It seems to lack a full set of pre-outs...America should follow soon.
Canada: Link
Thank you for the suggestion.I don't think you need pre-outs for the wide range of the JBL AVR class-D models.
You are not guaranteed such values with the classic AVRs:
For example JBL MA9100HP,
Rated Power @ 4Ω (20Hz – 20kHz, 2 channels driven, 0.5% THD max): 240 W RMS
If you can get a brand new with full factory warranty for 700 Euro then I would say it is probably worth getting it if you need/must have a full set of 7.1 channel pre outs. In the US it is listed for $1,200, in that case I would always recommend considering Denon's comparable model as a viable option. If you are okay with just 2.1 pre out, then the AVC-X1800H may be a better option, especially if you can get a good price for one.Is it worth getting for 700€ or are there better options?
I don’t need many channels, that Denon is 400€ in my place. Cinema 70s is for 700€ and that’s not even sale price. I want the best stereo quality and eARC in 700€ budget.If you can get a brand new with full factory warranty for 700 Euro then I would say it is probably worth getting it if you need/must have a full set of 7.1 channel pre outs. In the US it is listed for $1,200, in that case I would always recommend considering Denon's comparable model as a viable option. If you are okay with just 2.1 pre out, then the AVC-X1800H may be a better option, especially if you can get a good price for one.
The Denon has eARC, but while the model for US and Canada has 2.1 preouts, the Europe models onky have subwoofee preouts. As for sound quality, the Cinema70 does not sound better. In fact the Denon will sound better in bass if you use Audyssey well, because it has the better XT version, than the Cinema70's lowest Audyssey version.I don’t need many channels, that Denon is 400€ in my place. Cinema 70s is for 700€ and that’s not even sale price. I want the best stereo quality and eARC in 700€ budget.
Bluesound Powernode EdgeI want the best stereo quality and eARC in 700€ budget.
Based on that, I'd feel more comfortable running no worse than the Cinema 50!The LS50 Meta has minimum EPDRs of 1.66 ohms between 135Hz and 140Hz and 1.7 ohms between 660Hz and 725Hz, both regions where music can have high energy. The partnering amplifier needs to be comfortable driving 4 ohms.
Source: Stereophile
Why not? We have benchmarks for C50 at 4 ohms!A modern class-D AVR starting with a JBL MA310 would have no problems driving the KEFs.
The C50 would not be a good choice either.
I would ignore such blanket statements, of course the C50 can do it, even easily, but as always it depends on factors such as speaker sensitivity, required spl, distance etc. Without stating the load/use conditions, any such comments about AVR can or cannot drive 4 ohm (or lower so called EPDR values) means very little. Someone seems to get fixated on those terms/jargons without really understanding what they mean. Hate to say this, it takes better than superficial understanding of the often thrown around terms such as "high current", EPDR, output devices SOA etc.Why not? We have benchmarks for C50 at 4 ohms!
If this were the case, Marantz would also specify the C50 accordingly at 4 ohms. However, a useful specification can only be found for 8 ohms:even easily
I assume you understand the basic electrical theory, so, consider this:If this were the case, Marantz would also specify the C50 accordingly at 4 ohms. However, a useful specification can only be found for 8 ohms:
Power Output (8 ohm, 20 Hz - 20 kHz, 0.08% 2ch Drive): 110 W
This reminds me of another Marantz amplifier:
View attachment 382179
And here the power loss (heat) generated in the output stage section is not even visualized.
You can use the Denon 3800 (which Amir bench tested) as a proxy for C50:If this were the case, Marantz would also specify the C50 accordingly at 4 ohms. However, a useful specification can only be found for 8 ohms:
Power Output (8 ohm, 20 Hz - 20 kHz, 0.08% 2ch Drive): 110 W
This reminds me of another Marantz amplifier:
View attachment 382179
And here the power loss (heat) generated in the output stage section is not even visualized.