The post you referenced is from Oct. 20, 2020. Why are you posting a reply almost a year later. Have you nothing else to do?
If the question was the silly and inappropriate why didn't you reply at least in the same calendar year?
I re-read my post and I don't see any horrible mistakes. The comments referenced in my post were at the bottom of your post. I didn't just jump to the bottom of your post to read them. Why would I do that? It wasn't clear why you included the comments in your original post since the comments didn't seem to directly relate to the remainder of your post.
Do you object to the content of my post? If so, what is wrong with it?
Give it a rest, or provide a coherent technical response. A year is a long time to respond to a post.
I guess your post didn't really hit me until now when the 7705 is suddenly getting some attentions again. The answers to your questions "Why did you post Gene's comments? Do you agree with the comments and with Marantz's claim? " were obvious if you actually read the post; and if you have re-read the post and still seriously feel the need to ask the same questions then my response would be the same. Though I suppose I could simply ask you back a silly question such as why you want to know why I quoted Gene, but I am not going to add to the silliness. It is getting ridiculous as that was not the first time or even the second time
Last edited: