• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Marantz NR1510 AVR Review

Rate this AVR:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 221 81.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 41 15.0%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 3 1.1%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 8 2.9%

  • Total voters
    273

peng

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
5,727
Likes
5,300
Denon should have one.

Agreed, but it is understandable that they don't. That can change if and when someone acquires it (that is, without Marantz) from Masimo. There must be a good demand for a 2.1 to 5.1 small low profile AVRs that offers >=95 dB SINAD performance, preferrable with 2 independent subouts with or without RC because people can add DL/DLBC if they want.

I wonder why no one has come up with the 2.1, 3.1 and/or 5.1 versions yet, their marketing people are missing out on this imo. The only models that come close is the NR1200, but I am sure if its 2.1's sub-out can be pinged independently, for use with DLBC. I am still awaiting their users to confirm that.
 

Thomas_A

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Messages
3,469
Likes
2,466
Location
Sweden
Agreed, but it is understandable that they don't. That can change if and when someone acquires it (that is, without Marantz) from Masimo. There must be a good demand for a 2.1 to 5.1 small low profile AVRs that offers >=95 dB SINAD performance, preferrable with 2 independent subouts with or without RC because people can add DL/DLBC if they want.

I wonder why no one has come up with the 2.1, 3.1 and/or 5.1 versions yet, their marketing people are missing out on this imo. The only models that come close is the NR1200, but I am sure if its 2.1's sub-out can be pinged independently, for use with DLBC. I am still awaiting their users to confirm that.
I am quite confident that there is a large market for slim AVRs. Marantz has shown that it is possible to get reasonable performance from such units. That they don’t maintain performance with model iterations is unfortunate. If I were them, (Marantz/Denon) models would just be differentiated by channels, power and size, while other technical features would be software- and upgradeable options.

Not sure how Marantz and Denon would go to make unique series models, but one way would be slim AVR units or even slim AVR-Pre units with more ”pro” and upgradable features. Small powerful amps to add are plentiful today.
 

Dennis_FL

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 21, 2020
Messages
534
Likes
424
Location
Venice, FL
The various models seem to give quite varied measurement results. While the 1710/1510 models sadly have jitter issues, it seems that THD is different between them. I can’t replicate the pre out THD of the 1710 model that Amir measured in the 1510 model. This is odd given their resemblance. Also, earlier NR models did not have the jitter problem. Marantz is sadly alone with these slim line models having all these features. Denon should have one.
Denon and Marantz are the same company.
 

Thomas_A

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Messages
3,469
Likes
2,466
Location
Sweden
Denon and Marantz are the same company.
Yes. And that is why they can (and should IMO) develop different lines for Marantz and Denon. E.g. choose slim-line AVRs and slim AV pre-processors for Marantz, and the larger AVR units for Denon. After all, they use the same back-bone. But that is just me.
 

Megaken

Active Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2021
Messages
229
Likes
47
Question. If I use this with an external amp that doesn't have noise/distortion issues - would that improve the measurements, or would an amp simply amplify the issues?
 

Chrispy

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
7,938
Likes
6,097
Location
PNW
Question. If I use this with an external amp that doesn't have noise/distortion issues - would that improve the measurements, or would an amp simply amplify the issues?
Think of this way, each step in the chain has the chance to degrade, but not improve....
 

Megaken

Active Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2021
Messages
229
Likes
47
Think of this way, each step in the chain has the chance to degrade, but not improve....
Well I had a marantz receiver before, and it was a tad too 'warm' for me, but paired with a crispy external DAC and amp, it really did take that warm edge off and made it sound more balanced. So in that sense it did improve it.

Also, I'm thinking if the noise/distortion and whatever other issues come from the amp stage of the receiver, and you use an external amp, shouldn't it circumvent the issue?

Although I don't know which stage the issues come from.
 

Thomas_A

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Messages
3,469
Likes
2,466
Location
Sweden
Question. If I use this with an external amp that doesn't have noise/distortion issues - would that improve the measurements, or would an amp simply amplify the issues?
It will be better.
1. The power amp of the Marantz add distortion.
2. The pre-out of the NR1710, which I believe acts exactly as the NR1510 distortion-wise, have -93.5 dB THD+N in direct mode at a volume level set to 77, and -86.8 dB THD+N in auto mode.

 

Chrispy

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
7,938
Likes
6,097
Location
PNW
Well I had a marantz receiver before, and it was a tad too 'warm' for me, but paired with a crispy external DAC and amp, it really did take that warm edge off and made it sound more balanced. So in that sense it did improve it.

Also, I'm thinking if the noise/distortion and whatever other issues come from the amp stage of the receiver, and you use an external amp, shouldn't it circumvent the issue?

Although I don't know which stage the issues come from.

I've never had a receiver that I would label as warm or cold or whatever. Altering the signal path could yield a preference I suppose, but so could some eq otoh. A more powerful amp section can be an advantage, but I haven't found that has yielded any particular improvement over the receiver/amp combos I've got/had either.
 

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,194
Likes
16,916
Location
Central Fl
I am quite confident that there is a large market for slim AVRs.
Market, yes, the ladies and some men of the household want their gear to all but disappear if possible.
But todays multich AVR's have the need for an awful lot technology in them, a very competitive and demanding market.
Maybe trying to pack ten pounds of schiit in a 5 pound bad isn't the best idea for any number of reasons.
Besides, if your going to have 5 to 11 speakers and a sub or two in the room, what the hell do you need a 3" tall AVR for?
There's still no substituent for cubic inches. :p

Question. If I use this with an external amp that doesn't have noise/distortion issues - would that improve the measurements, or would an amp simply amplify the issues?
It will improve on amplifier performance but do nothing for the DAC performance issues.
If your still on the purchasing side, get a bigger AVR with at least 11+2 capabilities.
You WILL want to go Atmos at some point. ;)
 

Thomas_A

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Messages
3,469
Likes
2,466
Location
Sweden
Market, yes, the ladies and some men of the household want their gear to all but disappear if possible.
But todays multich AVR's have the need for an awful lot technology in them, a very competitive and demanding market.
Maybe trying to pack ten pounds of schiit in a 5 pound bad isn't the best idea for any number of reasons.
Besides, if your going to have 5 to 11 speakers and a sub or two in the room, what the hell do you need a 3" tall AVR for?
There's still no substituent for cubic inches. :p
Ha! :) But seriously, I already have enough speakers and gear and the NR1710 is perfect for my needs, channel-wise. And it is more than average households, but still a "slim" living room installation (IMO). So I think the market is large. And a larger AVR does not fit on the shelf. That is the reason.
 
Last edited:

Megaken

Active Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2021
Messages
229
Likes
47
I do not need Atmos, I don't own a TV and don't want to.

But I do need marantz because I have a weird room and in my experience audyssey does wonders. I tried dirac too and it doesn't work for me. So I'm thinking to get a simple marantz thing with audyssey, and I already have a great external DAC and Amp.
 

nick-v

Active Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
195
Likes
289
Market, yes, the ladies and some men of the household want their gear to all but disappear if possible.
But todays multich AVR's have the need for an awful lot technology in them, a very competitive and demanding market.
Maybe trying to pack ten pounds of schiit in a 5 pound bad isn't the best idea for any number of reasons.
Besides, if your going to have 5 to 11 speakers and a sub or two in the room, what the hell do you need a 3" tall AVR for?
There's still no substituent for cubic inches. :p


It will improve on amplifier performance but do nothing for the DAC performance issues.
If your still on the purchasing side, get a bigger AVR with at least 11+2 capabilities.
You WILL want to go Atmos at some point. ;)
There are other ways to make the gear disappear. This is in a part of my "half" of the master bedroom walk-in closet.

This powers BG Radia / Wisdom Audio in-wall speakers and a pair of nearfield SVS in-wall 3000 subwoofers (5.2.2).

20231010_172008-jpg.3515221
 
Last edited:

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,194
Likes
16,916
Location
Central Fl

lashto

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 8, 2019
Messages
1,045
Likes
535
There are other ways to make the gear disappear. This is in my "half" of the master bedroom walk-in closet.

This powers BG Radia / Wisdom Audio in-wall speakers and a pair of nearfield SVS in-wall 3000 subwoofers (5.2.2).

20231010_172008-jpg.3515221
that is a serious amount of electronics for a bedroom. More than most people have in their main listening room.
Whoever said that the HiFi industry is dying, did not see your profile. With that amount of gear you can easily convert your house into and audio shop :)
And btw, do you have a favorite system?
 

SVO

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2024
Messages
2
Likes
3
There are other ways to make the gear disappear. This is in a part of my "half" of the master bedroom walk-in closet.

This powers BG Radia / Wisdom Audio in-wall speakers and a pair of nearfield SVS in-wall 3000 subwoofers (5.2.2).

20231010_172008-jpg.3515221
Yeah, well, not everyone has unlimited budget. Yawn.

Don't assume everyone is using it 5.1 or 7.1- the options for 2.1 or 3.1 with HDMI control SUCK. WiiM amp sections suck. SVS has no calibration means. BluOS devices overpriced and no calibration. For a living room TV Audio/ 2.1 stereo (assume the house is built and no massive closet adjacent to annex) the whole system needs to be compact. Marantz/Denon should dump the amps and work on improving the pre/pro at say $600 in same chassis and then the buyer can acquire the watts they need. Put a 5" screen in with album art and you could get $900 and sell many thousands of them in the U.S. alone.
 
Top Bottom