I would simply point you to Dirac's own quote - anything capable of running DLBC can run ART.2 things:
1) What isn't made in China these days?
2) The DSP is the main differentiator (and the most likely reason ART is not coming to current gen of PAC).
Marantz AV20:
https://www.audionet.com.tw/thread-18349-1-1.html
- SHARC+ Griffin Lite XP DSP (2000 MIPS) <- this is the same chip found in the 3800 and the reason why every machine w/this chip can do Dirac ART!
- 9 x ESS ES9018K2M (2CH 32 bit DAC chips), 127dB DNR, -120dB THD+N
- 4 x capacitors (totals 40,000 µF)
Integra DRX8.4:
https://www.audionet.com.tw/thread-16025-1-1.html
- Cirrus Logic CS49844A
- TI Aureus 4-core 32-bit DSP TMS320DA808 (D808K013DPTP5) <-for Dirac, AccuEQ
- 2 x ES9026PRO (8CH 32 bit DAC chips), 124dB DNR, -110dB THD+N
- 2 x 18,000 µF capacitors
The DSP in the DRX8.4 is at least 10 years old and can even be found in my last AVR, the Pioneer SC-LX701! There's no question in my mind that PAC needs to up its DSP game if it wants to join the ART party!
https://www.hi-av.net/modules/article/view.article.php?564
The corollary being that the number of filters available may be limited - so on the D&M devices you can have up to 98 filters, how many would be possible on the O/I platform is unknown.
But in my X4800 based 5.2.4 setup optimal setups are trending around 51 to 54 filters - with those experiments using 90+ filters being of lesser objective quality.
