- Joined
- Mar 1, 2024
- Messages
- 475
- Likes
- 542
Doesn’t seem that quiet to me. That is C-weighted so maybe that’s it?you listen to music at 55dB SPL? Isn't 60dB a quiet conversation?
-Ed
Doesn’t seem that quiet to me. That is C-weighted so maybe that’s it?you listen to music at 55dB SPL? Isn't 60dB a quiet conversation?
No idea. This isn’t NASA-grade precision. Somebody asked, I made best efforts at zero cost to answer.OK what is it calibrated against? Or do we care?
Yes, B100s are in the queue.Thank you for your initial assessment and the tip with the special version of the Carmen fantasy! Now it's time for @amirm to take a look at the devices. Topping has probably already sent him test devices and they are in the queue...
thw
Can’t wait to see what the results are! I LOVE how my system sounds with the B100s driving my LS50 Metas! And they run nice and cool even when listening for hours!Yes, B100s are in the queue.
@antcollinet already brought down my original response, but do note there's more to ownership experience than just sound. The build/materials quality on the B100 is noticeably higher than Fosi's (affecting important components like the speaker cable binding posts), and the B100 amps are running significantly cooler than any of the Fosi amps, particularly cooler running than the V3 Mono. These are things to factor. Additionally, you have much finer Gain control, which can be very important for system component matching. The V3 Mono completely lacks variable gain for Balanced input, and there's only two Gain options for Single-ended input. The ZA3 does it even worse by relying on an inexpensive volume attenuator ("pot"). As we have also seen, V3 Mono's automatic on/off function isn't particularly power-efficient. ZA3 offers 12V trigger just like B100, but again, you have the lack of PFFB on ZA3 and double signal conversion (for XLR users) due to the volume pot.Can you hear the difference though? Please say yes
Haven’t heard of it, but it’s definitely doable, as it basically exists already. The A70 Pro is where these amplifiers got their topology from, and it’s stereo. However, it is for headphones.Does anyone have information on whether Topping is planning a stereo power amplifier like B100 but stereo ? On B100 amp topology ?
Hello Topping, I'm looking forward to that.Yes, B100s are in the queue.
I would not be able to accurately ABX between Low and Medium Gain on my B100s once volume is matched via preamp. Medium Gain’s performance is transparent enough compared to Low Gain.Hello Topping, I'm looking forward to that.
The specs on your website are stunning, and over the last year I've come to trust your claims.
I assume, however, that all those great figures were taken in low gain?
Finding a good preamp to drive the required input level is difficult, to say the least.
Can you tell us how the B100 performs at medium gain?
Many thanks, Nick
Hi,Hello Topping, I'm looking forward to that.
The specs on your website are stunning, and over the last year I've come to trust your claims.
I assume, however, that all those great figures were taken in low gain?
Finding a good preamp to drive the required input level is difficult, to say the least.
Can you tell us how the B100 performs at medium gain?
Many thanks, Nick
That came from thd Topping website, which has long been shown to give reliable information.***MAY*** be able to get there?
Where did the graph you share come from?
In any case, @welwynnick s post you quoted was replying to @pavlo_y0l0s s post which was assuming the amp was 200W. It was that assumption that was being corrected.***MAY*** be able to get there?
Where did the graph you share come from?