20 years later it still measures well and I'm sure sounds fine. That is the beauty of audio since it doesn't move like video with all these formats and higher resolutions.
 

georgehifi

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
63
Likes
10
Truly something that withstood the test of time. 20 years later it still measures well and I'm sure sounds fine.
That's because it's a well designed R2R ladder dac using (4 x PCM1704 dac chips)

Cheers George
 

Jimster480

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
2,895
Likes
2,055
Location
Tampa Bay
That's because it's a well designed R2R ladder dac using (4 x PCM1704 dac chips)

Cheers George
it is one of the great things about audio. The resolution doesn't change like with Video over the last decades. So you could literally still use a device like this from 20 years ago and use it every day and know you are likely not missing out on anything basically ever...
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
6,096
Likes
6,144
Bur-Brown PCM1704 must have been popular back then,my ancient DENON DVD5000 also uses 4 of them (and I still have no complains about it's sound) .
 

Doodski

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Messages
21,581
Likes
21,874
Location
Canada
Oh, science is great. ASR has been a breath of fresh air, truly. It's just the "everything is the same" part (or, similarly, "everything can be made to sound the same if you tweak positioning, EQ, etc.") that I personally don't buy. I don't have the capacity to go through a hundred different DACs to decide that they are actually very similar. I much prefer to pick 3 "scientifically approved" ones and choose one that I like the most, subjectively. I don't care that a fancy, cardioid, active Kii Three is a perfect speaker, to me it doesn't sound very good. But an equally fancy, cardioid, active ME Geithain does, and I like the way it looks in my room, and I don't need to experiment with its positioning for weeks to make it perform the way I like.
ASR has it's limitations and I acknowledge that. I still don't see how people come up with chocolaty midrange and other subjective determinations.
 
Top Bottom